mirror of
https://github.com/lightninglabs/loop.git
synced 2026-08-13 12:33:03 +02:00
loop: fix loopout and client tests for sweeper integration
This commit is contained in:
parent
0914074b10
commit
33fdde949f
4 changed files with 173 additions and 56 deletions
164
loopout_test.go
164
loopout_test.go
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"github.com/lightninglabs/lndclient"
|
||||
"github.com/lightninglabs/loop/loopdb"
|
||||
"github.com/lightninglabs/loop/sweep"
|
||||
"github.com/lightninglabs/loop/sweepbatcher"
|
||||
"github.com/lightninglabs/loop/test"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet/chainfee"
|
||||
|
|
@ -293,13 +294,33 @@ func testCustomSweepConfTarget(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
return expiryChan
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error)
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error, 2)
|
||||
|
||||
batcherStore := sweepbatcher.NewStoreMock()
|
||||
|
||||
batcher := sweepbatcher.NewBatcher(
|
||||
lnd.WalletKit, lnd.ChainNotifier, lnd.Signer,
|
||||
mockMuSig2SignSweep, mockVerifySchnorrSigSuccess,
|
||||
lnd.ChainParams, batcherStore, cfg.store,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
tctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
||||
defer cancel()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := swap.execute(context.Background(), &executeConfig{
|
||||
err := batcher.Run(tctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
errChan <- err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := swap.execute(tctx, &executeConfig{
|
||||
statusChan: statusChan,
|
||||
blockEpochChan: blockEpochChan,
|
||||
timerFactory: timerFactory,
|
||||
sweeper: sweeper,
|
||||
batcher: batcher,
|
||||
cancelSwap: server.CancelLoopOutSwap,
|
||||
verifySchnorrSig: mockVerifySchnorrSigFail,
|
||||
}, ctx.Lnd.Height)
|
||||
|
|
@ -335,16 +356,21 @@ func testCustomSweepConfTarget(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
ctx.NotifyConf(htlcTx)
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that we made a query to track our payment, as required for
|
||||
// preimage push tracking.
|
||||
trackPayment := ctx.AssertTrackPayment()
|
||||
|
||||
expiryChan <- time.Now()
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.AssertEpochListeners(1)
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 1)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// Expect a signing request for the HTLC success transaction.
|
||||
if !IsTaprootSwap(&swap.SwapContract) {
|
||||
<-ctx.Lnd.SignOutputRawChannel
|
||||
|
|
@ -409,7 +435,7 @@ func testCustomSweepConfTarget(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
// The sweep should have a fee that corresponds to the custom
|
||||
// confirmation target.
|
||||
_ = assertSweepTx(testReq.SweepConfTarget)
|
||||
sweepTx := assertSweepTx(testReq.SweepConfTarget)
|
||||
|
||||
// Once we have published an on chain sweep, we expect a preimage to
|
||||
// have been pushed to our server.
|
||||
|
|
@ -426,23 +452,13 @@ func testCustomSweepConfTarget(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
State: lnrpc.Payment_SUCCEEDED,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We'll then notify the height at which we begin using the default
|
||||
// confirmation target.
|
||||
defaultConfTargetHeight := ctx.Lnd.Height +
|
||||
testLoopOutMinOnChainCltvDelta - DefaultSweepConfTargetDelta
|
||||
blockEpochChan <- defaultConfTargetHeight
|
||||
expiryChan <- time.Now()
|
||||
|
||||
// Expect another signing request.
|
||||
<-ctx.Lnd.SignOutputRawChannel
|
||||
|
||||
// We should expect to see another sweep using the higher fee since the
|
||||
// spend hasn't been confirmed yet.
|
||||
sweepTx := assertSweepTx(DefaultSweepConfTarget)
|
||||
|
||||
// Notify the spend so that the swap reaches its final state.
|
||||
// Notify the batch for the spend.
|
||||
ctx.NotifySpend(sweepTx, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
// After receiving the notification the batch will start monitoring the
|
||||
// confirmations.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterConf(true, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
cfg.store.(*loopdb.StoreMock).AssertLoopOutState(loopdb.StateSuccess)
|
||||
status = <-statusChan
|
||||
require.Equal(t, loopdb.StateSuccess, status.State)
|
||||
|
|
@ -511,13 +527,33 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
return expiryChan
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error)
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error, 2)
|
||||
|
||||
batcherStore := sweepbatcher.NewStoreMock()
|
||||
|
||||
batcher := sweepbatcher.NewBatcher(
|
||||
lnd.WalletKit, lnd.ChainNotifier, lnd.Signer,
|
||||
mockMuSig2SignSweep, mockVerifySchnorrSigSuccess,
|
||||
lnd.ChainParams, batcherStore, cfg.store,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
tctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
||||
defer cancel()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := batcher.Run(tctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
errChan <- err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := swap.execute(context.Background(), &executeConfig{
|
||||
statusChan: statusChan,
|
||||
blockEpochChan: blockEpochChan,
|
||||
timerFactory: timerFactory,
|
||||
sweeper: sweeper,
|
||||
batcher: batcher,
|
||||
cancelSwap: server.CancelLoopOutSwap,
|
||||
verifySchnorrSig: mockVerifySchnorrSigFail,
|
||||
}, ctx.Lnd.Height)
|
||||
|
|
@ -553,10 +589,6 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
ctx.NotifyConf(htlcTx)
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that we made a query to track our payment, as required for
|
||||
// preimage push tracking.
|
||||
trackPayment := ctx.AssertTrackPayment()
|
||||
|
|
@ -567,6 +599,15 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// preimage is not revealed, we also do not expect a preimage push.
