c8e6771af0 test: restrict multiple CLI arguments (naiyoma)
8838c4f171 common/args.h: automate check for multiple cli commands (naiyoma)
Pull request description:
This PR is a continuation of the validation suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27815) to ensure that only one Request Handler can be specified at a time.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
reACK c8e6771.
achow101:
ACK c8e6771af0
tdb3:
cr re ACK c8e6771af0
Tree-SHA512: f4fe036fee342a54f1a7ac702ac35c40bf3d420fde6ab16313a75327292d5ee5c8ece1be9f852a13fcf73da1148b143b37b4894e294052abdde6eefb2e8c6f3f
c7376babd1 doc: Clarify distinction between util and common libraries in libraries.md (Ryan Ofsky)
4f74c59334 util: Move util/string.h functions to util namespace (Ryan Ofsky)
4d05d3f3b4 util: add TransactionError includes and namespace declarations (Ryan Ofsky)
680eafdc74 util: move fees.h and error.h to common/messages.h (Ryan Ofsky)
02e62c6c9a common: Add PSBTError enum (Ryan Ofsky)
0d44c44ae3 util: move error.h TransactionError enum to node/types.h (Ryan Ofsky)
9bcce2608d util: move spanparsing.h to script/parsing.h (Ryan Ofsky)
6dd2ad4792 util: move spanparsing.h Split functions to string.h (Ryan Ofsky)
23cc8ddff4 util: move HexStr and HexDigit from util to crypto (TheCharlatan)
6861f954f8 util: move util/message to common/signmessage (Ryan Ofsky)
cc5f29fbea build: move memory_cleanse from util to crypto (Ryan Ofsky)
5b9309420c build: move chainparamsbase from util to common (Ryan Ofsky)
ffa27af24d test: Add check-deps.sh script to check for unexpected library dependencies (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Remove `fees.h`, `errors.h`, and `spanparsing.h` from the util library. Specifically:
- Move `Split` functions from `util/spanparsing.h` to `util/string.h`, using `util` namespace for clarity.
- Move remaining spanparsing functions to `script/parsing.h` since they are used for descriptor and miniscript parsing.
- Combine `util/fees.h` and `util/errors.h` into `common/messages.h` so there is a place for simple functions that generate user messages to live, and these functions are not part of the util library.
Motivation for this change is that the util library is a dependency of the kernel, and we should remove functionality from util that shouldn't be called by kernel code or kernel applications. These changes should also improve code organization and make functions easier to discover. Some of these same moves are (or were) part of #28690, but did not help with code organization, or made it worse, so it is better to move them and clean them up in the same PR so code only has to change one time.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c7376babd1
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK c7376babd1
hebasto:
re-ACK c7376babd1.
Tree-SHA512: 5bcef16c1255463b1b69270548711e7ff78ca0dd34e300b95e3ca1ce52ceb34f83d9ddb2839e83800ba36b200de30396e504bbb04fa02c6d0c24a16d06ae523d
24bc46c83b cli: Add warning for duplicate port definition (tdb3)
e208fb5d3b cli: Sanitize ports in rpcconnect and rpcport (tdb3)
Pull request description:
Adds invalid port detection to bitcoin-cli for -rpcconnect and -rpcport.
In addition to detecting malformed/invalid ports (e.g. those outside of the 16-bit port range, not numbers, etc.), bitcoin-cli also now considers usage of port 0 to be invalid. bitcoin-cli previously considered port 0 to be valid and attempted to use it to reach bitcoind.
Functional tests were added for invalid port detection as well as port prioritization.
Additionally, a warning is provided when a port is specified in both -rpcconnect and -rpcport.
This PR is an alternate approach to PR #27820 (e.g. SplitHostPort is unmodified).
Considered an alternative to 127.0.0.1 being specified in functional tests, but at first glance, this might need an update to test_framework/util.py (e.g. rpc_url), which might be left to a future PR.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
light code review ACK 24bc46c83b
achow101:
ACK 24bc46c83b
cbergqvist:
re ACK 24bc46c83b
Tree-SHA512: c83ab6a30a08dd1ac8b368a7dcc2b4f23170f0b61dd67ffcad7bcda05096d333bcb9821fba11018151f55b2929c0a333bfec15b8bb863d83f41fc1974c6efca5
There are no changes to behavior. Changes in this commit are all additions, and
are easiest to review using "git diff -U0 --word-diff-regex=." options.
Motivation for this change is to keep util functions with really generic names
like "Split" and "Join" out of the global namespace so it is easier to see
where these functions are defined, and so they don't interfere with function
overloading, especially since the util library is a dependency of the kernel
library and intended to be used with external code.
cbc6c440e3 doc: add comments and release-notes for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
e7ee80dcf2 rpc: JSON-RPC 2.0 should not respond to "notifications" (Matthew Zipkin)
bf1a1f1662 rpc: Avoid returning HTTP errors for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
466b90562f rpc: Add "jsonrpc" field and drop null "result"/"error" fields (Matthew Zipkin)
2ca1460ae3 rpc: identify JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
a64a2b77e0 rpc: refactor single/batch requests (Matthew Zipkin)
df6e3756d6 rpc: Avoid copies in JSONRPCReplyObj() (Matthew Zipkin)
09416f9ec4 test: cover JSONRPC 2.0 requests, batches, and notifications (Matthew Zipkin)
4202c170da test: refactor interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2960
Bitcoin Core's JSONRPC server behaves with a special blend of 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 behaviors. This introduces compliance issues with more strict clients. There are the major misbehaviors that I found:
- returning non-200 HTTP codes for RPC errors like "Method not found" (this is not a server error or an HTTP error)
- returning both `"error"` and `"result"` fields together in a response object.
- different error-handling behavior for single and batched RPC requests (batches contain errors in the response but single requests will actually throw HTTP errors)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15495 added regression tests after a discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15381 to kinda lock in our RPC behavior to preserve backwards compatibility.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12435 was an attempt to allow strict 2.0 compliance behind a flag, but was abandoned.
The approach in this PR is not strict and preserves backwards compatibility in a familiar bitcoin-y way: all old behavior is preserved, but new rules are applied to clients that opt in. One of the rules in the [JSON RPC 2.0 spec](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#request_object) is that the kv pair `"jsonrpc": "2.0"` must be present in the request. Well, let's just use that to trigger strict 2.0 behavior! When that kv pair is included in a request object, the [response will adhere to strict JSON-RPC 2.0 rules](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#response_object), essentially:
- always return HTTP 200 "OK" unless there really is a server error or malformed request
- either return `"error"` OR `"result"` but never both
- same behavior for single and batch requests
If this is merged next steps can be:
- Refactor bitcoin-cli to always use strict 2.0
- Refactor the python test framework to always use strict 2.0 for everything
- Begin deprecation process for 1.0/1.1 behavior (?)
If we can one day remove the old 1.0/1.1 behavior we can clean up the rpc code quite a bit.
ACKs for top commit:
cbergqvist:
re ACK cbc6c440e3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cbc6c440e3. Just suggested changes since the last review: changing uncaught exception error code from PARSE_ERROR to MISC_ERROR, renaming a few things, and adding comments.
tdb3:
re ACK for cbc6c440e3
Tree-SHA512: 0b702ed32368b34b29ad570d090951a7aeb56e3b0f2baf745bd32fdc58ef68fee6b0b8fad901f1ca42573ed714b150303829cddad4a34ca7ad847350feeedb36
