Looks like James hardcoded a couple hashes in hard-to-find places, which
caused a unit test to fail. I just changed the hash (which covers UTXO
data which naturally will be different for us on account of our differently
formatted CTxOuts).
TODO: determine how Assumeutxo interacts with the fact that we don't save
out nonces in our normal UTXO serialization. Probably we will need to remove
the nonce from the CCoinStats serialization to avoid having inconsistent
hashes across nodes, since these hashes are now checked in assumeutxo?
Bitcoin allocates 32M for signature caching by default, split
between a signature cache and a script validity cache (see
Core #10192). Since 0.14 we have added an additional 32M for
rangeproof caching *and* an additional 32M for surjectionproof
caching.
These cache entries cost a bit over 32 bytes, so these are room
for a million entries....or 4Gb of rangeproofs and 300M of
surjection proofs.
Presumably we did not intend to triple memory usage relative to
Core to deal with some champagne problem in which our mempool is
overfilled ten times with pure rangeproofs. So put the total
default cache size back to 32M. This should have no performance
hit under realistic circumstances and should reduce CI OOM failures.
On my system we now use 50M rather than 110M during the fedpeg
test; we still use 18M that Core does not by having three additional
global secp contexts (one in blind.cpp, one in pegins.cpp, one in
confidential_validation.cpp) but we can settle that in a future
commit.
Several conflicts in the C++ code related to the new `flags` parameter
to `CheckSignature` and the corresponding function being renamed upstream
to `CheckSignatureECDSA`.
Several conflicts in the test harness as Steven sorta pulled the new
upstream ECKey module into the Python code, and the actual upstream
code was slightly different. Also needed to update the feature_taproot
code to always use the non-RANGEPROOF sighash since dynafed is not
enabled in the Taproot test.
Also had to pull the `set_wif` method out of `ECKey` and inline it because
otherwise it triggers a "circular inclusion" error between script.py (which
would pull in `base58_to_bytes` from address.py) and address.py (which now
pulls in some taproot EC related stuff from script.py).
Noticed that #960 does not test the "sighash rangeproof flag set but no
witnesses" case.
14a42a018 Add two missing dynafed fields to getblockchaininfo (Steven Roose)
fe0372933 dynafed: Support changing mainnet dynafed activation (Steven Roose)
ce7a93d93 dynafed: Only verify proposed parameters if they differ from current (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
- support blocksigners specifying their own activation to make coordination a bit more flexible
- don't force fedpeg script to change in order to change the block signing script
Tree-SHA512: 8dd66440261f910b083f7ed461e1930c9380350e3648f6aca44726c39dcca3bb7e62c36d36ae56c2717827fbaee2b9046c6ce0b05441c1d8d1b54f3c284bc4d7
25c57d6409 [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go. (Amiti Uttarwar)
ad5f01b960 [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declaration (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Based on reviewing #21188
the first commit switches the lock annotations on `CheckInputScripts` to be on the function declaration instead of on the function definition. this ensures that all call sites are checked, not just ones that come after the definition.
the second commit adds a note to the developer-notes section to clarify where the annotations should be applied.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 25c57d6409🥘
promag:
Code review ACK 25c57d6409.
Tree-SHA512: 61b6ef856bf6c6016d535fbdd19daf57b9e59fe54a1f30d47282a071b9b9d60b2466b044ee57929e0320cb1bdef52e7a1687cacaa27031bbc43d058ffffe22ba
Several other parameters are now redundant since they can be safely
obtained from the chainstate given that ::cs_main is locked. These are
now removed.
84716b134e Add "index/blockfilterindex -> validation -> index/blockfilterindex" to expected circular dependencies (Jonas Schnelli)
ab3a0a2fb9 Add functional test for blockfilterindex in prune-mode (Jonas Schnelli)
c286a22f7b Add debug startup parameter -fastprune for more effective pruning tests (Jonas Schnelli)
5e112269c3 Avoid pruning below the blockfilterindex sync height (Jonas Schnelli)
00d57ff768 Avoid accessing nullpointer in BaseIndex::GetSummary() (Jonas Schnelli)
6abe9f5b11 Allow blockfilter in conjunction with prune (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Maintaining the blockfilterindexes in prune mode is possible and may lead to efficient p2p based rescans of wallets (restore backups, import/sweep keys) beyond the prune height (rescans not part of that PR).
This PR allows running the blockfilterindex(es) in conjunction with pruning.
* Bitcoind/Qt will shutdown during startup when missing block data has been detected ([re]enable `-blockfilterindex` when we already have pruned)
* manual block pruning is disabled during blockfilterindex sync
* auto-pruning is delayed during blockfilterindex sync
ToDos:
* [x] Functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 84716b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 84716b134e. Only changes since last review were suggested new FindFilesToPrune argument and test.
benthecarman:
tACK 84716b134e
Tree-SHA512: 91d832c6c562c463f7ec7655c08956385413a99a896640b9737bda0183607fac530435d03d87c3c0e70c61ccdfe73fe8f3639bc7d26d33ca7e60925ebb97d77a