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.AssertEpochListeners(1)
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 1)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// When using taproot htlcs the flow is different as we do reveal the
|
||||
// preimage before sweeping in order for the server to trust us with
|
||||
// our MuSig2 signing attempts.
|
||||
|
|
@ -582,15 +623,6 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
preimage := <-server.preimagePush
|
||||
require.Equal(t, swap.Preimage, preimage)
|
||||
|
||||
// Try MuSig2 signing first and fail it so that we go for a
|
||||
// normal sweep.
|
||||
for i := 0; i < maxMusigSweepRetries; i++ {
|
||||
expiryChan <- time.Now()
|
||||
|
||||
preimage := <-server.preimagePush
|
||||
require.Equal(t, swap.Preimage, preimage)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
<-ctx.Lnd.SignOutputRawChannel
|
||||
|
||||
// We expect the sweep tx to have been published.
|
||||
|
|
@ -611,6 +643,10 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// Now when we report a new block and tick our expiry fee timer, and
|
||||
// fees are acceptably low so we expect our sweep to be published.
|
||||
blockEpochChan <- ctx.Lnd.Height + 2
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 2)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
if IsTaprootSwap(&swap.SwapContract) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -648,6 +684,10 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// chain yet so we can test our preimage push retry logic. Instead, we
|
||||
// tick the expiry chan again to prompt another sweep.
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 2)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
if IsTaprootSwap(&swap.SwapContract) {
|
||||
preimage := <-server.preimagePush
|
||||
require.Equal(t, swap.Preimage, preimage)
|
||||
|
|
@ -678,6 +718,10 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// push. The test's mocked preimage channel is un-buffered, so our test
|
||||
// would hang if we pushed the preimage here.
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 2)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
<-ctx.Lnd.SignOutputRawChannel
|
||||
sweepTx := ctx.ReceiveTx()
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -685,6 +729,10 @@ func testPreimagePush(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// spend our sweepTx and assert that the swap succeeds.
|
||||
ctx.NotifySpend(sweepTx, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
// After receiving the spend ntfn the batch will start monitoring for
|
||||
// confs.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterConf(true, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
cfg.store.(*loopdb.StoreMock).AssertLoopOutState(loopdb.StateSuccess)
|
||||
status := <-statusChan
|
||||
require.Equal(
|
||||
|
|
@ -892,8 +940,6 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
return expiryChan
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error)
|
||||
|
||||
// Mock a successful signature verify to make sure we don't fail
|
||||
// creating the MuSig2 sweep.
|
||||
mockVerifySchnorrSigSuccess := func(pubKey *btcec.PublicKey, hash,
|
||||
|
|
@ -902,12 +948,33 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
errChan := make(chan error, 2)
|
||||
|
||||
batcherStore := sweepbatcher.NewStoreMock()
|
||||
|
||||
batcher := sweepbatcher.NewBatcher(
|
||||
lnd.WalletKit, lnd.ChainNotifier, lnd.Signer,
|
||||
mockMuSig2SignSweep, mockVerifySchnorrSigSuccess,
|
||||
lnd.ChainParams, batcherStore, cfg.store,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
tctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
|
||||
defer cancel()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := batcher.Run(tctx)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
errChan <- err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err := swap.execute(context.Background(), &executeConfig{
|
||||
statusChan: statusChan,
|
||||
blockEpochChan: blockEpochChan,
|
||||
timerFactory: timerFactory,
|
||||
sweeper: sweeper,
|
||||
batcher: batcher,
|
||||
cancelSwap: server.CancelLoopOutSwap,
|
||||
verifySchnorrSig: mockVerifySchnorrSigSuccess,
|
||||
}, ctx.Lnd.Height)
|
||||
|
|
@ -943,10 +1010,6 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
|
||||
ctx.NotifyConf(htlcTx)
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that we made a query to track our payment, as required for
|
||||
// preimage push tracking.
|
||||
trackPayment := ctx.AssertTrackPayment()
|
||||
|
|
@ -957,6 +1020,15 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// preimage is not revealed, we also do not expect a preimage push.
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
// The client should then register for a spend of the HTLC and attempt
|
||||
// to sweep it using the custom confirmation target.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterSpendNtfn(swap.htlc.PkScript)
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.AssertEpochListeners(1)
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 1)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// When using taproot htlcs the flow is different as we do reveal the
|
||||
// preimage before sweeping in order for the server to trust us with
|
||||
// our MuSig2 signing attempts.
|
||||
|
|
@ -988,6 +1060,10 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// Now when we report a new block and tick our expiry fee timer, and
|
||||
// fees are acceptably low so we expect our sweep to be published.
|
||||
blockEpochChan <- ctx.Lnd.Height + 2
|
||||
|
||||
err = ctx.Lnd.NotifyHeight(ctx.Lnd.Height + 2)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
expiryChan <- testTime
|
||||
|
||||
preimage = <-server.preimagePush
|
||||
|
|
@ -1010,6 +1086,10 @@ func TestLoopOutMuSig2Sweep(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
// spend our sweepTx and assert that the swap succeeds.
|
||||
ctx.NotifySpend(sweepTx, 0)
|
||||
|
||||
// After receiving the spend ntfn the batch will start monitoring for
|
||||
// confs.
|
||||
ctx.AssertRegisterConf(true, 3)
|
||||
|
||||
cfg.store.(*loopdb.StoreMock).AssertLoopOutState(loopdb.StateSuccess)
|
||||
status = <-statusChan
|
||||
require.Equal(t, status.State, loopdb.StateSuccess)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue