This PR adds a new functional test which unfortunately we need to disable
because it triggers an unrelated Elements bug (assertation failure when
attempting a large fundrawtransaction).
See https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/issues/880
There are a few layers of bullshit to this PR.
First, there is the fact that it adds a functional test gated on a new
config flag which is disabled by default, so it actually adds broken
code with no tests, waiting to ruin your day 520 PRs later when #21935
enables the broken test.
Second, the test appears to be superficially nonsensical because it
generates two transactions from different wallets and tries to compare
them for byte-for-byte equality, which doesn't make sense (at least)
because change outputs are randomly located...so something fishy is
going on.
Of course, in Elements the transactions are *not* equal half the time
because the outputs are permuted, which may have let me quickly figure
out the issue, except...
Third, there is a red herring of a bug where the two transactions have
slightly different feerates. This turns out to be caused by
CWallet::CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize using differently sized dummy
transactions depending on whether watchonly outputs are included (this
fact is conveniently disguised by #17211 slightly changing this logic;
this is an unmerged PR in Core that Elements has a backport of an old
version of). And the two wallets have different watchonly settings.
A sub-red-herring is the fact that this bug results in a discrepancy
of 0.25 vbytes, so it does not appear in Core but does appear in
Elements (there is a 3/16 probability that we should be so unlucky...
we are).
But this is all irrelevant, because...
Fourth, this test is actually super bullshit. The way it works is by
constructing a PSBT legitimately, saving this to disk, then re-"signs"
using the external signer interface by using a mock signer that
COMPLETELY REPLACES THE TRANSACTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION. So it doesn't
matter what the fee output looks like and it doesn't matter what the
order of the outputs. Core does not detect this malfeasance and
neither does Elements. For some reason, Core has a functional test
that explicitly checks that you can do this even though it is insane
and it is hard to think of non-malicious reasons to do it.
Fifth, while Elements fails to detect that its external signer is
actually changing the transaction out from under it, it DOES assume
that this won't happen. In CWallet::SignPSBT it blithely un-replaces
the transaction, which undermines the functional test.
Sixth, the original PR where this test was introduced has comments
locked, so anyone who spent six hours reverse-engineering this idiotic
broken test, and is still feeling charitable enough to discuss it with
the Core developors, can go pound sand.
Anyway, just disabled the broken test and move on with our lives.
Adds an error output parameter to all GetReservedDestination functions
so that callers can get the actual reason that a change address could
not be fetched. This more closely matches GetNewDestination. This allows
for more granular error messages, such as one that indicates that
bech32m addresses cannot be generated yet.
If a transaction as a segwit output, use a bech32m change address if
they are available. If not, fallback to bech32. If bech32 change
addresses are unavailable, fallback to the default address type.
Bech32m addresses need their own OutputType
We are not ready to create DescriptorScriptPubKeyMans which produce
bech32m addresses. So don't allow generating them.
This is a really non-trivial wallet refactor "effective value" which has been
in the Core queue for a pretty long time. There were a ton of merge conflicts
but they were mostly mechanical (all the benchmarks) or "take the Core side
of the diff" (most of wallet.cpp).
The two nontrivial things were:
* In `SelectCoinsMinConf` in wallet.cpp I had to slightly move the asset
filtering logic (but I didn't change it)
* In `OutputGroup::Insert' in coinselection.cpp I changed the effective
value computation to only consider policyAsset values
458a345b05 Add support for SIGHASH_DEFAULT in RPCs, and make it default (Pieter Wuille)
c0f0c8eccb tests: check spending of P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
a2380127e9 Basic Taproot signing logic in script/sign.cpp (Pieter Wuille)
49487bc3b6 Make GetInputUTXO safer: verify non-witness UTXO match (Pieter Wuille)
fd3f6890f3 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in PSBT signing (Pieter Wuille)
5cb6502ac5 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in SignTransaction (Pieter Wuille)
5d2e22437b Don't nuke witness data when signing fails (Pieter Wuille)
ce9353164b Permit full precomputation in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
e841fb503d Add precomputed txdata support to MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (Pieter Wuille)
a91d532338 Add CKey::SignSchnorr function for BIP 340/341 signing (Pieter Wuille)
e77a2839b5 Use HandleMissingData also in CheckSchnorrSignature (Pieter Wuille)
dbb0ce9fbf Add TaprootSpendData data structure, equivalent to script map for P2[W]SH (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Builds on top of #22051, adding signing support after derivation support.
