Followup to commit "MOVEONLY: CWallet transaction code out of
wallet.cpp/.h" that detaches and renames some CWalletTx methods, making
into them into standalone functions or CWallet methods instead.
There are no changes in behavior and no code changes that aren't purely
mechanical. It just gives spend and receive functions more consistent
names and removes the circular dependencies added by the earlier
MOVEONLY commit.
There are also no comment or documentation changes. Removed comments
from transaction.h are just migrated to spend.h, receive.h, and
wallet.h.
This PR adds a new functional test which unfortunately we need to disable
because it triggers an unrelated Elements bug (assertation failure when
attempting a large fundrawtransaction).
See https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/issues/880
48a0319bab Add a test that selects too large if BnB is used (Andrew Chow)
3e69939b78 Fail if maximum weight is too large (Andrew Chow)
51e2cd322c Have CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize also compute tx weight (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `Transaction too large` is calculated on the transaction that is returned from `CreateTransaction`. This does not make sense for when `CreateTransaction` is being used for `fundrawtransaction` as no signing occurs so the final returned transaction is missing signatures. Thus users may successfully fund a transaction but fail to broadcast it after it has been fully signed.
So instead we should figure out whether the transaction we are funding will be too large after it is signed. We can do this by having `CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize` also return the transaction weight and then comparing that weight against the maximum weight.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20536/commits/48a0319babb409cf486a9eb7c776810f70b06cb2
meshcollider:
utACK 48a0319bab
Xekyo:
utACK with nits 48a0319bab
Tree-SHA512: 1700c60b07f67e2d5c591c5ccd131ac9f1861fab3def961c3c9c4b3281ec1063fe8e4f0f7f1038cac72692340856406bcee8fb45c8104d2ad34357a0ec878ac7
31b136e580 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e580
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e580
theStack:
ACK 31b136e580❄️
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
I'm sorry, this should have been a few commits, but it got away from me
as the scope of this refactoring was not immediately obvious. It essentially
just moves code around so hopefully is not too hard to review. --asp
This restricts the `bumpfee` RPC, when given a feerate target, to unblinded
transactions, because this is the only way I could figure out quickly to
allow adding inputs to an already-created transaction. It appears to be the
strategy used by the `fundrawtransaction` RPC which has similar behaviour.
This should be fixed in a followup PR.
asp: the point of this PR was to completely decouple libbitcoin_server from
bitcoin_tool; it removes $(LIBBITCOIN_SERVER) from the `elements_wallet_LDADD`.
I put this back in because our additional code related to pegin claiming makes
heavy use of methods from libbitcoin_server.
If we want to morally accept this PR then we need to do a nontrivial refactoring.
