We comment out a newly-added assert from the Bitcoin
side, because it's unclear how to replicate it
correctly in Elements.
Co-authored-by: Glenn Willen <gwillen@nerdnet.org>
The Elements 22 blinding logic has an edge case where when we drop change,
leaving only a single blinded output, we recompute a bunch of blinding
data to handle the potential for us to have 0 inputs and 1 output to blind.
(BlindTransaction will fail in this case because it cannot make the
transaction balance with only one output to mess with.)
In this recomputation, we dropped more data than we meant to, causing us
to incorrectly blind an output.
Modifies the getnewblockhex json rpc call to accept an array of
commitments instead of a single commitment.
Backwards compatibility is maintained by first attempting to parse as a
string for a singular commitment.
Messy merge conflicts because this PR backported some ad-hoc stuff from
upstream while keeping a few things that upstream deleted. Hopefully
reviewing is easier than doing this in the first place, since ultimately
all I did was delete code from one side or another of the conflicts.
(Ok, I also changed some boost optional stuff to std::optional, and had
to patch up a test file for test framework changes.)
When reviewing the detailed crypto, bear in mind that taptweaks, like all
hashes are the kind of crypto that cannot be subtly wrong -- it will either
fail very hard or be correct. And we have independent implementations in
C++ and Python that cross-check each other, si it's unlikely to be the former.
This forward-ports the new Taproot sighash but does not fix a couple
22-blocked TODOs related to the MissingDataBehavior enum. Should be fixed
in a followup commit.
One nontrivial change I had to make was feeding the genesis hash to SignTransaction
(the "global" one in script/sign.cpp) so that it could correctly compute
the sighash at signing time.
This commit addresses #20809.
We add an additional 'error' property in the result of 'validateaddress' in case the address is not valid that gives a short description of why the address in invalid. We also change the error message returned by 'getaddressinfo' in case the address is invalid.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20832 (1/1)
ELEMENTS: Merge conflicts resolved based on d6c85c5620 (from 22.0 rebase)
Divided tests in rpc_signmessage.py into 2 files wallet_signmessagewithaddress.py and
rpc_signmessagewithprivkey.py, latter one can run even when wallet is disabled.
82b6f89819 [style] Small style improvements to DNS parameters (Amiti Uttarwar)
4c89e24f64 [test] Test the delay before querying DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
6395c8ed56 [test] Test the interactions between -forcednsseed and -dnsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
6f6b7df6bd [init] Disallow starting up with conflicting paramters for -dnsseed and -forcednsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
26d0ffe4f2 [test] Test -forcednsseed causes querying DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
35851450a9 [test] Test the interactions between -connect and -dnsseed (Amiti Uttarwar)
75c05af361 [test] Test logic to query DNS seeds with block-relay-only connections (Amiti Uttarwar)
9c08719778 [test] Introduce test logic to query DNS seeds (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a DNS seed to the regtest chain params to enable testing the DNS seed querying logic of `CConnman::ThreadDNSAddressSeed` and relevant startup parameters. Adds coverage for the changes in #22013 (and then some).
The main behavioral change to bitcoind is that this PR disallows starting up with conflicting parameters for `-dnsseed` and `-forcednsseed`.
The tests include:
* parameter interactions of different combinations of `-connect`, `-dnsseed` and `-forcednsseed`
* the delay before querying DNS seeds depending on how many addresses are in the addrman
* the behavior of `-forcednsseed`
* skipping DNS querying if we have outbound full relay connections & not block-relay-only connections
Huge props to mzumsande for identifying the timing technique for testing successful connections before running `ThreadDNSAddressSeed` 🙌🏽
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
ACK 82b6f89819
jnewbery:
reACK 82b6f89819
Tree-SHA512: 9f0c29bfbf99426727e79c0a25606ae09deab91a92e3c5cee7f84c3ca7503a8ac9ab85a85c51841d40b164ef8c991326070f0b2f41d075fb7985df26f6e95d6d
This commit introduces a DNS seed to the regest chain params in order to add
coverage to the DNS querying logic.
The first test checks that we do not query DNS seeds if we are able to
succesfully connect to 2 outbound connections. Since we participate in ADDR
relay with those connections, including sending a GETADDR message during the
VERSION handshake, querying the DNS seeds is unnecessary.
