c7376babd1 doc: Clarify distinction between util and common libraries in libraries.md (Ryan Ofsky)
4f74c59334 util: Move util/string.h functions to util namespace (Ryan Ofsky)
4d05d3f3b4 util: add TransactionError includes and namespace declarations (Ryan Ofsky)
680eafdc74 util: move fees.h and error.h to common/messages.h (Ryan Ofsky)
02e62c6c9a common: Add PSBTError enum (Ryan Ofsky)
0d44c44ae3 util: move error.h TransactionError enum to node/types.h (Ryan Ofsky)
9bcce2608d util: move spanparsing.h to script/parsing.h (Ryan Ofsky)
6dd2ad4792 util: move spanparsing.h Split functions to string.h (Ryan Ofsky)
23cc8ddff4 util: move HexStr and HexDigit from util to crypto (TheCharlatan)
6861f954f8 util: move util/message to common/signmessage (Ryan Ofsky)
cc5f29fbea build: move memory_cleanse from util to crypto (Ryan Ofsky)
5b9309420c build: move chainparamsbase from util to common (Ryan Ofsky)
ffa27af24d test: Add check-deps.sh script to check for unexpected library dependencies (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Remove `fees.h`, `errors.h`, and `spanparsing.h` from the util library. Specifically:
- Move `Split` functions from `util/spanparsing.h` to `util/string.h`, using `util` namespace for clarity.
- Move remaining spanparsing functions to `script/parsing.h` since they are used for descriptor and miniscript parsing.
- Combine `util/fees.h` and `util/errors.h` into `common/messages.h` so there is a place for simple functions that generate user messages to live, and these functions are not part of the util library.
Motivation for this change is that the util library is a dependency of the kernel, and we should remove functionality from util that shouldn't be called by kernel code or kernel applications. These changes should also improve code organization and make functions easier to discover. Some of these same moves are (or were) part of #28690, but did not help with code organization, or made it worse, so it is better to move them and clean them up in the same PR so code only has to change one time.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c7376babd1
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK c7376babd1
hebasto:
re-ACK c7376babd1.
Tree-SHA512: 5bcef16c1255463b1b69270548711e7ff78ca0dd34e300b95e3ca1ce52ceb34f83d9ddb2839e83800ba36b200de30396e504bbb04fa02c6d0c24a16d06ae523d
fa3169b073 rpc: Remove index-based Arg accessor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The index-based Arg accessor is redundant with the name-based one. It does not provide any benefit to the code reader, or otherwise, so remove it.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa3169b073, addressed doc nits
achow101:
ACK fa3169b073
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3169b073. One changes since last review are some documentation improvements
Tree-SHA512: f9da1c049dbf38c3b47a8caf8d24d195c2d4b88c7ec45a9ccfb78f1e39f29cb86869f84b308f6e49856b074c06604ab634c90eb89c9c93d2a8169e070aa1bd40
There are no changes to behavior. Changes in this commit are all additions, and
are easiest to review using "git diff -U0 --word-diff-regex=." options.
Motivation for this change is to keep util functions with really generic names
like "Split" and "Join" out of the global namespace so it is easier to see
where these functions are defined, and so they don't interfere with function
overloading, especially since the util library is a dependency of the kernel
library and intended to be used with external code.
cbc6c440e3 doc: add comments and release-notes for JSON-RPC 2.0 (Matthew Zipkin)
e7ee80dcf2 rpc: JSON-RPC 2.0 should not respond to "notifications" (Matthew Zipkin)
bf1a1f1662 rpc: Avoid returning HTTP errors for JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
466b90562f rpc: Add "jsonrpc" field and drop null "result"/"error" fields (Matthew Zipkin)
2ca1460ae3 rpc: identify JSON-RPC 2.0 requests (Matthew Zipkin)
a64a2b77e0 rpc: refactor single/batch requests (Matthew Zipkin)
df6e3756d6 rpc: Avoid copies in JSONRPCReplyObj() (Matthew Zipkin)
09416f9ec4 test: cover JSONRPC 2.0 requests, batches, and notifications (Matthew Zipkin)
4202c170da test: refactor interface_rpc.py (Matthew Zipkin)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/2960
Bitcoin Core's JSONRPC server behaves with a special blend of 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 behaviors. This introduces compliance issues with more strict clients. There are the major misbehaviors that I found:
- returning non-200 HTTP codes for RPC errors like "Method not found" (this is not a server error or an HTTP error)
- returning both `"error"` and `"result"` fields together in a response object.
- different error-handling behavior for single and batched RPC requests (batches contain errors in the response but single requests will actually throw HTTP errors)
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15495 added regression tests after a discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15381 to kinda lock in our RPC behavior to preserve backwards compatibility.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12435 was an attempt to allow strict 2.0 compliance behind a flag, but was abandoned.
