It's a feerate, not a fee. Also follow the style guide for member names.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: f9cd2bfbcc
(cherry picked from commit d61fb07da7)
Instead of fetching the discard feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, fetch and cache it once during CreateTransaction so that it
is shared for each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_discard_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: bdd0c2934b
(cherry picked from commit 5fc381e443)
Instead of setting the long term feerate for each SelectCoinsMinConf
iteration, set it once during CreateTransaction and let it be shared
with each SelectCoinsMinConf through
coin_selection_params.m_long_term_feerate.
Does not change behavior.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: 448d04b931
(cherry picked from commit bcd716670b)
Make sure that all fee calculations use the same feerate.
coin_selection_params.effective_fee is the variable we use for all fee
calculations, so get rid of remaining nFeeRateNeeded usages and just
directly set coin_selection_params.effective_fee.
Does not change behavior.
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: e2f429e6bb
(cherry picked from commit 34c89f92f3)
During each loop of CreateTransaction, instead of constantly getting a
new feerate, use the feerate that we have already fetched for all
fee calculations. Thix fixes a race condition where the feerate required
changes during each iteration of the loop.
This commit changes behavior as the "Fee estimation failed" error will
now take priority over "Signing transaction failed".
Github-Pull: #21083
Rebased-From: 1a6a0b0dfb
(cherry picked from commit 48fc675163)
1204b91c2d re-enable fallbackfee by default (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
Upstream disabled the default `fallbackfee` option in 0.17, which caused us some user error reports in 0.18. Re-enable the option in 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
stevenroose:
utACK 1204b91c2d
Tree-SHA512: 62d053405c00f5ca31ae3fb24ab8def2c9e3bd52909dfac57e65224947295a56f0b8a322ffeb0dfcdcb3103fcaf310a9554f3ed3a8490859ca82aaeae26c7fb2
How to review this PR:
* Skim the description of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/20347
to see that it's roughly "when pick_new_inputs is unset but bnb_used is
set, one the next iteration of the loop an assumption may be wrong"
* See that in this case, we just add another iteration to the loop...
* ...in exactly the same way as the other place that pick_new_inputs is
turned off, I just missed this one before
* Observe that the regression test fails before the patch but passes after.
Reset back to Bitcoin PSBT and disable PSBT/PSET handling in wallet and
rpc.
This is just a reset to allow for PSBTv2 change and then a new and
improved PSET.