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
a006d7d730 test: add logging to wallet_listtransactions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
47915b1187 test: remove unneeded/redundant code in wallet_listtransactions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fb6c6a7938 test: speedup wallet_listtransactions by whitelisting peers (immediate tx relay) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR improves the test `wallet_listtransactions.py` in three ways:
* speeds up runtime by a factor of 2-3x by using the good ol' immediate tx relay trick (`-whitelist=noban@127.0.0.1`)
* removes unneeded/redundant code
* adds log messages, mostly by turning comments into `self.log.info(...)` calls
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK a006d7d730
kristapsk:
ACK a006d7d730
Tree-SHA512: a91a19f5ebc4d05f0b96c5419683c4c57ac0ef44b64eeb8dd550bd72296fd3a2857a3ba83f755fe4b0b3bd06439973f226070b5d0ce2dee58344dae78cb50290
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
Does the bare minimum to introduce Taproot wallet support with CT; just
adds a CPubKey blinding_pubkey to the taproot destination variant and
updates some visitors.
In future when we define blech32 we will need to make sure we are using
that encoding and using the pubkey.
5730a43703 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d907 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
By whitelisting the peers via -whitelist, the inventory is transmissioned
immediately rather than on average every 5 seconds, speeding up the test by at
least a factor of two:
before:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m40.25s real 0m01.74s user 0m01.70s system
with this PR:
$ time ./wallet_listtransactions.py
...
0m14.93s real 0m01.68s user 0m01.87s system
This commit also moves the wallet_listtransactions tests into the < 30s group.
fa80e10d94 test: Add feature_taproot.py --previous_release (MarcoFalke)
85ccffa266 test: move releases download incantation to README (Sjors Provoost)
29d6b1da2a test: previous releases: add v0.20.1 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Disabling the new consensus code at runtime is fine, but potentially fragile and incomplete. Fix that by giving the option to run with a version that has been compiled without any taproot code.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK fa80e10
NelsonGaldeman:
tACK fa80e10d94
Tree-SHA512: 1a1feef823f08c05268759645a8974e1b2d39a024258f5e6acecbe25097aae3fa9302c27262978b40f1aa8e7b525b60c0047199010f2a5d6017dd6434b4066f0
4101ec9d2e doc: mention that we enforce port=0 in I2P (Vasil Dimov)
e0a2b390c1 addrman: reset I2P ports to 0 when loading from disk (Vasil Dimov)
41cda9d075 test: ensure I2P ports are handled as expected (Vasil Dimov)
4f432bd738 net: do not connect to I2P hosts on port!=0 (Vasil Dimov)
1f096f091e net: distinguish default port per network (Vasil Dimov)
aeac3bce3e net: change I2P seeds' ports to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
38f900290c net: change assumed I2P port to 0 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514, inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-815049933. They are mutually exclusive. Just one of them should be merged._
Change assumed ports for I2P to 0 (instead of the default 8333) as this is closer to what actually happens underneath with SAM 3.1 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-812632520, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21514#issuecomment-816564719).
Don't connect to I2P peers with advertised port != 0 (we don't specify a port to our SAM 3.1 proxy and it always connects to port = 0).
Note, this change:
* Keeps I2P addresses with port != 0 in addrman and relays them to others via P2P gossip. There may be non-bitcoin-core-22.0 peers using SAM 3.2 and for them such addresses may be useful.
* Silently refuses to connect to I2P hosts with port != 0. This is ok for automatically chosen peers from addrman. Not so ok for peers provided via `-addnode` or `-connect` - a user who specifies `foo.b32.i2p:1234` (non zero port) may wonder why "nothing is happening".
Fixes#21389
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4101ec9d2e
jonatack:
re-ACK 4101ec9d2e per `git range-diff efff9c3 0b0ee03 4101ec9`, built with DDEBUG_ADDRMAN, did fairly extensive testing on mainnet both with and without a peers.dat / -dnsseeds=0 to test boostrapping.
