Had to change some hashes in descriptor_tests, presumably because of the
differences between when Elements and Bitcoin when it comes to Taproot.
Please review this carefully and investigate the FIXME
9b52672700 For descriptor pubkey parse errors, include context information (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This adds readily-available context information to the error string, for further disambiguation.
This is a revival of #16123 which was largely addressed in #16542.
Note 'Multi:' is used rather than 'multi():' as it also encompasses 'sortedmulti():'
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9b52672700
theStack:
ACK 9b52672700
Tree-SHA512: 96533ea8c3ac7010f9b62e75b4bd20b65aff843030eb91c7a88312975acecaaf17909b7d1841f45edc86dbf7fa402d208adb85f0673bd79b857dbebacb8c9395
fae20e6b50 Revert "Avoid the use of P0083R3 std::set::merge" (MarcoFalke)
fab53b5fd4 ci/doc: Set minimum required clang/libc++ version to 8.0 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is not for 23.0, but for 24.0. It comes with the following benefits:
* Can use C++17 P0083R3 std::set::merge from libc++ 8.0
* No longer need to provide support for clang-7, which already fails to compile on some architectures (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21294#issuecomment-998098483)
This should be fine, given that all supported operating systems ship with at least clang-10:
* CentOS 8: clang-12
* Stretch: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/clang-11
* Buster: https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/clang-11
* Bionic: https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic-updates/clang-10
* Focal: https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/clang-10
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fae20e6b50 - I think this is fine to do. I would be surprised if in another 6 months time someone was stuck on a system we supported, needing to compile Core, and only had access to Clang 7 or older. As mentioned in the PR description, all systems we currently support, already support multiple newer versions of Clang.
hebasto:
ACK fae20e6b50, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 3b4c6c130ff40dd7e84934af076863415e5dd661d823c72e3e3832566c65be6e877a7ef9164bbcf394bcea4b897fc29a48db0f231c22ace0e2c9b5638659a628
4828d53ecc Add (sorted)multi_a descriptors to doc/descriptors.md (Pieter Wuille)
b5f33ac1f8 Simplify wallet_taproot.py functional test (Pieter Wuille)
eb0667ea96 Add tests for (sorted)multi_a derivation/signing (Pieter Wuille)
c17c6aa08d Add signing support for (sorted)multi_a scripts (Pieter Wuille)
3eed6fca57 Add multi_a descriptor inference (Pieter Wuille)
79728c4a3d Add (sorted)multi_a descriptor and script derivation (Pieter Wuille)
25e95f9ff8 Merge/generalize IsValidMultisigKeyCount/GetMultisigKeyCount (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a new `multi_a(k,key_1,key_2,...,key_n)` (and corresponding `sortedmulti_a`) descriptor for k-of-n policies inside `tr()`. Semantically it is very similar to the existing `multi()` descriptor, but with the following changes:
* The corresponding script is `<key1> OP_CHECKSIG <key2> OP_CHECKSIGADD <key3> OP_CHECKSIGADD ... <key_n> OP_CHECKSIGADD <k> OP_NUMEQUAL`, rather than the traditional `OP_CHECKMULTISIG`-based script, making it usable inside the `tr()` descriptor.
* The keys can optionally be specified in x-only notation.
* Both the number of keys and the threshold can be as high as 999; this is the limit due to the consensus stacksize=1000 limit
I expect that this functionality will later be replaced with a miniscript-based implementation, but I don't think it's necessary to wait for that.
Limitations:
* The wallet code will for not estimate witness size incorrectly for script path spends, which may result in a (dramatic) fee underpayment with large multi_a scripts.
* The multi_a script construction is (slightly) suboptimal for n-of-n (where a `<key1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY ... <key_n-1> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY <key_n> OP_CHECKSIG` would be better). Such a construction is not included here.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4828d53ecc
gruve-p:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24043/commits/4828d53eccd52a67631c64cef0ba7df90dff138d
sanket1729:
code review ACK 4828d53ecc
darosior:
Code review ACK 4828d53ecc
Tree-SHA512: 5dcd434b79585f0ff830f7d501d27df5e346f5749f47a3109ec309ebf2cbbad0e1da541eec654026d911ab67fd7cf7793fab0f765628d68d81b96ef2a4d234ce
fa5d2e678c Remove unused char serialize (MarcoFalke)
fa24493d63 Use spans of std::byte in serialize (MarcoFalke)
fa65bbf217 span: Add BytePtr helper (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes the serialize code (`.read()` and `.write()` functions) to take a `Span` instead of a pointer and size. This is a breaking change for the serialize interface, so at no additional cost we can also switch to `std::byte` (instead of using `char`).
The benefits of using `Span`:
* Less verbose and less fragile code when passing an already existing `Span`(-like) object to or from serialization
The benefits of using `std::byte`:
* `std::byte` can't accidentally be mistaken for an integer
The goal here is to only change serialize to use spans of `std::byte`. If needed, `AsBytes`, `MakeUCharSpan`, ... can be used (temporarily) to pass spans of the right type.
Other changes that are included here:
* [#22167](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22167) (refactor: Remove char serialize by MarcoFalke)
* [#21906](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21906) (Preserve const in cast on CTransactionSignatureSerializer by promag)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK fa5d2e678c
sipa:
re-utACK fa5d2e678c
Tree-SHA512: 08ee9eced5fb777cedae593b11e33660bed9a3e1711a7451a87b835089a96c99ce0632918bb4666a4e859c4d020f88fb50f2dd734216b0c3d1a9a704967ece6f
SerializeToVector, UnserializeFromVector, DeserializeHDKeypaths, and SerializeHDKeypaths
were in sign.h where PSBT was originally implemented. Since all of the PSBT serialization
has moved to its own file, these functions should follow.
