Moved GetOnlinePakKey to the scriptpubkey manager; the other blinding
stuff remains in the CWallet. At some point after the rebase we should
consider whether there's a better separation to be had between the PAK
related stuff now that we have wallet boxes.
This one took a little bit of work. Basically everywhere that Andy's new code
didn't compile, I looked for a similarly shaped line in the pre-PR diff between
Bitcoin and Elements and adjusted it in the same way. Was pretty typical; all
CAmounts become CAmountMaps, etc.
I then spent about 7 hours chasing down a coin selection failure in the blocksign
functional tests, which ultimately turned out to be a Core issue. I added a
stopgap fix (commented, search for "stopgap" in wallet.cpp), and opened the issue
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20347
There was also a bug where we were not estimating change output sizes correctly
in case we had massive blinded outputs, which I had to fix to get the functional
tests to pass.
asp: the point of this PR was to completely decouple libbitcoin_server from
bitcoin_tool; it removes $(LIBBITCOIN_SERVER) from the `elements_wallet_LDADD`.
I put this back in because our additional code related to pegin claiming makes
heavy use of methods from libbitcoin_server.
If we want to morally accept this PR then we need to do a nontrivial refactoring.
b007efdf19 Allow BnB when subtract fee from outputs (Andrew Chow)
db15e71e79 Use BnB when preset inputs are selected (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently we explicitly disable BnB when there are preset inputs selected or when the subtract fee from outputs option is enabled. This PR enables BnB for both cases.
Kind of an alternative to #17246 (implements the subtract fee from outputs part of it) and borrows a test from there too.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17290/commits/b007efdf1910db1d38671d6435d2f379bbf847d2
Sjors:
re-ACK b007efdf19
Tree-SHA512: 933276b09b2fa2ab43db7f0b98762f06f6f5fa8606195f96aca9fa1cb71ae4ee7156028dd482b1cada82ddd0996a9daf12ea5c152589fdf192cd96cbc51e99df
faf400077d scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers in test, bench (MarcoFalke)
fa821904bf scripted-diff: Rename test_bitcoin to test/setup_common (MarcoFalke)
fa8685d49e test: Use test_bitcoin setup in bench, Add test utils (MarcoFalke)
666696b673 test: Have segwit always active in (Basic)TestingSetup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Now that the fuzz tests can use the BasicTestingSetup [1], do the same for bench.
Also move some duplicate code to a common "test/util" module.
[1]: fuzz: Link BasicTestingSetup (shared with unit tests) #15504
ACKs for commit faf400:
jonatack:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15788/commits/faf400077d0144363c2dd24187431d958fb149a9
Tree-SHA512: 8ac5692e72cf50e460958f291643ae6b8bb04d5c1331ed50dce9eb4e9457e5a925144c532c42b360a26707e11eeece74aab27db8c76ab9a429b9dd7167e7cdc4
This commit does not change behavior. All it does is pass new function
parameters.
It is easiest to review this change with:
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.
a679109be4 Speed up knapsack_solver_test by not recreating wallet 100 times. (lucash.dev@gmail.com)
Pull request description:
Optimization of `knapsack_solver_test`by moving an expensive wallet creation to outside a 100x for loop.
On my (slow) machine:
```
before: 9.8s
after: 6.2s
--------------------
saved: 3.6s (36%)
```
This PR was split from #13050. Also see #10026.
Tree-SHA512: bde1a856b5f076a5845e14d1a924855c8c91742c3139b47903081289b21d01fef6f2d1fd8947058728a57de56f877bab3866af8cd1d25ba2daa44411752cdb2f
384273260a test: Add testing of value_ret for SelectCoinsBnB (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Fix that the early bailout optimization tests did not test the intended
selection because their utxo pool was polluted by the make_hard_case test
preceding. Note the code was tested, just not with the constructed case.
Tree-SHA512: 95f665525f5922f70f4c17708c0c09900f38d7a652b5bdd817e017ba7ff2865a6234edbd340064ffccc20d34048c45df86a4ac5f46dd8f4aab98834e71dc9d3c
Fix that the early bailout optimization tests did not test the actual
selection because their utxo pool was polluted by the make_hard_case test
preceding.
db983beba6 tests: Add lint-tests.sh which checks the test suite naming convention (practicalswift)
5fd864fe8a tests: Rename test suits not following the test suite naming convention (practicalswift)
7b4a296a71 tests: Add note about test suite naming convention (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Changes:
* Add note about test suite naming convention
* Fix exceptions
* Add regression test
Rationale:
* Consistent naming of test suites makes programmatic test running of specific tests/subsets of tests easier
* Explicit is better than implicit
Before this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-tests.sh
The test suite in file src/test/foo_tests.cpp should be named
"foo_tests". Please make sure the following test suites follow
that convention:
src/test/blockchain_tests.cpp:BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(blockchain_difficulty_tests, BasicTestingSetup)
src/test/prevector_tests.cpp:BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(PrevectorTests, TestingSetup)
src/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp:BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(coin_selection_tests, WalletTestingSetup)
src/wallet/test/crypto_tests.cpp:BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(wallet_crypto, BasicTestingSetup)
$
```
After this commit:
```
$ contrib/devtools/lint-tests.sh
$
```
Tree-SHA512: 7258ab9a6b9b8fc1939efadc619e2f2f02cfce8034c7f2e5dc5ecc769aa12e17f6fb8e363817feaf15c026c5b958b2574525b8d2d3f6be69658679bf8ceea9e9
Allows SelectCoinsMinConf and SelectCoins be able to switch between
using BnB or Knapsack for choosing coins.
Has SelectCoinsMinConf do the preprocessing necessary to support either
BnB or Knapsack. This includes calculating the filtering the effective
values for each input.
Uses BnB in CreateTransaction to find an exact match for the output.
If BnB fails, it will fallback to the Knapsack solver.