Tree-SHA512: 0e3c019e1dc05e54f559275859d3450e0c735596d179e30b66811aad9d5b5fabe3dcc44571e8f7b99f9fe16453eee393d6e153454dd873b9ff14907d4e6354fe
2feec3ce31 net: don't bind on 0.0.0.0 if binds are restricted to Tor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 2feec3ce31
jonatack:
utACK 2feec3ce31 per `git diff a004833 2feec3c`
hebasto:
ACK 2feec3ce31, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64):
Tree-SHA512: a04483af601706da928958b92dc560f9cfcc78ab0bb9d74414636eed1c6f29ed538ce1fb5a17d41ed82c9c9a45ca94899d0966e7ef93da809c9bcdcdb1d1f040
The semantic of `-bind` is to restrict the binding only to some address.
If not specified, then the user does not care and we bind to `0.0.0.0`.
If specified then we should honor the restriction and bind only to the
specified address.
Before this change, if no `-bind` is given then we would bind to
`0.0.0.0:8333` and to `127.0.0.1:8334` (incoming Tor) which is ok -
the user does not care to restrict the binding.
However, if only `-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary
`-bind=`) then we would bind to `addr:port` _and_ to `0.0.0.0:8333` in
addition.
Change the above to not do the additional bind: if only
`-bind=addr:port=onion` is given (without ordinary `-bind=`) then bind
to `addr:port` (only) and consider incoming connections to that as Tor
and do not advertise it. I.e. a Tor-only node.
This is part of the "UTXO Set Statistics" project in Core, which aims
to make things like "checking coin supply" faster. This stuff, and
related things in coinstats.cpp, have always been broken for Elements
in the sense that we consider only explicit outputs and we ignore
assets (so everything just gets added together to get a meaningless
total). It probably wouldn't be too hard to restrict this to only
consider policyAsset, but it's out of scope for a rebase IMO.
Also, I think this situation is fine .. I don't understand the motivation
for this or why Core is merging this when they refuse to merge an address
index .. but I guess we'll see if there are users who care about this data
and who care about it being meaningful on Elements.
Also, apologies for the big diff -- there were some mechanical changes
to deal with CT amounts, but most of the changes related to the difference
in how fees are accounted for. While I'm not thrilled with this PR, its
functional test is really good! So I think what I eventually came up with
is internally consistent.
There are a few layers of bullshit to this PR.
First, there is the fact that it adds a functional test gated on a new
config flag which is disabled by default, so it actually adds broken
code with no tests, waiting to ruin your day 520 PRs later when #21935
enables the broken test.
Second, the test appears to be superficially nonsensical because it
generates two transactions from different wallets and tries to compare
them for byte-for-byte equality, which doesn't make sense (at least)
because change outputs are randomly located...so something fishy is
going on.
Of course, in Elements the transactions are *not* equal half the time
because the outputs are permuted, which may have let me quickly figure
out the issue, except...
Third, there is a red herring of a bug where the two transactions have
slightly different feerates. This turns out to be caused by
CWallet::CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize using differently sized dummy
transactions depending on whether watchonly outputs are included (this
fact is conveniently disguised by #17211 slightly changing this logic;
this is an unmerged PR in Core that Elements has a backport of an old
version of). And the two wallets have different watchonly settings.
A sub-red-herring is the fact that this bug results in a discrepancy
of 0.25 vbytes, so it does not appear in Core but does appear in
Elements (there is a 3/16 probability that we should be so unlucky...
we are).
But this is all irrelevant, because...
Fourth, this test is actually super bullshit. The way it works is by
constructing a PSBT legitimately, saving this to disk, then re-"signs"
using the external signer interface by using a mock signer that
COMPLETELY REPLACES THE TRANSACTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION. So it doesn't
matter what the fee output looks like and it doesn't matter what the
order of the outputs. Core does not detect this malfeasance and
neither does Elements. For some reason, Core has a functional test
that explicitly checks that you can do this even though it is insane
and it is hard to think of non-malicious reasons to do it.
Fifth, while Elements fails to detect that its external signer is
actually changing the transaction out from under it, it DOES assume
that this won't happen. In CWallet::SignPSBT it blithely un-replaces
the transaction, which undermines the functional test.
Sixth, the original PR where this test was introduced has comments
locked, so anyone who spent six hours reverse-engineering this idiotic
broken test, and is still feeling charitable enough to discuss it with
the Core developors, can go pound sand.
Anyway, just disabled the broken test and move on with our lives.