Nothing is changed in descriptor features. Signing works for key path and script path spending, through the normal sending functions, and PSBT-based RPCs. However, PSBT usability is rather low as no extensions have been defined to convey Taproot-specific information, so all script information must be known to the signing wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 458a345b05
fjahr:
Code review ACK 458a345b05
Sjors:
ACK 458a345b05
Tree-SHA512: 30ed212cf7754763a4a81624ebc084c51727b8322711ac0b390369213c1a891d367ed8b123882ac08c99595320c11ec57ee42304ff22a69afdc3d1a0d55cc711
Reset back to Bitcoin PSBT and disable PSBT/PSET handling in wallet and
rpc.
This is just a reset to allow for PSBTv2 change and then a new and
improved PSET.
f5ba424cd4 wallet: Add IsAddressUsed / SetAddressUsed methods (Russell Yanofsky)
62252c95e5 interfaces: Stop exposing wallet destdata to gui (Russell Yanofsky)
985430d9b2 test: Add gui test for wallet receive requests (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Stop giving GUI access to destdata rows in database. Replace with narrow API just for saving and reading receive request information.
This simplifies code and should prevent the GUI from interfering with other destdata like address-used status. It also adds some more GUI test coverage.
There are no changes in behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
tACK f5ba424cd4
laanwj:
Code review ACK f5ba424cd4
Tree-SHA512: 5423df4786e537a59013cb5bfb9e1bc29a7ca4b8835360c00cc2165a59f925fdc355907a4ceb8bca0285bb4946ba235bffa7645537a951ad03fd3b4cee17b6b0
c7bd5842e4 MOVEONLY: CWallet transaction code out of wallet.cpp/.h (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This commit just moves function without making any changes. It can be reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make `wallet.cpp/h` less monolithic and start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions out of `wallet.cpp/.h` into better organized files:
- `transaction.cpp/.h` - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- `receive.cpp/.h` - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- `spend.cpp/.h` - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be possible to move more `wallet.cpp/.h` functions to:
- `sync.cpp/.h` - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges `receive.cpp` and `spend.cpp` functions in dependency order so it's possible to skim `receive.cpp` and get an idea of how computing balances works, and skim `spend.cpp` and get an idea of how transactions are created, without having to jump all over `wallet.cpp` where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged earlier.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK c7bd5842e4
fjahr:
utACK c7bd5842e4
promag:
Code review ACK c7bd5842e4, verified move only claim.
meshcollider:
Dimmed-zebra-check and functional test run ACK c7bd5842e4
Tree-SHA512: 4981de6911cb1196774db375494355cc9af59b52456129c002d264a77cd9ed6175f8ecbb6b2f492a59a4d5a0def21a39d96fa79c9f4d99be0992985f553be32f
e6fe1c37d0 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b1 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
glozow:
code review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18418/commits/e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
This commit just moves functions without making any changes. It can be
reviewed with `git log -p -n1 --color-moved=dimmed_zebra`
Motivation for this change is to make wallet.cpp/h less monolithic and
start to make wallet transaction state tracking comprehensible so bugs
in
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking
can be fixed safely without introducing new problems.
