350e034e64 consensus: don't call GetBlockPos in ReadBlockFromDisk without lock (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Commit ccd8ef65 "Reduce cs_main lock in ReadBlockFromDisk, only read GetBlockPos under the lock" in #11281 moved the cs_main lock from caller to `ReadBlockFromDisk()` for calling `CBlockIndex::GetBlockPos()`, but the second invocation doesn't have the lock, and IIUC there is no guarantee the compiler can know if state has changed.
Use the `blockPos` local variable instead, rename it to `block_pos`, and make it const.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 350e034e64
theStack:
Code-review ACK 350e034e64
promag:
Code review ACK 350e034e64.
Tree-SHA512: 0df0614ab1876885c85f7b53c604a759a29008da8027e95503b4726d2b820ec6d27546020c613337ff954406e01cb5d191978ba4a12124052fed6e1b0e9a226f
e4709c7b56 Start using init makeNode, makeChain, etc methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Use `interfaces::Init::make*` methods instead of `interfaces::Make*` functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different executable without having to change any code. (So for example `bitcoin-gui` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that communicates with a `bitcoin-node` subprocess, while `bitcoin-qt` can make an `interfaces::Node` pointer that controls node code in the same process.)
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
reACK e4709c7b56
achow101:
ACK e4709c7b56
benthecarman:
utACK e4709c7b56
Tree-SHA512: 580c1979dbb2ef444157c8e53041e70d15ddeee77e5cbdb34f70b6d228cc2d2fe3843825f172da84e506200c58f7e0932f7cd4c006bb5058c1f4e43259394834
Surprisingly easy to do. Almost all of the diff resolution was mechanically
* replacing boost::variant with std::variant
* replacing Optional with std::optional
* then replacing `nullopt` with `std::nullopt`
* updating the RPC functions for the new RPCArg::Default type
* update the tests/ directory to make new (since 22) tests use arrays for
createrawtransaction outputs
* other ad-hoc changes to function parameters etc (not too many of these)
I had to "really" change the code in PrecomputePSBTData, which was introduced
in 22.0 and affected by PSET, but this function was like 8 lines long so it
was easy.
Reviewing the diff may be a bit difficult because of the mix of mechanical
changes and ad-hoc things. Probably the most straightforward thing to do
is to redo the merge, `sed -i` to fix the boost::variant and Optional stuff,
then diff the remaining conflicts against this commit.
TODO: grep for `blindpsbt` and you will see that this RPC is still referenced
in documentation and help text even though it was deleted. Need to fix this
in 0.21 in a separate PR.
5c5d0b6264 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b6264 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
Use interfaces::Init::make* methods instead of interfaces::Make*
functions, so interfaces can be constructed differently in different
executables without having to change any code. (So for example
bitcoin-gui can make an interfaces::Node pointer that communicates with
a bitcoin-node subprocess, while bitcoin-qt can make an interfaces::Node
pointer that starts node code in the same process.)
f685a13bef doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f08 refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef
rajarshimaitra:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22528/commits/f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
779e638ca9 coinstats: Add comments for new coinstatsindex values (Fabian Jahr)
5b3d4e724f Index: Improve logging in coinstatsindex (Fabian Jahr)
d4356d4e48 rpc: Block until synced if coinstatsindex is used in gettxoutsetinfo (Fabian Jahr)
a5f6791139 rpc: Add missing gettxoutsetinfo help docs (Fabian Jahr)
01386bfd88 Index: Return early from failed coinstatsindex init (Fabian Jahr)
1e3842385b index: Use batch writing in coinstatsindex WriteBlock (Fabian Jahr)
fb65dde147 scripted-diff: Fix coinstats data member names (Fabian Jahr)
8ea8c927ac index: Avoid unnecessary type casts in coinstatsindex (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This is a collection of smaller follow-ups to #19521, addressing several post-merge review comments.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 779e638ca9
jonatack:
re-ACK 779e638ca9 diff since last review involves doc changes only; rebased to current master and verified clean debug build/no silent conflicts, unit tests, and feature_coinstatsindex functional test
laanwj:
Code review ACK 779e638ca9
Talkless:
re-utACK 779e638ca9 after cosmetic changes.
Tree-SHA512: cb0d038d230c582d7fe3041c89b1e04d39971fab3739d540c609cf826754c6c513b12ded08ac92180aec7a9d7a70114ece50357bd1a902de4adaae9f30b8d699
This introduces Taproot wallet support. I fixed all the merge conflicts
and ensured that the tests pass, but this is still using the old sighash
(before Russell/Sanket/I redid it) so is not actually production ready.
Will be fixed when we bring Elements #1002 in.
faa54e3757 Move pblocktree global to BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
fa27f03b49 Move LoadBlockIndexDB to BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The block tree db is used within BlockManager to write and read the block index, so make the db global a member variable of BlockManager.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK faa54e3757 ([`jamesob/ackr/22371.1.MarcoFalke.move_pblocktree_global_t`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22371.1.MarcoFalke.move_pblocktree_global_t))
theStack:
re-ACK faa54e3757🥧
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faa54e3757. I was thinking this looked like a change Carl would like, so no surprised he [Mega-acked](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22371#pullrequestreview-696450475)
Tree-SHA512: 1b7badbf503d53f5d4dbd9ed8f2e5c1ebfe48102665197048cc9e37bc87b5cec5f2277f3aae9f73a1095bfe879b19d288286ca3daa28031f5f1b64b1184439a9
This commit fixes some slightly unexpected behaviour when:
- there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx")
- BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid
as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx")
Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with
relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of
the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers,
in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from
setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of
wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction
(the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from
the new tx).
Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool
transaction in this case.
Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a
transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the
transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been
broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again,
meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed
from m_unbroadcast_txids.
Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the
transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until
the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction
(or perhaps indefinitely).
Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added
to the mempool.
This is part of the "UTXO Set Statistics" project in Core, which aims
to make things like "checking coin supply" faster. This stuff, and
related things in coinstats.cpp, have always been broken for Elements
in the sense that we consider only explicit outputs and we ignore
assets (so everything just gets added together to get a meaningless
total). It probably wouldn't be too hard to restrict this to only
consider policyAsset, but it's out of scope for a rebase IMO.
Also, I think this situation is fine .. I don't understand the motivation
for this or why Core is merging this when they refuse to merge an address
index .. but I guess we'll see if there are users who care about this data
and who care about it being meaningful on Elements.
Also, apologies for the big diff -- there were some mechanical changes
to deal with CT amounts, but most of the changes related to the difference
in how fees are accounted for. While I'm not thrilled with this PR, its
functional test is really good! So I think what I eventually came up with
is internally consistent.
