Moved GetOnlinePakKey to the scriptpubkey manager; the other blinding
stuff remains in the CWallet. At some point after the rebase we should
consider whether there's a better separation to be had between the PAK
related stuff now that we have wallet boxes.
This adds a new `SigVersion::TAPSCRIPT`, makes the necessary interpreter
changes to make it implement BIP342, and uses them for leaf version 0xc0
in Taproot script path spends.
This includes key path spending and script path spending, but not the
Tapscript execution implementation (leaf 0xc0 remains unemcumbered in
this commit).
Includes constants for various aspects of the consensus rules suggested
by Jeremy Rubin.
This enables the schnorrsig module in libsecp256k1, adds the relevant types
and functions to src/pubkey, as well as in higher-level `SignatureChecker`
classes. The (verification side of the) BIP340 test vectors is also added.
This implements the new sighashing scheme from BIP341, with all relevant
whole-transaction values precomputed once and cached.
Includes changes to PrecomputedTransactionData by Pieter Wuille.
A BIP-341 signature message may commit to the scriptPubKeys and amounts
of all spent outputs (including other ones than the input being signed
for spends), so keep them available to signature hashing code.
In preparation for adding Schnorr versions of `CheckSig`, `VerifySignature`, and
`ComputeEntry`, give them an ECDSA specific name.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/CheckSig(/CheckECDSASignature(/g' $(git grep -l CheckSig ./src)
sed -i 's/VerifySignature(/VerifyECDSASignature(/g' $(git grep -l VerifySignature ./src)
sed -i 's/ComputeEntry(/ComputeEntryECDSA(/g' $(git grep -l ComputeEntry ./src)
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
f63dec189c [REFACTOR] Initialize PrecomputedTransactionData in CheckInputScripts (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is a single commit taken from the Schnorr/Taproot PR #17977.
Add a default constructor to `PrecomputedTransactionData`, which doesn't initialize the struct's members. Instead they're initialized inside the `CheckInputScripts()` function. This allows a later commit to add the spent UTXOs to that structure. The spent UTXOs are required for the schnorr signature hash, since it commits to the scriptPubKeys. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#common-signature-message for details.
By itself, this isn't really an improvement to the code, but I think it makes sense to separate out the refactor/moveonly commits from PR #17977 so that PR is only the logical changes needed for Schnorr/Taproot.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK f63dec1 `git diff 851908d f63dec1` shows no change since last ACK.
sipa:
utACK f63dec189c
theStack:
re-ACK f63dec189c
fjahr:
Re-ACK f63dec189c
ariard:
Code Review ACK f63dec1
Tree-SHA512: ecf9154077824ae4c274b4341e985797f3648c0cb0c31cb25ce382163b923a3acbc7048683720be4ae3663501801129cd0f48c441a36f049cc304ebe9f30994e
Add a default constructor to `PrecomputedTransactionData`, which doesn't
initialize the struct's members. Instead they're initialized inside the
`CheckInputScripts()` function. This allows a later commit to add the
spent UTXOs to that structure.
14e8cf974a [consensus] MOVEONLY: Move single-sig checking EvalScript code to EvalChecksig (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is another small refactor pulled out of the Schnorr/Taproot PR #17977.
This is in preparation for adding different signature verification rules,
specifically tapscript (BIP 342), which interprets opcode 0xac and 0xad
as Schnorr signature verifications.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 14e8cf974a, verified move-only.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 14e8cf974a, reviewed with "git show 14e8cf974a --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space -W" 👆
fjahr:
Code-review ACK 14e8cf974a, verified that it's move-only.
instagibbs:
code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18422/commits/14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, verified move-only
theStack:
Code-Review ACK 14e8cf974a
jonatack:
ACK 14e8cf974a
Tree-SHA512: af2efce9ae39d5ec01db5b9ef0ff383fe252ef5f33b3483927308ae17d91a619266cb45951f32ea1ce54807a4c0f052bcdefb47e244465d3a726393221c227b1
This is in preparation for adding different signature verification rules,
specifically tapscript (BIP 342), which interprets opcode 0xac and 0xad
as Schnorr signature verifications.
e6e622e5a0 Implement O(1) OP_IF/NOTIF/ELSE/ENDIF logic (Pieter Wuille)
d0e8f4d5d8 [refactor] interpreter: define interface for vfExec (Anthony Towns)
89fb241c54 Benchmark script verification with 100 nested IFs (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
While investigating what mechanisms are possible to maximize the per-opcode verification cost of scripts, I noticed that the logic for determining whether a particular opcode is to be executed is O(n) in the nesting depth. This issue was also pointed out by Sergio Demian Lerner in https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2017/04/17/new-quadratic-delays-in-bitcoin-scripts/, and this PR implements a variant of the O(1) algorithm suggested there.
This is not a problem currently, because even with a nesting depth of 100 (the maximum possible right now due to the 201 ops limit), the slowdown caused by this on my machine is around 70 ns per opcode (or 0.25 s per block) at worst, far lower than what is possible with other opcodes.
This PR mostly serves as a proof of concept that it's possible to avoid it, which may be relevant in discussions around increasing the opcode limits in future script versions. Without it, the execution time of scripts can grow quadratically with the nesting depth, which very quickly becomes unreasonable.
This improves upon #14245 by completely removing the `vfExec` vector.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK e6e622e5a0
MarcoFalke:
ACK e6e622e5a0🐴
fjahr:
ACK e6e622e5a0
ajtowns:
ACK e6e622e5a0
laanwj:
concept and code review ACK e6e622e5a0
jonatack:
ACK e6e622e5a0 code review, build, benches, fuzzing
Tree-SHA512: 1dcfac3411ff04773de461959298a177f951cb5f706caa2734073bcec62224d7cd103767cfeef85cd129813e70c14c74fa8f1e38e4da70ec38a0f615aab1f7f7
0c62e3aa73 New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
This commit adds comments referencing multiple CVEs both in production and test code.
CVEs covered in this commit:
CVE-2010-5137
CVE-2010-5139
CVE-2010-5141
CVE-2012-1909
CVE-2012-2459
CVE-2012-3789
CVE-2018-17144
592a622b4 Add detection of liquidv1 fedpeg script, startup sanity check (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
And use it to sanity check startup constants.
Tree-SHA512: 1e4c3910c5c269384b5dab7a3f38646356a8de7684515324320d610915466e5015e9993d7a2a619473ea3500f3f9145526414548d6da6ee22b4417b6836042bf