This commit moves wallet classes and methods that deal with transactions
out of wallet.cpp/.h into better organized files:
- transaction.cpp/.h - CWalletTx and CMerkleTx class definitions
- receive.cpp/.h - functions checking received transactions and computing balances
- spend.cpp/.h - functions creating transactions and finding spendable coins
After #20773, when loading is separated from syncing it will also be
possible to move more wallet.cpp/.h functions to:
- sync.cpp/.h - functions handling chain notifications and rescanning
This commit arranges receive.cpp and spend.cpp functions in dependency
order so it's possible to skim receive.cpp and get an idea of how
computing balances works, and skim spend.cpp and get an idea of how
transactions are created, without having to jump all over wallet.cpp
where functions are not in order and there is a lot of unrelated code.
Followup commit "refactor: Detach wallet transaction methods" in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21206 follows up this PR and
tweaks function names and arguments to reflect new locations. The two
commits are split into separate PRs because this commit is more work to
maintain and less work to review, while the other commit is less work to
maintain and more work to review, so hopefully this commit can be merged
earlier.
51a3ac242c Have OutputGroup determine the value to use (Andrew Chow)
6d6d278475 Change SelectCoins_test to actually test SelectCoins (Andrew Chow)
9d3bd74ab4 Remove CreateTransaction while loop and some related variables (Andrew Chow)
6f0d5189af Remove use_bnb and bnb_used (Andrew Chow)
de26eb0e1f Do both BnB and Knapsack coin selection in SelectCoinsMinConf (Andrew Chow)
01dc8ebda5 Have KnapsackSolver actually use effective values (Andrew Chow)
bf26e018de Roll static tx fees into nValueToSelect instead of having it be separate (Andrew Chow)
cc3f14b27c Move output reductions for fee to after coin selection (Andrew Chow)
d97d25d950 Make cost_of_change part of CoinSelectionParams (Andrew Chow)
af5867c896 Move some calculations to common code in SelectCoinsMinConf (Andrew Chow)
1bf4a62cb6 scripted-diff: rename some variables (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Changes `KnapsackSolver` to use effective values instead of just the nominal txout value. Since fees are taken into account during the selection itself, we finally get rid of the `CreateTransaction` loop as well as a few other things that only were only necessary because of that loop.
This should not change coin selection behavior at all (except maybe remove weird edge cases that were caused by the loop). In order to keep behavior the same, `KnapsackSolver` will select outputs with a negative effective value (as it did before).
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 51a3ac242c. Looks good to go!
instagibbs:
review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17331/commits/51a3ac242c92e69b59df26f8f9e287b31e5c3b0f
meshcollider:
re-light-utACK 51a3ac242c
Tree-SHA512: 372c27e00edcd5dbf85177421ba88f20bfdaf1791b6e3dc022c44876ecc379403e2375ed69e71c512c49e6af87641001ff385c4b25ab93684b3a08a53bf3824e
Instead of hijacking the effective_feerate to use the correct value
during coin selection, have OutputGroup be aware of whether we are
subtracting the fee from the outputs and provide the correct value to
use for selection.
To do this, OutputGroup now takes CoinSelectionParams and has a new
function GetSelectionAmount().
Remove the CreateTransaction while loop. Removes variables that were
only needed because of that loop. Also renames a few variables and
moves their declarations to where they are used.
Some subtractFeeFromOutputs handling is moved to after coin selection
in order to reduce their amounts once the fee is known.
If subtracting the fee reduces the change to dust, we will also now
remove the change output
Although the CreateTransaction loop currently remains, it should be
largely unused. KnapsackSolver will now account for transaction fees
when doing its selection.
In the previous commit, SelectCoinsMinConf was refactored to have some
calculations become shared for KnapsackSolver and SelectCoinsBnB. In
this commit, KnapsackSolver will now use the not_input_fees and
effective_feerate so that it include the fee for non-input things
(excluding a change output) so that the algorithm will select enough to
cover those fees. This is necessary for selecting on effective values.
Additionally, the OutputGroups
created for KnapsackSolver will actually have their effective values
calculated and set, and KnapsackSolver will do its selection on those
effective values.
Lastly, SelectCoins is modified to use the same value for preselected
inputs for BnB and KnapsackSolver. While it will still use the real
value when subtracting the fee from outputs, this behavior will be
the same regardless of the algo used for selecting additional inputs.
