Everyone is _not_ connected in this test, so on slow machines
where this check triggers (e.g. the CI boxes) the test incorrectly
fails. This was also a source of (very infrequent) spurious failures
during the rebase.
Several conflicts in the C++ code related to the new `flags` parameter
to `CheckSignature` and the corresponding function being renamed upstream
to `CheckSignatureECDSA`.
Several conflicts in the test harness as Steven sorta pulled the new
upstream ECKey module into the Python code, and the actual upstream
code was slightly different. Also needed to update the feature_taproot
code to always use the non-RANGEPROOF sighash since dynafed is not
enabled in the Taproot test.
Also had to pull the `set_wif` method out of `ECKey` and inline it because
otherwise it triggers a "circular inclusion" error between script.py (which
would pull in `base58_to_bytes` from address.py) and address.py (which now
pulls in some taproot EC related stuff from script.py).
Noticed that #960 does not test the "sighash rangeproof flag set but no
witnesses" case.
Somehow the CECKey impl is really broken if you want to set
a raw private key. Core master already has a new impl so I just
took that one and replaces the usages. This will probably be equivalent
with what would be rebased in at a later stage.
40fdb2a212 test: Fix Comment Typo in BitcoinTestFramework (Joel Klabo)
Pull request description:
Missing "override" in comment describing use of set_test_params
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK 40fdb2a212
Tree-SHA512: bf893a0d5f8dc86a3ec2eaf48cd7c0f0f832f3b3d254b3d99953336db7e294571b1d2c8686030bf8a27cbe67b1a85a54e53ebefb2e57d6d8d6ac864a15dce4e7
812baaa1f8 Switch to BIP341's suggested scheme for outputs without script (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
BIP341 suggests using Hash<sub>TapTweak</sub>(pubkey) to derive the tweak in case of key-only outputs. The functional test framework currently uses Hash<sub>TapTweak</sub>(pubkey || 0x00...00) instead. Change this.
There is no technical reason to prefer one over the other, but in case someone looks at it for inspiration, it's better to be consistent with the BIP.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 812baaa1f8
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20189/commits/812baaa1f804a8c848284759c75e5f9d19e942f8
Tree-SHA512: 02576c38776ec786255f49d7edecdb1ed8a9dcf0f547d58c23099588b4c3296edf279b103a6eb80e0f07d3c5ee9743f67d152f5244fd63adc6613b004f6969ed
bc4a230087 Remove redundant p2p lock tacking for tx download functional tests (Antoine Riard)
d3b5eac9a9 Add mutation for functional test test_preferred_inv (Antoine Riard)
06efb3163c Add functional test test_txid_inv_delay (Antoine Riard)
a07910abcd test: Makes wtxidrelay support a generic P2PInterface option (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
This is a simple functional test to increase coverage of #19988, checking that txid announcements from txid-relay peers are delayed by TXID_RELAY_DELAY, assuming we have at least another wtxid-relay peer.
You can verify new test with the following diff :
```
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index f14db379f..2a2805df5 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ void PeerManager::AddTxAnnouncement(const CNode& node, const GenTxid& gtxid, std
auto delay = std::chrono::microseconds{0};
const bool preferred = state->fPreferredDownload;
if (!preferred) delay += NONPREF_PEER_TX_DELAY;
- if (!gtxid.IsWtxid() && g_wtxid_relay_peers > 0) delay += TXID_RELAY_DELAY;
+ //if (!gtxid.IsWtxid() && g_wtxid_relay_peers > 0) delay += TXID_RELAY_DELAY;
const bool overloaded = !node.HasPermission(PF_RELAY) &&
m_txrequest.CountInFlight(nodeid) >= MAX_PEER_TX_REQUEST_IN_FLIGHT;
if (overloaded) delay += OVERLOADED_PEER_TX_DELAY;
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK bc4a230087
Tree-SHA512: 150e806bc5289feda94738756ab375c7fdd23c80c12bd417d3112043e26a91a717dc325a01079ebd02a88b90975ead5bd397ec86eb745c7870ebec379a8aa711
fa40168ab3 Remove unused bits from service flags enum (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove service bits that haven't been observed on the active network for years and won't ever be observed on the network with this meaning. Keeping this dead assignment in our source code forever doesn't add any value.
I somehow forgot to do this in commit fa0d0ff6e1.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa40168ab3
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa40168ab3
fanquake:
ACK fa40168ab3
Tree-SHA512: 376e5ac05940493cf2209fea60515c843e978c4b476f2524f6bf7a37a646d237c3ddcf6c0fa23641f9ba550f625609703d9b51b4be631a7f2a90e1092b557232
This one was pretty brutal, but ultimately nothing too surprising.
Just had to keep track of which wallets owned which blinding keys,
and in wallet_importprunedfunds.py I had to manually create a
Liquid address.
This commit adds signet support, which is a little bit silly/redundant for us :)
Was a surprisingly easy merge to handle, and hopefully in future Core is more
mindful of signed blocks when they are changing code architecture.
I had to change a couple lines of src/signet.cpp to add blank assets to the
CTxOuts and to find transaction input scriptWitnesses. No need to add any
other tx witness data (and the CAsset()s that I did add to make things compile
won't be used..) because signet will always have g_con_elementsmode off.
