For all spelling lints, either fix them in place, or add them to the
ignore list.
I don't understand how these have gotten in here without ever
triggering the linter until now. I'm not sure if it's something about
my test environment or what. But fixing them can't hurt.
Conflicts were mostly obvious, except for those in CreateTransactionInternal.
(This function was moved from wallet.cpp to spend.cpp, and substantially
rewritten, between 0.21 and 22.0.) For those I manually applied the changes
from the diff, which wound up taking a slightly different form.
Also had to update the new test because the `addresses` field of the RPC
output was removed.
928af61cdb allow send rpc take external inputs and solving data (Andrew Chow)
e39b5a5e7a Tests for funding with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
38f5642ccc allow fundtx rpcs to work with external inputs (Andrew Chow)
d5cfb864ae Allow Coin Selection be able to take external inputs (Andrew Chow)
a00eb388e8 Allow CInputCoin to also be constructed with COutPoint and CTxOut (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently `fundrawtransaction` and `walletcreatefundedpsbt` both do not allow external inputs as the wallet does not have the information necessary to estimate their fees.
This PR adds an additional argument to both those RPCs which allows the user to specify solving data. This way, the wallet can use that solving data to estimate the size of those inputs. The solving data can be public keys, scripts, or descriptors.
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
reACK 928af61cdb
meshcollider:
Re-utACK 928af61cdb
instagibbs:
crACK 928af61cdb
yanmaani:
utACK 928af61.
Tree-SHA512: bc7a6ef8961a7f4971ea5985d75e2d6dc50c2a90b44c664a1c4b0f1be5c1c97823516358fdaab35771a4701dbefc0862127b1d0d4bfd02b4f20d2befa4434700
43cd6b8af9 doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6c refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b8 refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9 per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
d96b000e94 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe69 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dc Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94
lsilva01:
Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23065/commits/d96b000e94d72d041689c5c47e374df2ebc0e011 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23065/commits/d96b000e94d72d041689c5c47e374df2ebc0e011
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
fc8bfc1f2c claimpegin: add regression test for behavior when fallbackfee is disabled (Andrew Poelstra)
fd520079a1 claimpegin: sanity-check fee in case fallbackfee is disabled, throw explicit exception (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
Produce a much less confusing error message in `claimpegin` in the case that estimatesmartfee fails and no fallbackfee is set.
ACKs for top commit:
stevenroose:
ACK fc8bfc1f2c
Tree-SHA512: 2ae658ab3dc90b7319d047c192401a0dcc97e015e45b5b0db71db1d89d63605ba107312d8b4cf1c4aaef72437aa20aa33b442744f64fc08535b15610e6f4a526
Instead of discarding a PSET when the UTXOs are missing and the blinding
step fails in walletprocesspsbt, just ignore a missing UTXOs error and
don't blind.
Core's fee logic has a special case where it will give a zero fee estimate
if fallbackfee is disabled and it has no good data from estimatesmartfee.
If it gets a nonzero value below the min relay fee, it'll instead use the
min relay fee ... but zero is special. I think this is a bug. Regardless,
it was causing confusing error messages in `claimpegin`, especially as
the fallbackfee is no longer set by default as of 0.21
Surprisingly easy to do. Almost all of the diff resolution was mechanically
* replacing boost::variant with std::variant
* replacing Optional with std::optional
* then replacing `nullopt` with `std::nullopt`
* updating the RPC functions for the new RPCArg::Default type
* update the tests/ directory to make new (since 22) tests use arrays for
createrawtransaction outputs
* other ad-hoc changes to function parameters etc (not too many of these)
I had to "really" change the code in PrecomputePSBTData, which was introduced
in 22.0 and affected by PSET, but this function was like 8 lines long so it
was easy.
Reviewing the diff may be a bit difficult because of the mix of mechanical
changes and ad-hoc things. Probably the most straightforward thing to do
is to redo the merge, `sed -i` to fix the boost::variant and Optional stuff,
then diff the remaining conflicts against this commit.
TODO: grep for `blindpsbt` and you will see that this RPC is still referenced
in documentation and help text even though it was deleted. Need to fix this
in 0.21 in a separate PR.
