0cdddeb224 kernel: Move block tree db open to BlockManager constructor (TheCharlatan)
7fbb1bc44b kernel: Move block tree db open to block manager (TheCharlatan)
57ba59c0cd refactor: Remove redundant reindex check (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Before this change the block tree db was needlessly re-opened during startup when loading a completed snapshot. Improve this by letting the block manager open it on construction. This also simplifies the test code a bit.
The change was initially motivated to make it easier for users of the kernel library to instantiate a BlockManager that may be used to read data from disk without loading the block index into a cache.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 0cdddeb224🏪
achow101:
ACK 0cdddeb224
mzumsande:
re-ACK 0cdddeb224
Tree-SHA512: fe3d557a725367e549e6a0659f64259cfef6aaa565ec867d9a177be0143ff18a2c4a20dd57e35e15f97cf870df476d88c05b03b6a7d9e8d51c568d9eda8947ef
2656a5658c tests: add a test for the new blocksdir lock (Cory Fields)
bdc0a68e67 init: lock blocksdir in addition to datadir (Cory Fields)
cabb2e5c24 refactor: introduce a more general LockDirectories for init (Cory Fields)
1db331ba76 init: allow a new xor key to be written if the blocksdir is newly created (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
This probably should've been included in #12653 when `-blocksdir` was introduced. Credit TheCharlatan for noticing that it's missing.
This guards against 2 processes running with separate datadirs but the same blocksdir. I didn't add `walletdir` as I assume sqlite has us covered there.
It's not likely to happen currently, but may be more relevant in the future with applications using the kernel. Note that the kernel does not currently do any dir locking, but it should.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 2656a5658c 🏼
kevkevinpal:
ACK [2656a56](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31674/commits/2656a5658c14b43c32959db7235e9db55a17d4c8)
achow101:
ACK 2656a5658c
tdb3:
Code review and light test ACK 2656a5658c
Tree-SHA512: 3ba17dc670126adda104148e14d1322ea4f67d671c84aaa9c08c760ef778ca1936832c0dc843cd6367e09939f64c6f0a682b0fa23a5967e821b899dff1fff961
Make the block db open RAII style by calling it in the BlockManager
constructor.
Before this change the block tree db was needlessly re-opened during
startup when loading a completed snapshot. Improve this by letting the
block manager open it on construction. This also simplifies the test
code a bit.
The change was initially motivated to make it easier for users of the
kernel library to instantiate a BlockManager that may be used to read
data from disk without loading the block index into a cache.
A subsequent commit will add a .lock file to this dir at startup, meaning that
the blocksdir is never empty by the time the xor key is being read/written.
Ignore all hidden files when determining if this is the first run.
When the behavior was changes in a previous commit (caching `GetSerializeSize` and avoiding `AutoFile.tell`), (static)asserts were added to make sure the behavior was kept - to make sure reviewers and CI validates it.
We can safely remove them now.
Logs were also slightly modernized since they were trivial to do.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Co-authored-by: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>
For consistency `UNDO_DATA_DISK_OVERHEAD` was also extracted to avoid the constant's ambiguity.
Asserts were added to help with the review - they are removed in the next commit.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Similarly, `WriteBlockToDisk` wasn't really extracting a meaningful subset of the `SaveBlockToDisk` functionality, it's tied closely to the only caller (needs the header size twice, recalculated block serializes size, returns multiple branches, mutates parameter).
The inlined code should only differ in these parts (modernization will be done in other commits):
* renamed `blockPos` to `pos` in `SaveBlockToDisk` to match the parameter name;
* changed `return false` to `return FlatFilePos()`.
Also removed remaining references to `SaveBlockToDisk`.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
`UndoWriteToDisk` wasn't really extracting a meaningful subset of the `WriteUndoDataForBlock` functionality, it's tied closely to the only caller (needs the header size twice, recalculated undo serializes size, returns multiple branches, modifies parameter, needs documentation).
The inlined code should only differ in these parts (modernization will be done in other commits):
* renamed `_pos` to `pos` in `WriteUndoDataForBlock` to match the parameter name;
* inlined `hashBlock` parameter usage into `hasher << block.pprev->GetBlockHash()`;
* changed `return false` to `return FatalError`;
* capitalize comment.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
a2955f0979 validation: Use span for ImportBlocks paths (TheCharlatan)
20515ea3f5 validation: Use span for CalculateClaimedHeadersWork (TheCharlatan)
52575e96e7 validation: Use span for ProcessNewBlockHeaders (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee contiguous memory.
Take this opportunity to also change the argument of ImportBlocks previously taking a `std::vector` to a `std::span`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK a2955f0979 - no changes except further walking the ~file~ path of modernizing variable names.
maflcko:
ACK a2955f0979🕑
achow101:
ACK a2955f0979
danielabrozzoni:
ACK a2955f0979
Tree-SHA512: 8b07f4ad26e270b65600d1968cd78847b85caca5bfbb83fd9860389f26656b1d9a40b85e0990339f50403d18cedcd2456990054f3b8b0bedce943e50222d2709
Makes it friendlier for potential future users of the kernel library if
they do not store the headers in a std::vector, but can guarantee
contiguous memory.
This changed the node pruning logic and moved test/functional/feature_blockfilterindex_prune.py
to test/functional/feature_index_prune.py.