The approach in this PR is not strict and preserves backwards compatibility in a familiar bitcoin-y way: all old behavior is preserved, but new rules are applied to clients that opt in. One of the rules in the [JSON RPC 2.0 spec](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#request_object) is that the kv pair `"jsonrpc": "2.0"` must be present in the request. Well, let's just use that to trigger strict 2.0 behavior! When that kv pair is included in a request object, the [response will adhere to strict JSON-RPC 2.0 rules](https://www.jsonrpc.org/specification#response_object), essentially:
- always return HTTP 200 "OK" unless there really is a server error or malformed request
- either return `"error"` OR `"result"` but never both
- same behavior for single and batch requests
If this is merged next steps can be:
- Refactor bitcoin-cli to always use strict 2.0
- Refactor the python test framework to always use strict 2.0 for everything
- Begin deprecation process for 1.0/1.1 behavior (?)
If we can one day remove the old 1.0/1.1 behavior we can clean up the rpc code quite a bit.
ACKs for top commit:
cbergqvist:
re ACK cbc6c440e3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cbc6c440e3. Just suggested changes since the last review: changing uncaught exception error code from PARSE_ERROR to MISC_ERROR, renaming a few things, and adding comments.
tdb3:
re ACK for cbc6c440e3
Tree-SHA512: 0b702ed32368b34b29ad570d090951a7aeb56e3b0f2baf745bd32fdc58ef68fee6b0b8fad901f1ca42573ed714b150303829cddad4a34ca7ad847350feeedb36
30a6c99935 rpc: access some args by name (stickies-v)
bbb31269bf rpc: add named arg helper (stickies-v)
13525e0c24 rpc: add arg helper unit test (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Adds string overloads for the `RPCHelpMan::Arg` and `RPCHelpMan::MaybeArg` helpers to be able to access RPC arguments by name instead of index number. Especially in RPCs with a large number of parameters, this can be quite helpful.
Example usage:
```cpp
const auto action{self.Arg<std::string>("action")};
```
Most of the LoC is adding test coverage and documentation updates. No behaviour change.
An alternative approach to #27788 with significantly less overhaul.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 30a6c99935
maflcko:
ACK 30a6c99935🥑
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 30a6c99935. Nice change! Implementation is surprisingly simple and additional unit test coverage is welcome, too.
Tree-SHA512: 4904f5f914fe1d421d32f60edb7c5a028c8ea0f140a2f207a106b4752d441164e073066a6bf2e17693f859fe847815a96609d3cf521e0ac4178d8cd09362ea3d
2cd28e9fef rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
Also add flag to allow RPC methods that intendionally accept options and
parameters with the same name bypass the check.
Check and flag were suggested by ajtowns
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26485#issuecomment-1507916357
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type works the same as OBJ type except it registers the object
keys to be accepted as top-level named-only RPC parameters. Generated
documentation also lists the object keys seperately in a new "Named arguments"
section of help text.
Named-only RPC parameters have the same semantics as python keyword-only
arguments (https://peps.python.org/pep-3102/). They are always required to be
passed by name, so they don't affect interpretation of positional arguments,
and aren't affected when positional arguments are added or removed.
The new OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type is used in the next commit to make it easier to
pass options values to various RPC methods.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <github@achow101.com>
Preparation to deprecate ParseNonRFCJSONValue() but keep test coverage
on the underlying UniValue::read() unaffected. The test coverage on
AmountFromValue is no longer included, since that is already tested
in the rpc_parse_monetary_values test case.
Fuzzing coverage on ParseNonRFCJSONValue() was duplicated between string.cpp
and parse_univalue.cpp, only the one in parse_univalue.cpp is kept.
Specifying same named parameter multiple times is still allowed by bitcoin-cli.
The client implementation overwrites earlier option values with later ones
before sending to server. This is tested by interface_bitcoin_cli.py
Rationale for allowing client parameters to be specified multiple times in
bitcoin-cli is that this behavior has been supported for a long time, and that
when using the command line interactively, it can be convenient to override
earlier option values with new values without having to go back and remove the
old value.
But for the RPC server, there isn't really a good use-case for earlier values
to be discarded if multiple values are specified. JSON keys are generally
supposed to be unique and if they aren't it's probably an indication of some
problem generating the RPC request.
Current behavior isn't ideal and will be changed in upcoming commits, but it's
useful to have test coverage regardless.
MarcoFalke reported the case of bitcoin-cli positional arguments overwriting
the named "args" parameter in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19762#discussion_r1035761471
It's nice to be able to use named options and positional arguments together.
Most shell tools accept both, and python functions combine options and
arguments allowing them to be passed with even more flexibility. This change
adds support for python's approach so as a motivating example:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet wallet_name=mywallet load_on_startup=1
Can be shortened to:
bitcoin-cli -named createwallet mywallet load_on_startup=1
JSON-RPC standard doesn't have a convention for passing named and positional
parameters together, so this implementation makes one up and interprets any
unused "args" named parameter as a positional parameter array.
