To resolve the `ConstructTransaction` conflict I reverted to the existing code
then manually applied the diff (it adds a parameter then adds a giant pile of
code to the input loop).
This PR reduced the minrelayfee for Elements, but also brought in some
changes from upstream which I mostly just didn't take (since we've
already brought them in, in earlier parts of this rebase).
FIXME: we disable standardness checks for the non-PAK node in the PAK tests.
This is because of a bug in Elements which causes non-PAK nodes to reject
pegouts for standardness reasons. Need to fix it after the rebase.
Also uncommented a bunch of PSBT functional tests (had to add a fee output
to one transaction, update `find_output` to skip CT outputs, and change two
constant checks at the end of the commented-out section).
5a4d61169 Test raw transaction peg-in (Andrew Chow)
ac6f052a6 Have find_vout_for_address only get non-confidential address when using elements chain (Andrew Chow)
cefe40767 Allow specifying peg-in info in raw transaction RPC inputs (Andrew Chow)
42babb81f Refactor peg-in input construction into its own function in rpc/rawtransaction.cpp (Andrew Chow)
a90d1521c Refactor peg-in witness construction to it's own function (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds to `createrawtransaction` the fields `pegin_bitcoin_tx`, `pegin_txout_proof`, and `pegin_claim_script` so that raw transactions can contain peg-in inputs too.
Since `ConstructTransaction` is used by `createpsbt` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` but those should not support peg-ins yet (the peg-in data should go into PSBT fields for peg-ins but those don't exist yet), an argument is added to it to optionally reject peg-in data.
Tree-SHA512: fcf3e4be87f92bfc5b00321bec405001d98615cefb76118345e0c759c6bfcb90b6050735960b6fbdbe26479fa11c9273f9963873a8adc1fbad9ed31dc7953ee0
ea4cc3a7b3 Truly decouple wallet from chainparams for -fallbackfee (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Before it was 0 by default for main and 20000 for test and regtest.
Now it is 0 by default for all chains, thus there's no need to call Params().
Also now the default for main is properly documented.
Suggestion for release notes:
-fallbackfee was 0 (disabled) by default for the main chain, but 20000 by default for the test chains. Now it is 0 by default for all chains. Testnet and regtest users will have to add fallbackfee=20000 to their configuration if they weren't setting it and they want it to keep working like before.
Should I propose them to the wiki for the release notes or only after merge?
For more context, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16402#issuecomment-515701042
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea4cc3a7b3
Tree-SHA512: fdfaba5d813da4221e405e0988bef44f3856d10f897a94f9614386d14b7716f4326ab8a6646e26d41ef3f4fa61b936191e216b1b605e9ab0520b0657fc162e6c
Before it was 0 by default for main and 20000 for test and regtest.
Now it is 0 by default for all chains, thus there's no need to call Params().
Also now the default for main is properly documented
fa69588537 test: Make PORT_MIN in test runner configurable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed when some ports in the port range are used by other processes. Note that simply assigning the ports dynamically does not work:
* We spin up several nodes per test (each node gets its own port)
* We run several tests in parallel
So to avoid nodes from different tests colliding on ports, the port assignment must be deterministic (can not be dynamic).
Fixes: #10869
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa69588537 -- diff looks correct
promag:
ACK fa69588537.
Tree-SHA512: e79adb015e7de79064e2d14336c38bc9672bd779ad6c52917721897e73f617c39d32c068a369c26670002a6c4ab95a71ef3a6878ebdd9710e02f410e2f7bcd14
333317ce6b test: Test that low difficulty chain fork is rejected (MarcoFalke)
fa31dc1bf4 test: Pass down correct chain name in tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To prevent OOM, Bitcoin Core will reject chain forks at low difficulty by default. This is the only use-case of checkpoints, so add a test for it to make sure the feature works as expected. If it didn't work, checkpoints would have no use-case and we might as well remove them
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Thanks for adding the node 1 example. Code review ACK 333317c
Tree-SHA512: 90dffa540d0904f3cffb61d2382b1a26f84fe9560b7013e4461546383add31a8757b350616a6d43217c59ef7b8b2a1b62bb3bab582c679cbb2c660a782ce7be1
e78aaf41f4 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.
CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.
This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e78aaf41f4 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
ariard:
ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
MarcoFalke:
ACK e78aaf41f4 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)
Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
This combines reporting of buried (formally ISM) softfork deployments
and BIP9 versionbits softfork deployments into one JSON object in the
getblockchaininfo return object.
