Replace early returns in KeyPair::KeyPair() with asserts.
The if statements imply there is an error we are handling, but keypair_xonly_pub
and xonly_pubkey_serialize can only fail if the keypair object is malformed, i.e.,
it was created with a bad secret key. Since we check that the keypair was created
successfully before attempting to extract the public key, using asserts more
accurately documents what we expect here and removes untested branches from the code.
Move `SignSchnorr` to `KeyPair`. This makes `CKey::SignSchnorr` now
compute a `KeyPair` object and then call `KeyPair::SignSchorr`. The
notable changes are:
* Move the merkle_root tweaking out of the sign function and into
the KeyPair constructor
* Remove the temporary secp256k1_keypair object and have the
functions access m_keypair->data() directly
Add a `KeyPair` class which wraps the `secp256k1_keypair`. This keeps
the secret data in secure memory and enables passing the
`KeyPair` object directly to libsecp256k1 functions expecting a
`secp256k1_keypair`.
Motivation: when passing `CKeys` for taproot outputs to libsecp256k1 functions,
the first step is to create a `secp256k1_keypair` data type and use that
instead. This is so the libsecp256k1 function can determine if the key
needs to be negated, e.g., when signing.
This is a bit clunky in that it creates an extra step when using a `CKey`
for a taproot output and also involves copying the secret data into a
temporary object, which the caller must then take care to cleanse. In
addition, the logic for applying the merkle_root tweak currently
only exists in the `SignSchnorr` function.
In a later commit, we will add the merkle_root tweaking logic to this
function, which will make the merkle_root logic reusable outside of
signing by using the `KeyPair` class directly.
Co-authored-by: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
This method was introduced as a pre-requirement for the v2 transport
protocol back then (see PR #14047, commit 463921bb), when it was still
BIP151. With the replacement BIP324, this is not needed anymore, and
it's also unlikely that any other proposal would need to negate private
keys at this abstraction level.
(If there is really demand, it's trivial to reintroduce the method.)
Making the `GenerateRandomKey` helper available to other modules via
key.{h.cpp} allows us to create random private keys directly at
instantiation of CKey, in contrast to the two-step process of creating
the instance and then having to call `MakeNewKey(...)`.
Instead of storing the key material as an std::vector (with secure allocator),
use a secure_unique_ptr to a 32-byte array, and use nullptr for invalid keys.
This means a smaller CKey type, and no secure/dynamic memory usage for invalid
keys.
2022917223 Add secp256k1_selftest call (Pieter Wuille)
3bfca788b0 Remove explicit enabling of default modules (Pieter Wuille)
4462cb0498 Adapt to libsecp256k1 API changes (Pieter Wuille)
9d47e7b71b Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 44c2452fd3..21ffe4b22a (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Now that libsecp256k1 has a release (https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-December/021271.html), update the subtree to match it.
The changes themselves are not very impactful for Bitcoin Core, but include:
* It's no longer needed to specify whether contexts are for signing or verification or both (all contexts support everything), so make use of that in this PR.
* Verification operations can use the static context now, removing the need for some infrastructure in pubkey.cpp to make sure a context exists.
* Most modules are now enabled by default, so we can drop explicit enabling for them.
* CI improvements (in particular, MSVC and more recent MacOS)
* Introduction of an internal int128 type, which has no effect for GCC/Clang builds, but enables 128-bit multiplication in MSVC, giving a ~20% speedup there (but still slower than GCC/Clang).
* Release process changes (process documentation, changelog, ...).
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 2022917223, but 4462cb0498 could use more eyes on it.
achow101:
ACK 2022917223
jonasnick:
utACK 2022917223
Tree-SHA512: 8a9fe28852abe74abd6f96fef16a94d5a427b1d99bff4caab1699014d24698aab9b966a5364a46ed1001c07a7c1d825154ed4e6557c7decce952b77330a8616b
* Use SECP256K1_CONTEXT_NONE when creating signing context, as
SECP256K1_CONTEXT_SIGN is deprecated and unnecessary.
* Use secp256k1_static_context where applicable.
3ae7791bca refactor: use Span in random.* (pasta)
Pull request description:
~This PR does two things~
1. use a Span<unsigned char> for GetRandBytes and GetStrongRandBytes
~2. make GetRand a template for which any integral type can be used, where the default behavior is to return a random integral up to the max of the integral unless a max is provided.
This simplifies a lot of code from `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()`~
MarcoFalke this was inspired by your comment here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24185#issuecomment-1025514263 about using Span, so hopefully I'll be able to get this PR done and merged 😂
~Also, if requested I could revert the `GetRand(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()` -> `GetRand<uint64_t>()` related changes if it ends up causing too many conflicts~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thank you! Code review re-ACK 3ae7791bca
Tree-SHA512: 12375a83b68b288916ba0de81cfcab4aac14389a66a36811ae850427435eb67dd55e47df9ac3ec47db4e214f4330139e548bec815fff8a3f571484ea558dca79
libsecp256k1's secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign only follows BIP340 exactly
if an aux_rand32 argument is passed. When no randomness is used
(as is the case in the current codebase here), there is no impact
on security between not providing aux_rand32 at all, or providing
an empty one. Yet, for repeatability/testability it is simpler
to always use an all-zero one.
79fd28cacb Adds verification step to Schnorr and ECDSA signing (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
As detailed in #22435, BIP340 defines that during Schnorr signing a verification should be done. This is so that potentially corrupt signage does not leak information about private keys used during the process. This is not followed today as no such verification step is being done. The same is valid for ECDSA signing functions `Sign` and `SignCompact`.
This PR adds this missing verification step to `SignSchnorr`, `Sign` and `SignCompact`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 79fd28cacb
laanwj:
Code review ACK 79fd28cacb
theStack:
re-ACK 79fd28cacb
Tree-SHA512: 8fefa26caea577ae8631cc16c4e2f4cc6cfa1c7cf51d45a4a34165636ee290950617a17a19b4237c6f7a841db0e40fd5c36ad12ef43da82507c0e9fb9375ab82
As defined in BIP340, a verification step should be executed after
`secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign` to ensure that a potentially corrupted
signature isn't used; using corrupted signatures could reveal
information about the private key used. This applies to ECSDA as
well.
Additionally clears schnorr signature if signing failed.
This makes calling code less verbose and less fragile. Also, by adding
the CKey::data() member function, it is now possible to call HexStr()
with a CKey object.
