Looks like James hardcoded a couple hashes in hard-to-find places, which
caused a unit test to fail. I just changed the hash (which covers UTXO
data which naturally will be different for us on account of our differently
formatted CTxOuts).
TODO: determine how Assumeutxo interacts with the fact that we don't save
out nonces in our normal UTXO serialization. Probably we will need to remove
the nonce from the CCoinStats serialization to avoid having inconsistent
hashes across nodes, since these hashes are now checked in assumeutxo?
fadcd3f78e doc: Remove irrelevant link to GitHub (MarcoFalke)
fa121b628d blockstorage: [refactor] Use chainman reference where possible (MarcoFalke)
fa0c7d9ad2 move-only: Move *Disk functions to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
fa91b2b2b3 move-only: Move AbortNode to shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fa413f07a1 move-only: Move ThreadImport to blockstorage (MarcoFalke)
faf843c07f refactor: Move load block thread into ChainstateManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This picks up the closed pull request #21030 and is the first step toward fixing #21220.
The basic idea is to move all disk access into a separate module with benefits:
* Breaking down the massive files init.cpp and validation.cpp into logical units
* Creating a standalone-module to reduce the mental complexity
* Pave the way to fix validation related circular dependencies
* Pave the way to mock disk access for testing, especially where it is performance critical (like fuzzing)
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e, checked (almost) moved only changes. This is a nice tidy up change and doesn't change behavior. Easily reviewed commit by commit.
jamesob:
ACK fadcd3f78e ([`jamesob/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21575.1.MarcoFalke.refactor_create_blocksto))
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fadcd3f78e. New organization makes sense, moves extraneous things outside of validation.cpp. PR is also easy to review with helpfully split up moveonly commits.
Tree-SHA512: 917996592b6d8f9998289d8cb2b1b78b23d1fdb3b07216c9caec1380df33baa09dc2c1e706da669d440b497e79c9c62a01ca20dc202df5ad974a75f3ef7a143b
ebc4ab721b refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups (fanquake)
57e980d13c scripted-diff: remove Optional & nullopt (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Same rationale & motivation as #21404, which turned out to be quite low in the number of potential conflicts. Lets see what the bot has to say here.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK ebc4ab721b: patch looks correct
jnewbery:
utACK ebc4ab721b
laanwj:
Code review ACK ebc4ab721b
Tree-SHA512: 550fbeef09b9d35ddefaa805d1755c18c8fd499c4b0f77ebfece8c20296a7abd1cf6c699e2261f92fe3552deeb7555ec2a2287ffe3ab9e98bb9f8612a4d43be3
84716b134e Add "index/blockfilterindex -> validation -> index/blockfilterindex" to expected circular dependencies (Jonas Schnelli)
ab3a0a2fb9 Add functional test for blockfilterindex in prune-mode (Jonas Schnelli)
c286a22f7b Add debug startup parameter -fastprune for more effective pruning tests (Jonas Schnelli)
5e112269c3 Avoid pruning below the blockfilterindex sync height (Jonas Schnelli)
00d57ff768 Avoid accessing nullpointer in BaseIndex::GetSummary() (Jonas Schnelli)
6abe9f5b11 Allow blockfilter in conjunction with prune (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Maintaining the blockfilterindexes in prune mode is possible and may lead to efficient p2p based rescans of wallets (restore backups, import/sweep keys) beyond the prune height (rescans not part of that PR).
This PR allows running the blockfilterindex(es) in conjunction with pruning.
* Bitcoind/Qt will shutdown during startup when missing block data has been detected ([re]enable `-blockfilterindex` when we already have pruned)
* manual block pruning is disabled during blockfilterindex sync
* auto-pruning is delayed during blockfilterindex sync
ToDos:
* [x] Functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 84716b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84716b134e. Only changes since last review were suggested new FindFilesToPrune argument and test.
benthecarman:
tACK 84716b134e
Tree-SHA512: 91d832c6c562c463f7ec7655c08956385413a99a896640b9737bda0183607fac530435d03d87c3c0e70c61ccdfe73fe8f3639bc7d26d33ca7e60925ebb97d77a
Values for mainnet and testnet will be specified in a follow-up PR that can be
scrutinized accordingly. This structure is required for use in snapshot activation
logic.
53e716ea11 [refactor] improve style for touched code (gzhao408)
174cb5330a [refactor] const ATMPArgs and non-const Workspace (gzhao408)
f82baf0762 [refactor] return MempoolAcceptResult (gzhao408)
9db10a5506 [refactor] clean up logic in testmempoolaccept (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
This is the first 4 commits of #20833, and does refactoring only. It should be relatively simple to review, and offers a few nice things:
- It makes accessing values that don't make sense (e.g. fee) when the tx is invalid an error.
- Returning `MempoolAcceptResult` from ATMP makes the interface cleaner. The caller can get a const instead of passing in a mutable "out" param.
- We don't have to be iterating through a bunch of lists for package validation, we can just return a `std::vector<MempoolAcceptResult>`.
- We don't have to refactor all ATMP call sites again if/when we want to return more stuff from it.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 53e716ea11💿
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 53e716ea11
ariard:
Code Review ACK 53e716e, I did tweak a bit the touched paths to see if we had good test coverage. Didn't find holes.
Tree-SHA512: fa6ec324a08ad9e6e55948615cda324cba176255708bf0a0a0f37cedb7a75311aa334ac6f223be7d8df3c7379502b1081102b9589f9a9afa1713ad3d9ab3c24f
