70398ae05b mapport: make ProcessPCP void (Antoine Poinsot)
9e6cba2988 mapport: remove unnecessary 'g_mapport_enabled' (Antoine Poinsot)
8fb45fcda0 mapport: remove unnecessary 'g_mapport_current' variable (Antoine Poinsot)
1b223cb19b mapport: merge DispatchMapPort into StartMapPort (Antoine Poinsot)
9bd936fa34 mapport: drop unnecessary function (Antoine Poinsot)
2a6536ceda mapport: rename 'use_pcp' to 'enable' (Antoine Poinsot)
c4e82b854c mapport: make 'enabled' and 'current' bool (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Followup to #31130, this does a couple cleanups to `src/mapport.*` to clarify the logic now that there is a single protocol option for port mapping.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 70398ae05b
TheCharlatan:
ACK 70398ae05b
Tree-SHA512: d9a3ab4fcd59a7cf4872415c40cc7ac3a98dfc5aa25e195d4df880bb588bac286c30c3471e9d9499de379a75f45dcd0a82019eba3cb9f342004ae1482d0ba075
9d2d9f7ce2 rpc: Include assumeutxo as a failure reason of rescanblockchain (Fabian Jahr)
595edee169 test, assumeutxo: import descriptors during background sync (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
d73ae603d4 rpc: Improve importdescriptor RPC error messages (Fabian Jahr)
27f99b6d63 validation: Don't assume m_chain_tx_count in GuessVerificationProgress (Fabian Jahr)
42d5d53363 interfaces: Add helper function for wallet on pruning (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A test that is added as part of #30455 uncovered this issue: The `GuessVerificationProgress` function is used during during descriptor import and relies on `m_chain_tx_count`. In #29370 an [`Assume` was added](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29370/commits/0fd915ee6bef63bb360ccc5c039a3c11676c38e3) expecting the `m_chaint_tx_count` to be set. However, as the test uncovered, `GuessVerificationProgress` is called with background sync blocks that have `m_chaint_tx_count = 0` when they have not been downloaded and processed yet.
The simple fix is to remove the `Assume`. Users should not be thrown off by the `Internal bug detected` error. The behavior of `importdescriptor` is kept consistent with the behavior for blocks missing due to pruning.
The test by alfonsoromanz is cherry-picked here to show that the [CI errors](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5110045812195328?logs=ci#L2535) should be fixed by this change.
This PR also improves error messages returned by the `importdescriptors` and `rescanblockchain` RPCs. The error message now changes depending on the situation of the node, i.e. if pruning is happening or an assumutxo backgroundsync is active.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9d2d9f7ce2
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 9d2d9f7ce2
furszy:
Code review ACK 9d2d9f7ce2
Tree-SHA512: b841a9b371e5eb8eb3bfebca35645ff2fdded7a3e5e06308d46a33a51ca42cc4c258028c9958fbbb6cda9bb990e07ab8d8504dd9ec6705ef78afe0435912b365
2656a5658c tests: add a test for the new blocksdir lock (Cory Fields)
bdc0a68e67 init: lock blocksdir in addition to datadir (Cory Fields)
cabb2e5c24 refactor: introduce a more general LockDirectories for init (Cory Fields)
1db331ba76 init: allow a new xor key to be written if the blocksdir is newly created (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
This probably should've been included in #12653 when `-blocksdir` was introduced. Credit TheCharlatan for noticing that it's missing.
This guards against 2 processes running with separate datadirs but the same blocksdir. I didn't add `walletdir` as I assume sqlite has us covered there.
