We comment out a newly-added assert from the Bitcoin
side, because it's unclear how to replicate it
correctly in Elements.
Co-authored-by: Glenn Willen <gwillen@nerdnet.org>
When receiving unwanted headers from a peer, first check whether we have
recent "best known block" state for that peer. If not, accept one batch
of headers to refresh it. Otherwise, we can become stuck in a state where
we need blocks, but we don't know which peers have those blocks available.
This especially happens during startup, when we don't have this information
for any peers until we start processing header messages.
This fixes an issue which causes Elements to download the blockchain headers
multiple times during initial block download.
In particular: each time we receive an INV P2P message with a new block
(about once a minute), we start downloading the headers, again, in parallel
with any existing download(s) in progress.
With this change, after we receive each batch of headers, we check whether
any of the headers in it were new to us. If not (they were all duplicates),
we stop there, and do not ask the peer for another batch. This reduces the
maximum amount of duplication to about 2x, which is not ideal, but a HUGE
improvement.
021f86953e [style] Run changed files through clang formatter. (Amiti Uttarwar)
375750387e scripted-diff: Rename CAddrInfo to AddrInfo (Amiti Uttarwar)
dd8f7f2500 scripted-diff: Rename CAddrMan to AddrMan (Amiti Uttarwar)
3c263d3f63 [includes] Fix up included files (Amiti Uttarwar)
29727c2aa1 [doc] Update comments (Amiti Uttarwar)
14f9e000d0 [refactor] Update GetAddr_() function signature (Amiti Uttarwar)
40acd6fc9a [move-only] Move constants to test-only header (Amiti Uttarwar)
7cf41bbb38 [addrman] Change CAddrInfo access (Amiti Uttarwar)
e3f1ea659c [move-only] Move CAddrInfo to test-only header file (Amiti Uttarwar)
7cba9d5618 [net, addrman] Remove external dependencies on CAddrInfo objects (Amiti Uttarwar)
8af5b54f97 [addrman] Introduce CAddrMan::Impl to encapsulate addrman implementation. (Amiti Uttarwar)
f2e5f38f09 [move-only] Match ordering of CAddrMan declarations and definitions (Amiti Uttarwar)
5faa7dd6d8 [move-only] Move CAddrMan function definitions to cpp (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Introduce the pimpl pattern for AddrMan to separate the implementation details from the externally used object representation. This reduces compile-time dependencies and conceptually clarifies AddrMan's interface from the implementation specifics.
Since the unit & fuzz tests currently rely on accessing AddrMan internals, this PR introduces addrman_impl.h, which is exclusively imported by addrman.cpp and test files.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 021f86953e
GeneFerneau:
utACK [021f869](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22950/commits/021f86953e8a1dff8ecc768186368d345c865cc2)
mzumsande:
ACK 021f86953e
rajarshimaitra:
Concept + Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22950/commits/021f86953e8a1dff8ecc768186368d345c865cc2
theuni:
ACK 021f86953e
Tree-SHA512: aa70cb77927a35c85230163c0cf6d3872382d79048b0fb79341493caa46f8e91498cb787d8b06aba4da17b2f921f2230e73f3d66385519794fff86a831b3a71d
9d0379cea6 consensus: use <cstdint> over <stdint.h> in amount.h (fanquake)
863e52fe63 consensus: make COIN & MAX_MONEY constexpr (fanquake)
d09071da5b [MOVEONLY] consensus: move amount.h into consensus (fanquake)
Pull request description:
A first step (of a few) towards some source code reorganization, as well as making libbitcoinconsensus slightly more self contained.
Related to #15732.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
concept ACK 9d0379cea6 🏝
Tree-SHA512: 97fc79262dcb8c00996852a288fee69ddf8398ae2c95700bba5b326f1f38ffcfaf8fa66e29d0cb446d9b3f4e608a96525fae0c2ad9cd531ad98ad2a4a687cd6a
Improve readability of code, simplify future scripted diff cleanup PRs, and be
more consistent with naming for GetBoolArg.
This will also be useful for replacing runtime settings type checking
with compile time checking.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l GetArg | xargs sed -i 's/GetArg(\([^)]*\( [0-9]\+\|-1\|port\|BaseParams().RPCPort()\|Params().GetDefaultPort()\|_TIMEOUT\|Height\|_WORKQUEUE\|_THREADS\|_CONNECTIONS\|LIMIT\|SigOp\|Bytes\|_VERSION\|_AGE\|_CHECKS\|Checks() ? 1 : 0\|_BANTIME\|Cache\|BLOCKS\|LEVEL\|Weight\|Version\|BUFFER\|TARGET\|WEIGHT\|TXN\|TRANSACTIONS\|ADJUSTMENT\|i64\|Size\|nDefault\|_EXPIRY\|HEIGHT\|SIZE\|SNDHWM\|_TIME_MS\)\))/GetIntArg(\1)/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
The new name describes better what the bool does and also limits the confusion of the three different concepts:
* fBlocksOnly (This bool to skip tx invs)
* -blocksonly (A setting to ignore incoming txs)
* block-relay-only (A connection type in the block-relay-only P2P graph)
The us=... message in the debug log when sending a version message is
always [::]:0, because we no longer send our own address there.
Therefore, this information is entirely redundant. Remove it.
Historically, the VERSION message contains an "addrMe" and an "addrYou". As
these are sent before version negotiation is complete, the protocol version is
INIT_PROTO_VERSION (209), and in that protocol, CAddress is serialized without
nTime.
