FIXME: we disable standardness checks for the non-PAK node in the PAK tests.
This is because of a bug in Elements which causes non-PAK nodes to reject
pegouts for standardness reasons. Need to fix it after the rebase.
0c62e3aa73 New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
fa912a8ad5 doc: move-only ActivateBestChain doxygen comment to header (MarcoFalke)
fa99efd054 doc: ActivateBestChainStep return value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It will always return true, unless a system error such as #15305 occurred
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa912a8ad5
Tree-SHA512: d439da844a467f9705014b946d7d987fb62cb63fe6a325b2fdbbb73a6578fc0ade3f60892044f02face43948204fc4e3c9fa70d108233d4ca8eef27984059689
5ce822efbe Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful.
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16421/commits/5ce822efbe45513ce3517c1ca731ac6d6a0c3b54
ajtowns:
ACK 5ce822efbe ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense
sipa:
Code review ACK 5ce822efbe. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have.
Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
3109a1f948 refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeaders (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Builds on #16774, this change avoids locking `cs_main` in `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` when the tip has changed - in this case the removed lock was necessary to just log a message.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 31be6d319fa122804f72fa813cec5ed041dd7e4aef3c1921124a1f03016925c43cd4d9a272d80093e77fa7600e3506ef47b7bb821afcbffe01e6be9bceb6dc00
