Looks like James hardcoded a couple hashes in hard-to-find places, which
caused a unit test to fail. I just changed the hash (which covers UTXO
data which naturally will be different for us on account of our differently
formatted CTxOuts).
TODO: determine how Assumeutxo interacts with the fact that we don't save
out nonces in our normal UTXO serialization. Probably we will need to remove
the nonce from the CCoinStats serialization to avoid having inconsistent
hashes across nodes, since these hashes are now checked in assumeutxo?
Includes a memory leak in the checkqueue unit test (but not in
the actual code). WE really need to switch our checkqueue to use
std::unique_pointer rather than bare pointers. But this would be
invasive enough that I want to do it in a followup PR.
Also pretty-much disable the validation_flush_cache unit test.
This is a stupid and irritating test which tries to unit-test
exact memory usage of std containers. It already has at least
one "remove wrong assumptions" update upstream and after many
tries I was unable to change all the magic numbers in a way
that'd consistently pass CI for Elements.
Also adds a couple ubsan suppressions about perfectly-legitimate
conversions of integer types.
84716b134e Add "index/blockfilterindex -> validation -> index/blockfilterindex" to expected circular dependencies (Jonas Schnelli)
ab3a0a2fb9 Add functional test for blockfilterindex in prune-mode (Jonas Schnelli)
c286a22f7b Add debug startup parameter -fastprune for more effective pruning tests (Jonas Schnelli)
5e112269c3 Avoid pruning below the blockfilterindex sync height (Jonas Schnelli)
00d57ff768 Avoid accessing nullpointer in BaseIndex::GetSummary() (Jonas Schnelli)
6abe9f5b11 Allow blockfilter in conjunction with prune (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Maintaining the blockfilterindexes in prune mode is possible and may lead to efficient p2p based rescans of wallets (restore backups, import/sweep keys) beyond the prune height (rescans not part of that PR).
This PR allows running the blockfilterindex(es) in conjunction with pruning.
* Bitcoind/Qt will shutdown during startup when missing block data has been detected ([re]enable `-blockfilterindex` when we already have pruned)
* manual block pruning is disabled during blockfilterindex sync
* auto-pruning is delayed during blockfilterindex sync
ToDos:
* [x] Functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 84716b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84716b134e. Only changes since last review were suggested new FindFilesToPrune argument and test.
benthecarman:
tACK 84716b134e
Tree-SHA512: 91d832c6c562c463f7ec7655c08956385413a99a896640b9737bda0183607fac530435d03d87c3c0e70c61ccdfe73fe8f3639bc7d26d33ca7e60925ebb97d77a
e829c9afbf refactor: replace sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) by std::size (C++17) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
365539c846 refactor: init vectors via std::{begin,end} to avoid pointer arithmetic (Sebastian Falbesoner)
63d4ee1968 refactor: iterate arrays via C++11 range-based for loops if idx is not needed (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This refactoring PR picks up the idea of #19626 and replaces all occurences of `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` (or `sizeof(x)/sizeof(*x)`, respectively) with the now-available C++17 [`std::size`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/iterator/size) (as [suggested by sipa](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#issuecomment-666487228)), making the macro `ARRAYLEN` obsolete.
As preparation for this, two other changes are done to eliminate `sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])` usage:
* all places where arrays are iterated via an index are changed to use C++11 range-based for loops If the index' only purpose is to access the array element (as [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19626#discussion_r463404541)).
* `std::vector` initializations are done via `std::begin` and `std::end` rather than using pointer arithmetic to calculate the end (also [suggested by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20429#discussion_r567418821)).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK e829c9afbf: patch looks correct
fanquake:
ACK e829c9afbf
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e829c9afbf 🌩
Tree-SHA512: b01d32c04b9e04d562b7717cae00a651ec9a718645047a90761be6959e0cc2adbd67494e058fe894641076711bb09c3b47a047d0275c736f0b2218e1ce0d193d
Values for mainnet and testnet will be specified in a follow-up PR that can be
scrutinized accordingly. This structure is required for use in snapshot activation
logic.
This commit adds signet support, which is a little bit silly/redundant for us :)
Was a surprisingly easy merge to handle, and hopefully in future Core is more
mindful of signed blocks when they are changing code architecture.
I had to change a couple lines of src/signet.cpp to add blank assets to the
CTxOuts and to find transaction input scriptWitnesses. No need to add any
other tx witness data (and the CAsset()s that I did add to make things compile
won't be used..) because signet will always have g_con_elementsmode off.
FIXME: we disable standardness checks for the non-PAK node in the PAK tests.
This is because of a bug in Elements which causes non-PAK nodes to reject
pegouts for standardness reasons. Need to fix it after the rebase.