This is in fact the only situation left where a CAddress is (de)serialized
without nTime. As it's such a simple structure (CService for ip/port + uint64_t
for nServices), just inline that structure in the few places where it occurs,
and remove the logic for dealing with missing nTime from CAddress.
d930c7f5b0 p2p, rpc, test: address rate-limiting follow-ups (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Incorporates review feedback in #22387.
Edit, could be considered separately: should a release note (or two) be added for 22.0? e.g. the new getpeerinfo fields in `Updated RPCs` and the rate-limiting itself in `P2P and network changes`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d930c7f5b0
theStack:
re-ACK d930c7f5b0🌮
Zero-1729:
crACK d930c7f
Tree-SHA512: b2101cad87f59c238603f38bd8e8df7a4d48929794e4de9e0e0ff2afa935a68475c2d369aa669d124a0bec2f50280fb47e8b980bde6ad812db08cf67b71c066a
Currently, this call to SetupAddressRelay will never return false because of
the previous guard that returns early if the peer is not an inbound connection.
Rather than implicitly relying on this guarantee, throw an error in the debug
build if it ever changes.
5e33f762d4 p2p, rpc: address relay fixups (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Following review of new changes merged today, move a use of `statestats` in getpeerinfo to within the section guarded by `if (fStateStats)`, e.g. `PeerManagerImpl::GetNodeStateStats` true, and pass an in-param by reference to const.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 5e33f762d4
jnewbery:
ACK 5e33f762d4
Tree-SHA512: b42f33c615b14079e2c4e6060209de8707d71b351dd1e11e04a2a6fc12d15747d0c5d9b24850217080fd1ef92e63f96d6925c4badf280b781edd696c349be7d6
703b1e612a Close minor startup race between main and scheduler threads (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
This is a low-priority bug fix. The scheduler thread runs `CheckForStaleTipAndEvictPeers()` every 45 seconds (EXTRA_PEER_CHECK_INTERVAL). If its first run happens before the active chain is set up (`CChain::SetTip()`), `bitcoind` will assert:
```
(...)
2021-07-28T22:16:49Z init message: Loading block index…
bitcoind: validation.cpp:4968: CChainState& ChainstateManager::ActiveChainstate() const: Assertion `m_active_chainstate' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
```
I ran into this while using the debugger to investigate an unrelated problem. Single-stepping through threads with a debugger can cause the relative thread execution timing to be very different than usual. I don't think any automated tests are needed for this PR. I'll give reproduction steps in the next PR comment.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 703b1e612a
tryphe:
tested ACK 703b1e612a
0xB10C:
ACK 703b1e612a
glozow:
code review ACK 703b1e612a - it makes sense to me to start peerman's background tasks here, after `chainstate->LoadChainTip()` and `node.connman->Start()` have been called.
Tree-SHA512: 9316ad768cba3b171f62e2eb400e3790af66c47d1886d7965edb38d9710fc8c8f8e4fb38232811c9346732ce311d39f740c5c2aaf5f6ca390ddc48c51a8d633b
3f7250b328 [test] Use the new endpoint to improve tests (Amiti Uttarwar)
3893da06db [RPC] Add field to getpeerinfo to indicate if addr relay is enabled (Amiti Uttarwar)
0980ca78cd [test] Test that we intentionally select addr relay peers. (Amiti Uttarwar)
c061599e40 [net_processing] Remove RelayAddrsWithPeer function (Amiti Uttarwar)
201e496481 [net_processing] Introduce new field to indicate if addr relay is enabled (Amiti Uttarwar)
1d1ef2db7e [net_processing] Defer initializing m_addr_known (Amiti Uttarwar)
6653fa3328 [test] Update p2p_addr_relay test to prepare (Amiti Uttarwar)
2fcaec7bbb [net_processing] Introduce SetupAddressRelay (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on the test refactors extracted into #22306 (first 5 commits).
This PR aims to reduce addr blackholes. When we receive an `addr` message that contains 10 or less addresses, we forward them to 1-2 peers. This is the main technique we use for self advertisements, so sending to peers that wouldn't relay would effectively "blackhole" the trickle. Although we cannot prevent this in a malicious case, we can improve it for the normal, honest cases, and reduce the overall likelihood of occurrence. Two known cases where peers would not participate in addr relay are if they have connected to you as a block-relay-only connection, or if they are a light client.
This implementation defers initialization of `m_addr_known` until it is needed, then uses its presence to decide if the peer is participating in addr relay. For outbound (not block-relay-only) peers, we initialize the filter before sending the initial self announcement when processing their `version` message. For inbound peers, we initialize the filter if/when we get an addr related message (`ADDR`, `ADDRV2`, `GETADDR`). We do NOT initialize the filter based on a `SENDADDRV2` message.
To communicate about these changes beyond bitcoin core & to (try to) ensure that no other software would be disrupted, I have:
- Posted to the [mailing list](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-April/018784.html)
- Researched other open source clients to confirm compatibility, opened issues in all the projects & documented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21528#issuecomment-809906430. Many have confirmed that this change would not be problematic.
- Raised as topic during [bitcoin-core-dev meeting](https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-03-25.html#l-954)
- Raised as topic during [bitcoin p2p meeting](https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-04-20.html#l-439)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 3f7250b328
glozow:
ACK 3f7250b328
ajtowns:
utACK 3f7250b328
Tree-SHA512: 29069282af684c1cd37d107c395fdd432dcccb11626f3c2dabfe92fdc4c85e74c7c4056fbdfa88017fec240506639b72ac6c311f8ce7c583112eb15f47e421af
Don't schedule class PeerManagerImpl's background tasks from its
constructor, but instead do that from a separate method,
StartScheduledTasks(), that can be called later at the end of startup,
after other things, such as the active chain, are initialzed.
