fa00447442 scripted-diff: Use clang-tidy syntax for C++ named arguments (MarcoFalke)
fae13c3989 doc: Use clang-tidy comments in crypto_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Incorrect named args are source of bugs, like #22979.
To allow them being checked by `clang-tidy`, use a format it can understand.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK fa00447442
rajarshimaitra:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23546/commits/fa00447442f22a24e5ca5fc538d0bf7bef575544
jonatack:
ACK fa00447442
fanquake:
ACK fa00447442
Tree-SHA512: 4d23a8363da81dfea21a4cd8516ab5e0dc70119e4d503f3f240f38573218b2c2e84083b97e956c62942d78b2f17490f8b3b2e8077d257644fda1d901e2b80507
When calculating the fee for a given tx size from a fee rate, we should
always round up to the next satoshi. Otherwise, if we round down (via
truncation), the calculated fee may result in a fee with a feerate
slightly less than targeted.
This is particularly important for coin selection as a slightly lower
feerate than expected can result in a variety of issues.
97cea1a93a policy: unit test Segwit dust thresholds (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This is the unit testing part of #22779, hence without the threshold modification.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 97cea1a93a
benthecarman:
crACK 97cea1a93a
Tree-SHA512: 96fb194709ae44364455eb920ed3ecff2e11e5327e0a72b9eeec9f9445894302099a0c4ffb1e0c8d4d523c0bfe06c57f1ebb0c03cf3389a73f518e3b174c45aa
I really dislike this PR, which inverts the meaning of the validation
flags used by unit tests, adds a zillion ~s to the source to handle
this, does a ton of iterations resulting in massive error message
spam if any new flags (e.g. Elements' NO_SIGHASH_BYTE) do surprising
things.
It also adds a new compiler warning, which I didn't fix to keep
the diff minimal .
b109bde46a [test] check that mapFlagNames is up to date (glozow)
5d3ced72f9 [test] remove unnecessary OP_1s from invalid tests (glozow)
5aee73d175 [test] minor improvements / followups (glozow)
8a365df558 [test] fix bug in ExcludeIndividualFlags (glozow)
8cac2923f5 [test] remove invalid test from tx_valid.json (glozow)
Pull request description:
This is a followup to #19698.
- There was a bug in the `ExcludeIndividualFlags` function which is fixed here.
- Fixing this bug also showed that there is a test that's supposed to fail (already existing in tx_invalid.json) in tx_valid.json, so I removed it. Other than that, the tests should all pass.
- Also implements a few suggestions I received offline: removing the `OP_1`s from the invalid tests (similar to 19db590d04), comments, and style.
- A few other small fixes, like adding asserts, putting all the flags in `mapFlagNames`, better error messages
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK b109bde46a
Tree-SHA512: 7233a8c0f1ae1172fac8000ea6e05384ecf79074c39948d118464868505c7f02f17e96503c81bd05c07adb2087648a5d93d9899e16fdefa6b7efcb51319444a9
There is no way to iterate through all script verification flags, and
it's not guaranteed that every power of 2 is used. Just make sure that
all flags in STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS are present in mapFlagNames;
this covers all consensus and policy flags. If mapFlagNames has more
flags than STANDARD_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS, that's okay. Nonexistent flags
will be caught by the compiler.
Add missing script verify flags to mapFlagNames.
iterate through mapFlagNames values instead of bits.
BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE better reports which test failed exactly, whereas
BOOST_ERROR was just incrementing the error counter.
Remove the implicit MissingDataBehavior::ASSERT_FAIL in the
*TransationSignatureChecker constructors, and instead specify
it explicit in all call sites:
* Test code uses ASSERT_FAIL
* Validation uses ASSERT_FAIL (through CachingTransactionSignatureChecker)
(including signet)
* libconsensus uses FAIL, matching the existing behavior of the
non-amount API (and the extended required data for taproot validation
is not available yet)
* Signing code uses FAIL
2a39ccf133 Add include for std::bind. (sinetek)
Pull request description:
Hi, this patch adds in <functional> because the GUI code makes use of std::bind.
That's all.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 2a39ccf133
Tree-SHA512: fb5ac07d9cd5d006182b52857b289a9926362a2f1bfa4f7f1c78a088670e2ccf39ca28214781df82e8de3909fa3e69685fe1124a7e3ead758575839f5f2277a9
bb6fcc75d1 refactor: Drop boost::thread stuff in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
6784ac471b bench: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
dba30695fc test: Use CCheckQueue local thread pool (Hennadii Stepanov)
01511776ac Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ef938685b refactor: Use member initializers in CCheckQueue (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- gets rid of `boost::thread_group` in the `CCheckQueue` class
- allows thread safety annotation usage in the `CCheckQueue` class
- is alternative to #14464 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-616618525, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18710#issuecomment-617291612)
Also, with this PR (I hope) it could be easier to resurrect a bunch of brilliant ideas from #9938.
Related: #17307
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1
LarryRuane:
ACK bb6fcc75d1
jonatack:
Code review ACK bb6fcc75d1 and verified rebase to master builds cleanly with unit/functional tests green
Tree-SHA512: fddeb720d5a391b48bb4c6fa58ed34ccc3f57862fdb8e641745c021841c8340e35c5126338271446cbd98f40bd5484f27926aa6c3e76fa478ba1efafe72e73c1