It's not likely to happen currently, but may be more relevant in the future with applications using the kernel. Note that the kernel does not currently do any dir locking, but it should.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 2656a5658c 🏼
kevkevinpal:
ACK [2656a56](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31674/commits/2656a5658c14b43c32959db7235e9db55a17d4c8)
achow101:
ACK 2656a5658c
tdb3:
Code review and light test ACK 2656a5658c
Tree-SHA512: 3ba17dc670126adda104148e14d1322ea4f67d671c84aaa9c08c760ef778ca1936832c0dc843cd6367e09939f64c6f0a682b0fa23a5967e821b899dff1fff961
81cea5d4ee Ensure m_tip_block is never ZERO (Sjors Provoost)
e058544d0e Make m_tip_block an std::optional (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31297#discussion_r1844244309
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 81cea5d4ee
tdb3:
code review re ACK 81cea5d4ee
l0rinc:
ACK 81cea5d4ee
Tree-SHA512: 31a75ba29e3d567bab32e4e7925a419d9d7a4d2d85ed1c1012116d8d22adc14d31d5b4ce5f6c499c994188dcd26a01cced05be74f94c892fc90ae17a6783a472
c991cea1a0 Remove processNewBlock() from mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
9a47852d88 Remove getTransactionsUpdated() from mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
bfc4e029d4 Remove testBlockValidity() from mining interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
There are three methods in the mining interface that can be dropped. The Template Provider doesn't need them and other application should probably not use them either.
1. `processNewBlock()` was added in 7b4d3249ce, but became unnecessary with the introduction of interfaces::BlockTemplate::submitSolution in 7b4d3249ce.
Dropping it was suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30200#issuecomment-2404460342
2. `getTransactionsUpdated()`: this is used in the implementation of #31003 `waitFeesChanged`. It's not very useful generically because the mempool updates very frequently.
3. `testBlockValidity()`: it might be useful for mining application to have a way to check the validity of a block template they modified, but the Stratum v2 Template Provider doesn't do that, and this method is a bit brittle (e.g. the block needs to build on the tip).
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK c991cea1a0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c991cea1a0. Since last review, just rebased to avoid conflicts in surrounding code, and edited a commit message
tdb3:
code review ACK c991cea1a0
Tree-SHA512: 2138e54f920b26e01c068b24498c6a210c5c4358138dce0702ab58185d9ae148a18f04c97ac9f043646d40f8031618d80a718a176b1ce4779c237de6fb9c4a67
facb4d010c refactor: Move GuessVerificationProgress into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the function is standalone, which means any passed-in data like `TxData` or the block pointer needs to be taken from the `ChainstateManager` and passed in. This is currently verbose and may become even more verbose if the function is reworked in the future. As the function can not be called without a `ChainstateManager` in production code anyway, make it a member function on the class.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK facb4d010c. Nice cleanup, that should make this code less awkward to work with
TheCharlatan:
ACK facb4d010c
danielabrozzoni:
reACK facb4d010c
Tree-SHA512: b17977e12cd7c6e308c47e6a1aa920acecd4442696e46d1f30bd7c201e9898ca2d581ff0bf2cc9f7334e146c1b0c50925adb849c8c17f65dcdf6877be1c5f776
processNewBlock was added in 7b4d3249ce, but became unnecessary with the introduction of interfaces::BlockTemplate::submitSolution in 7b4d3249ce.
getTransactionsUpdated() is only needed by the implementation of waitFeesChanged() (not yet part of the interface).
f86678156a Check leaves size maximum in MerkleComputation (Sjors Provoost)
4d57288246 refactor: use CTransactionRef in submitSolution (Sjors Provoost)
2e81791d90 Drop TransactionMerklePath default position arg (Sjors Provoost)
39d3b538e6 Rename merkle branch to path (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR implements the refactors suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30955#pullrequestreview-2354931253.
ACKs for top commit:
tdb3:
code review re-ACK f86678156a
itornaza:
re ACK f86678156a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f86678156a only changes since last review are a whitespace change and adding an Assume statement to check for size_t -> uint32_t overflows
Tree-SHA512: 661b5d5d0e24b2269bf33ab1484e37c36e67b32a7796d77ca3b1856d3043378b081ad43c32a8638b46fa8c0de51c823fd9747dd9fc81f958f20d327bf330a47c
To avoid future code changes from reintroducing the ambiguity fixed
by the previous commit, mark m_tip_block private and Assume that
it's not set to uint256::ZERO.
Providing a script for the coinbase transaction is only done in test code
and for CPU solo mining.
Production miners use the getblocktemplate RPC which omits the coinbase
transaction entirely from its block template, leaving it to external (pool)
software to construct it.
A coinbase script can still be passed via BlockCreateOptions instead.
A temporary overload is added so that the test can be modified in the
next commit.
