16bd283b3a Reapply "test: p2p: check that connecting to ourself leads to disconnect" (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0dbcd4c148 net: prevent sending messages in `NetEventsInterface::InitializeNode` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
66673f1c13 net: fix race condition in self-connect detection (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a recently discovered race condition in the self-connect detection (see #30362 and #30368).
Initiating an outbound network connection currently involves the following steps after the socket connection is established (see [`CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection`](bd5d1688b4/src/net.cpp (L2923-L2930)) method):
1. set up node state
2. queue VERSION message (both steps 1 and 2 happen in [`InitializeNode`](bd5d1688b4/src/net_processing.cpp (L1662-L1683)))
3. add new node to vector `m_nodes`
If we connect to ourself, it can happen that the sent VERSION message (step 2) is received and processed locally *before* the node object is added to the connection manager's `m_nodes` vector (step 3). In this case, the self-connect remains undiscovered, as the detection doesn't find the outbound peer in `m_nodes` yet (see `CConnman::CheckIncomingNonce`).
Fix this by swapping the order of 2. and 3., by taking the `PushNodeVersion` call out of `InitializeNode` and doing that in the `SendMessages` method instead, which is only called for `CNode` instances in `m_nodes`.
The temporarily reverted test introduced in #30362 is readded. Fixes#30368.
Thanks go to vasild, mzumsande and dergoegge for suggestions on how to fix this (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30368#issuecomment-2200625017 ff. and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394#discussion_r1668290789).
ACKs for top commit:
naiyoma:
tested ACK [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394/commits/16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30394/commits/16bd283b3ad05daa41259a062aee0fc05b463fa6), built and tested locally, test passes successfully.
mzumsande:
ACK 16bd283b3a
tdb3:
ACK 16bd283b3a
glozow:
ACK 16bd283b3a
dergoegge:
ACK 16bd283b3a
Tree-SHA512: 5b8aced6cda8deb38d4cd3fe4980b8af505d37ffa0925afaa734c5d81efe9d490dc48a42e1d0d45dd2961c0e1172a3d5b6582ae9a2d642f2592a17fbdc184445
6d503ea4f8 Rename elements/jets.c
c68063f9ef Add testcases that are an even multiple of 1000 milliWU
92887000e6 Add minCost parameter
82d6260ed8 Remove intermedite primitive directory
09b4eee340 Make raw environment struct tags elements specific
a93cd359df Make environment struct tags elements specific
26de216e24 Make primitive.h functions indirect
35d188a247 rename elementsJets.* to jets.*
7fd6dbe2ca simplicity_computeCmr -> simplicity_elements_computeCmr
git-subtree-dir: src/simplicity
git-subtree-split: 6d503ea4f8859ec63ad22a22c0ccef067b1a0b5d
1) Short functional tests (more than 200, so it takes a long time)
2) Long (or failing) functional tests (only a few, so it takes roughly
30 minutes) + unit tests
5fd4836019 init: change shutdown order of load block thread and scheduler (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This avoids situations during a reindex, in which the shutdown doesn't finish since `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue()` is called by the load block thread when the scheduler is already stopped, in which case it would block indefinitely. This can lead to intermittent failures in `feature_reindex.py` (#30424), which I could locally reproduce with
```diff
diff --git a/src/validation.cpp b/src/validation.cpp
index 74f0e4975c..be1706fdaf 100644
--- a/src/validation.cpp
+++ b/src/validation.cpp
@@ -3446,6 +3446,7 @@ static void LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(ValidationSignals& signals) LOCKS_EXCL
AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main);
if (signals.CallbacksPending() > 10) {
+ std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(50));
signals.SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue();
}
}
```
It has also been reported by users running `reindex-chainstate` (#23234).
I thought for a bit about potential downsides of changing this order, but couldn't find any.
Fixes#30424Fixes#23234
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 5fd4836019
hebasto:
re-ACK 5fd4836019.
tdb3:
ACK 5fd4836019
BrandonOdiwuor:
Code Review ACK 5fd4836019
Tree-SHA512: 3b8894e99551c5d4392b55eaa718eee05841a7287aeef2978699e1d633d5234399fa2f5a3e71eac1508d97845906bd33e0e63e5351855139e7be04c421359b36
bbe82c116eFix#29767, set m_synced = true after Commit() (nanlour)
Pull request description:
I think this problem https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29767#issue-2216373048 is because of
in BaseIndex::Sync
61de64df67/src/index/base.cpp (L163-L168)
Setup m_synced = true; before Commit();
So this may cause a race condition window to BaseIndex::BlockConnected
61de64df67/src/index/base.cpp (L271-L274)
So i try to fix it with move m_synced = true after Commit().
Also see comment of Sync():
61de64df67/src/index/base.h (L151-L156)
I am a newcomer interested in Bitcoin, trying to become a member of the Bitcoin Core development team. Please give me some feedback if you could, as I may be doing something wrong. Thank you!
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK bbe82c116e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bbe82c116e
Tree-SHA512: 89a09498a232c87ef1e083d4cc4ed9bb15f045ad0624d5d150a87187b2b8a48a41137974dbc7ea5c37f73da90742c43259f5aa7f84b4179eb8d62033e44fa479
b77bad309e rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #24542Fixes: #30052
Without explicitly declaring the move, these `UniValues` get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the `UniValue` objects.
Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK b77bad309e
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK b77bad309e
TheCharlatan:
ACK b77bad309e
theuni:
utACK b77bad309e
hebasto:
ACK b77bad309e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK b77bad309e
Tree-SHA512: 767608331040f9cfe5c3568ed0e3c338920633472a1a50d4bbb47d1dc69d2bb11466d611f050ac8ad1a894b47fe1ea4d968cf34cbd44d4bb8d479fc5c7475f6d
d0b047494c test: add GetAddedNodeInfo() CJDNS regression unit test (Jon Atack)
684da97070 p2p, bugfix: detect addnode cjdns peers in GetAddedNodeInfo() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Addnode peers connected to us via the cjdns network are currently not detected by `CConnman::GetAddedNodeInfo()`, i.e. `fConnected` is always false. This causes the following issues:
- RPC `getaddednodeinfo` incorrectly shows them as not connected
- `CConnman::ThreadOpenAddedConnections()` continually retries to connect them
Fix the issue and add a unit regression test. Extracted from #28248. Suggest running the test with:
`./src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_peer_connection_tests -l test_suite`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
utACK d0b047494c
brunoerg:
crACK d0b047494c
pinheadmz:
ACK d0b047494c
Tree-SHA512: a4d81425f79558f5792585611f3fe8ab999b82144daeed5c3ec619861c69add934c2b2afdad24c8488a0ade94f5ce8112f5555d60a1ce913d4f5a1cf5dbba55a
7cb9367157 rpc: keep .cookie if it was not generated (Roman Zeyde)
Pull request description:
Otherwise, starting bitcoind twice may cause the `.cookie` file generated by the first instance to be deleted by the second instance shutdown (after failing to obtain a lock).
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
re-ACK 7cb9367157
achow101:
ACK 7cb9367157
kristapsk:
re-ACK 7cb9367157
stickies-v:
ACK 7cb9367157
Tree-SHA512: 0960dbc457975b0e0535f3d814824a879d7f85c9f1191537415b3fc253429a316a8e4badde56c8bc139778f132392983cec5fbe03891fb15ff61d3bc3f6e681b
51f7668d31 addrman: change nid_type from int to int64_t (Martin Zumsande)
051ba3290e addrman, refactor: introduce user-defined type for internal nId (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
With `nIdCount` being incremented for each addr received, an attacker could cause an overflow in the past, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/07/31/disclose-addrman-int-overflow/
Even though that attack was made infeasible indirectly by addr rate-limiting (PR #22387), to be on the safe side and prevent any regressions change the `nId`s used internally to `int64_t`.
This is being done by first introducing a user-defined type for `nId`s in the first commit, and then updating it to `int64_t` (thanks sipa for help with this!).
Note that `nId` is only used internally, it is not part of the serialization, so `peers.dat` should not be affected by this.
I assume that the only reason this was not done in the past is to not draw attention to this previously undisclosed issue.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 51f7668d31
stratospher:
ACK 51f7668d31. I think it's a good change to make the nId space large(64 bits) so that the nId values are distinct.
achow101:
ACK 51f7668d31
Tree-SHA512: 68d4b8b0269a01a9544bedfa7c1348ffde00a288537e4c8bf2b88372ac7d96c4566a44dd6b06285f2fcf31b4f9336761e3bca7253fbc20db5e0d04e887156224
3472e2f5ec Merge sipa/minisketch#81: Avoid overflowing shift by special casing inverse of 1
653d8b2e26 Avoid overflowing shift by special casing inverse of 1
33b7c200b9 Merge sipa/minisketch#80: Add c++20 version of CountBits
4a48f31a37 Merge sipa/minisketch#83: ci: Fix "s390x (big-endian)" task
82b6488acb Add c++20 version of CountBits
0498084d31 ci: Fix "s390x (big-endian)" task
71709dca9e Merge sipa/minisketch#82: ci: Fix `x86_64-w64-mingw32` task
9e6127fa98 Merge sipa/minisketch#74: Avoid >> above type width in BitWriter
ed420bc170 ci: Fix `x86_64-w64-mingw32` task
fe1040f227 Drop -Wno-shift-count-overflow compile flag
154bcd43bd Avoid >> above type width in BitWriter
67b87acdb6 Merge sipa/minisketch#78: ci: Update macOS image for CI
7de7250416 ci: Update macOS image for CI
83d812ea9f Merge sipa/minisketch#73: ci: Use correct variable to designate C++ compiler
e051a7d690 ci: Install wine32 package for Windows tests
2d2c695d78 build: Drop unused `CC` variable
1810fcbd11 ci: Use correct variable to designate C++ compiler
022b959049 Merge sipa/minisketch#77: Add missing include
08443c4892 Add missing include
git-subtree-dir: src/minisketch
git-subtree-split: 3472e2f5ec75ace39ce9243af6b3fee233a67492
4722b7c715 build: remove minisketch clz check (fanquake)
1eea10a6d2 Squashed 'src/minisketch/' changes from a571ba20f9..3472e2f5ec (fanquake)
Pull request description:
https://github.com/sipa/minisketch/pull/81 will fix#29799.
Minor build cleanups after https://github.com/sipa/minisketch/pull/80.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
utACK 4722b7c715
hebasto:
ACK 4722b7c715, I have verified the subtree update and reviewed the build system changes. Both look OK.
Tree-SHA512: eabd82e5a13cc4f32155319df97368f2e8c93320a4265b6c372efcb1ea4e756f6693df7c02498c8ea989ccd376a20277fa110c66d0754cb9bca5e54d18e0a965
Unlike in Bitcoin, our message handling thread needs to open sockets in
order to call out to the mainchain RPC interface. We recently brought in
a seccomp syscall whitelist from upstream, which is enabled on my local
CI box (though apparently not on Github CI) and it is failing on this.
This block passed on April 14 (so we will activate as soon as this is
merged and there is a week of unaminous signalling), and its a nice memorable
number.
