The new helper function, BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB(),
has a thread safety lock annotation in its declaration but is
missing the corresponding run-time lock assertion in its definition.
Per doc/developer-notes.md: "Combine annotations in function
declarations with run-time asserts in function definitions."
fa68a6c2fc scripted-diff: Rename touched member variables (MarcoFalke)
facd3df21f Make blockstorage globals private members of BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
faa8c2d7d7 doc: Clarify nPruneAfterHeight for signet (MarcoFalke)
fad381b2f8 test: Load genesis block to allow flush (MarcoFalke)
fab262174b Move blockstorage-related unload to BlockManager::Unload (MarcoFalke)
fa467f3913 move-only: Create WriteBlockIndexDB helper (MarcoFalke)
fa88cfd3f9 Move functions to BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Globals aren't too nice because they hide dependencies, also they make testing harder.
Fix that by removing some.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK fa68a6c2fc
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa68a6c2fc. Nice changes!
Tree-SHA512: 6abc5929a5e43a05e238276721d46a64a44f23dca18c2caa9775437a32351d6815d88b88757254686421531d0df13861bbd3a202e13a3192798d87a96abef65d
e3544c864e init: Use clang-tidy named args syntax (Carl Dong)
3401630417 style-only: Rename *Chainstate return values (Carl Dong)
1dd582782d docs: Make LoadChainstate comment more accurate (Carl Dong)
6b83576388 node/chainstate: Use MAX_FUTURE_BLOCK_TIME (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
There are 2 proposed fixups in discussions in #23280 which I have not implemented:
1. An overhaul to return types and an option type for the two `*Chainstate` functions: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23280#issuecomment-984149564
- The change reintroduces stringy return types and is quite involved. It could be discussed in a separate PR.
2. Passing in the unix time to `VerifyChainstate` instead of a callback to get the time: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23280#discussion_r765051533
- I'm not sure it matters much whether it's a callback or just the actual unix time. Also, I think `VerifyDB` can take quite a while, and I don't want to impose that the function have to "run quickly" in order to have it be correct.
If reviewers feel strongly about either of the two fixups listed above, please feel free to open a PR based on mine and I'll close this one!
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e3544c864e
MarcoFalke:
ACK e3544c864e🐸
Tree-SHA512: dd1de0265b6785eef306e724b678ce03d7c54ea9f4b5ea0ccd7af59cce2ea3aba73fd4af0c15e2dca9265807dc4075f9afa2ec103672677b6638b1a4fc090904