40e5f26a3f mapport: remove dead code in DispatchMapPort (Antoine Poinsot)
38fdf7c1fb mapport: drop outdated comments (Antoine Poinsot)
b7b2435290 doc: add release note for #31130 (Antoine Poinsot)
1b6dec98da depends: drop miniupnpc (Antoine Poinsot)
953533d021 doc: remove mentions of UPnP (Antoine Poinsot)
94ad614482 ci: remove UPnP options (Antoine Poinsot)
a9598e5eaa build: drop miniupnpc dependency (Antoine Poinsot)
a5fcfb7385 interfaces: remove now unused 'use_upnp' arg from 'mapPort' (Antoine Poinsot)
038bbe7b20 daemon: remove UPnP support (Antoine Poinsot)
844770b05e qt: remove UPnP settings (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This PR removes UPnP IGD support and drops our [miniupnp](https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp) dependency.
Miniupnpc is a C library (somewhat) maintained by a single person which had several vulnerabilities in the past (a couple dozens are listed [here](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=miniupnp)), some of which directly affected our software ([RCE in 2015](https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/07/03/disclose_upnp_rce/), [OOM in 2020](https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/07/31/disclose-upnp-oom/)).
The main purpose of this functionality is to have more (non-data-center) reachable nodes on the network. For a non-technical user running Bitcoin Core at home, the software would automatically open a port on their router to receive incoming connections. This way, users not able to manually open a port on their router would still provide the network with more resources and enhance its diversity.
However, due to past vulnerabilities (and a worry about unknown future ones) in miniupnpc this feature was disabled by default in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6795. Having it disabled by default kills (most of?) the purpose of having this functionality in the first place: someone technical enough to understand the `-upnp` startup option or the "enable UPnP" setting is most likely able to open a port on his box in the first place.
In addition, laanwj implemented PCP with a NAT-PMP fallback directly in Bitcoin Core in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30043. If we ever want to re-enable automatic NAT traversal by default in Bitcoin Core, this is the best option (and in my opinion the only sane one). The NAT-PMP fallback makes it so compatibility shouldn't be (much of) an issue.
On balance, i believe that keeping this functionality and this barely maintained C dependency has higher costs than benefits. Therefore i propose that we get rid of it.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 40e5f26a3f
1440000bytes:
Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31130/commits/40e5f26a3ff77e50df808f6f850c617aec2df203
laanwj:
Code review ACK 40e5f26a3f
i-am-yuvi:
Tested ACK 40e5f26a3f
Tree-SHA512: 9ea48662775510f5ec6de7af65790f7c8d211603398e9d8c634a86387be81b28081419a95b4d6680d3d7fe6a9f16cec99f16516548201dc7e49781909899a657
4feaa28728 refactor: Rely on returned value of GetCoin instead of parameter (Lőrinc)
46dfbf169b refactor: Return optional of Coin in GetCoin (Lőrinc)
e31bfb26c2 refactor: Remove unrealistic simulation state (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
While reviewing [the removal of the unreachable combinations from the Coin cache logic](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673#discussion_r1721727681), we've noticed that the related tests often [reflect impossible states](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673/files#r1740154464).
Browsing the Coin cache refactoring history revealed that migrating `bool GetCoin` to `optional<Coin> GetCoin` was [already proposed a few times before](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18746#issuecomment-842393167).
This refactor makes certain invalid states impossible, reducing the possibility of errors and making the code easier to understand. This will let us remove test code that exercises the impossible states as well.
The PR is done in multiple small steps, first swapping the new `optional` return value, slowly strangling out the usages of the return parameter, followed by the removal of the parameter.
Most of the invalid test states were still kept, except for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673/files#r1748087322, where the new design prohibits invalid usage and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673/files#r1749350258 was just marked with a TODO, will be removed in a follow-up PR.
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
re-ACK 4feaa28728
achow101:
ACK 4feaa28728
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4feaa28728
theStack:
Code-review ACK 4feaa28728
Tree-SHA512: 818d60b2e97f58c489a61120fe761fb67a08dffbefe7a3fce712d362fc9eb8c2cced23074f1bec55fe71c616a3561b5a8737919ad6ffb2635467ec4711683df7