Please verify that:
1. I migrated the test correctly
2. The magic numbers in the test look fine
With respect to #2: I believe the magic numbers are wrong. I previously had to tweak them heavily
in commit 1278b31. I don't think I did it correctly then, and so I don't believe them to be correct now.
To summarize what this tweaking was: I changed the magic numbers in the test to work properly,
but I suspect that in changing them, I may have nullified what the test was testing.
It's very possible that the reason the test was failing was because of an underlying bug with the pruning
in elements which we have to fix, rather than just being an issue with the test itself.
fa895c7283 mingw: Document mode wbx workaround (MarcoFalke)
fa359255fe Add -blocksxor boolean option (MarcoFalke)
fa7f7ac040 Return XOR AutoFile from BlockManager::Open*File() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the *.dat files in the blocksdir store the data received from remote peers as-is. This may be problematic when a program other than Bitcoin Core tries to interpret them by accident. For example, an anti-virus program or other program may scan them and move them into quarantine, or delete them, or corrupt them. This may cause Bitcoin Core to fail a reorg, or fail to reply to block requests (via P2P, RPC, REST, ...).
Fix this, similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6650, by rolling a random XOR pattern over the dat files when writing or reading them.
Obviously this can only protect against programs that accidentally and unintentionally are trying to mess with the dat files. Any program that intentionally wants to mess with the dat files can still trivially do so.
The XOR pattern is only applied when the blocksdir is freshly created, and there is an option to disable it (on creation), so that people can disable it, if needed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa895c7283
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK fa895c7283
hodlinator:
ACK fa895c7283
Tree-SHA512: c92a6a717da83bc33a9b8671a779eeefde2c63b192362ba1d71e6535ee31d08e2802b74acc908345197de9daac6930e4771595ee25b09acd5a67f7ea34854720
Instead of constructing a new class every time a file operation is done,
construct them once for each of the undo and block file when a new
BlockManager is created.
In future, this might make it easier to introduce an abstract block
store.
fa14e1d9d5 log: Fix __func__ in LogError in blockstorage module (MarcoFalke)
fad59a2f0f log: LogError with FlatFilePos in UndoReadFromDisk (MarcoFalke)
aaaa3323f3 refactor: Mark IsBlockPruned const (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
These errors should never happen in normal operation. If they do,
knowing the `FlatFilePos` may be useful to determine if data corruption
happened. Also, handle the error `pos.IsNull()` as part of `OpenUndoFile`,
because it may as well have happened due to data corruption.
This mirrors the `LogError` behavior from `ReadBlockFromDisk`.
Also, two other fixup commits in this module.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [fa14e1d](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30428/commits/fa14e1d9d5c5dc44396a01583ae94480b7bc29ee)
tdb3:
cr and light test ACK fa14e1d9d5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa14e1d9d5. This should make logging clearer and more consistent
Tree-SHA512: abb492a919b4796698d1de0a7874c8eae355422b992aa80dcd6b59c2de1ee0d2949f62b3cf649cd62892976fee640358f7522867ed9d48a595d6f8f4e619df50
These errors should never happen. However, when they do happen, it is
useful to log the correct error location (function name).
For example, this fixes an incorrect "ConnectBlock()" in
"WriteUndoDataForBlock".
These errors should never happen in normal operation. If they do,
knowing the FlatFilePos may be useful to determine if data corruption
happened. Also, handle the error pos.IsNull() as part of OpenUndoFile,
because it may as well have happened due to data corruption.
This mirrors the LogError behavior from ReadBlockFromDisk.
8789dc8f31 doc: Add note to getblockfrompeer on missing undo data (Fabian Jahr)
4a1975008b rpc: Make pruneheight also reflect undo data presence (Fabian Jahr)
96b4facc91 refactor, blockstorage: Generalize GetFirstStoredBlock (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The function `GetFirstStoredBlock()` helps us find the first block for which we have data. So far this function only looked for a block with `BLOCK_HAVE_DATA`. However, this doesn't mean that we also have the undo data of that block, and undo data might be required for what a user would like to do with those blocks. One example of how this might happen is if some blocks were fetched using the `getblockfrompeer` RPC. Blocks fetched from a peer will have data but no undo data.
The first commit here allows `GetFirstStoredBlock()` to check for undo data as well by passing a parameter. This alone is useful for #29553 and I would use it there.
In the second commit I am applying the undo check to the RPCs that report `pruneheight` to the user. I find this much more intuitive because I think the user expects to be able to do all operations on blocks up until the `pruneheight` but that is not the case if undo data is missing. I personally ran into this once before and now again when testing for assumeutxo when I had used `getblockfrompeer`. The following commit adds test coverage for this change of behavior.
The last commit adds a note in the docs of `getblockfrompeer` that undo data will not be available.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 8789dc8f31
furszy:
Code review ACK 8789dc8f31.
stickies-v:
ACK 8789dc8f31
Tree-SHA512: 90ae8bdd07a496ade579aa25240609c61c9ed173ad38d30533f6c631fe674e5a41727478ade69ca4b71a571ad94c9da4b33ebba6b5d8821109313c2de3bdfb3d
GetFirstStoredBlock is generalized to check for any data status with a
status mask that needs to be passed as a parameter. To reflect this the
function is also renamed to GetFirstBlock.
Co-authored-by: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
