This merge from upstream split the rpcwallet file out into separate
files. Leftover Elements specific funtions were moved into
wallet/rpc/elements.cpp
Co-authored-by: James Dorfman <dorfmanjames@gmail.com>
e5b6aef612 Move CBlockFileInfo::ToString method where class is declared (Russell Yanofsky)
f7086fd8ff Add src/wallet/* code to wallet:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
90fc8b089d Add src/node/* code to node:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There are no code changes, this is just adding `namespace` and `using` declarations and `node::` or `wallet::` qualifiers in some places.
Motivations for this change are:
- To make it easier to see when node and wallet code is being accessed places where it shouldn't be. For example if GUI code is accessing node and wallet internals or if wallet and node code are referencing each other.
- To make source code organization clearer ([#15732](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15732)), being able to know that `wallet::` code is in `src/wallet/`, `node::` code is in `src/node/`, `init::` code is in `src/init/`, `util::` code is in `src/util/`, etc.
Reviewing with `git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.` can be helpful to verify this is only updating declarations, not changing code.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5b6aef612
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK e5b6aef612🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3797745c90246794e2d55a2ee6e8b0ad5c811e4e03a242d3fdfeb68032f8787f0d48ed4097f6b7730f540220c0af99ef423cd9dbe7f76b2ec12e769a757a2c8d
`fs::path` looks more native than `std::string` for a parameter which
represents a backup file. This change eliminates back-and-forth type
conversions.
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in
recent review club as https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was
particularly unclear how interfaces::WalletClient was different from
interfaces::Wallet.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
ren WalletClient WalletLoader
ren walletClient walletLoader
ren wallet_client wallet_loader
ren "wallet clients release the wallet" "wallet pointer owners release the wallet"
ren "wallet client" "wallet loader"
ren "Wallet client" "Wallet loader"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Currently restorewallet() logic is written in the RPC layer
and it can´t be reused by GUI. So it reimplements this in the
wallet and interface sections and then, GUI can access it.
Current CWalletTx state representation makes it possible to set
inconsistent states that won't be handled correctly by wallet sync code
or serialized & deserialized back into the same form.
For example, it is possible to call setConflicted without setting a
conflicting block hash, or setConfirmed with no transaction index. And
it's possible update individual m_confirm and fInMempool data fields
without setting an overall consistent state that can be serialized and
handled correctly.
Fix this without changing behavior by using std::variant, instead of an
enum and collection of fields, to represent sync state, so state
tracking code is safer and more legible.
This is a first step to fixing state tracking bugs
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking,
by adding an extra margin of safety that can prevent new bugs from being
introduced as existing bugs are fixed.
There is no change in behavior. This just helps prepare for the
transition from boost::filesystem to std::filesystem by avoiding calls
to methods which will be unsafe after the transaction to std::filesystem
to due lack of a boost::filesystem::path::imbue equivalent and inability
to set a predictable locale.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kiminuo <kiminuo@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Followup to commit "MOVEONLY: CWallet transaction code out of
wallet.cpp/.h" that detaches and renames some CWalletTx methods, making
into them into standalone functions or CWallet methods instead.
There are no changes in behavior and no code changes that aren't purely
mechanical. It just gives spend and receive functions more consistent
names and removes the circular dependencies added by the earlier
MOVEONLY commit.
There are also no comment or documentation changes. Removed comments
from transaction.h are just migrated to spend.h, receive.h, and
wallet.h.
There are a few layers of bullshit to this PR.
First, there is the fact that it adds a functional test gated on a new
config flag which is disabled by default, so it actually adds broken
code with no tests, waiting to ruin your day 520 PRs later when #21935
enables the broken test.
Second, the test appears to be superficially nonsensical because it
generates two transactions from different wallets and tries to compare
them for byte-for-byte equality, which doesn't make sense (at least)
because change outputs are randomly located...so something fishy is
going on.
Of course, in Elements the transactions are *not* equal half the time
because the outputs are permuted, which may have let me quickly figure
out the issue, except...
Third, there is a red herring of a bug where the two transactions have
slightly different feerates. This turns out to be caused by
CWallet::CalculateMaximumSignedTxSize using differently sized dummy
transactions depending on whether watchonly outputs are included (this
fact is conveniently disguised by #17211 slightly changing this logic;
this is an unmerged PR in Core that Elements has a backport of an old
version of). And the two wallets have different watchonly settings.
A sub-red-herring is the fact that this bug results in a discrepancy
of 0.25 vbytes, so it does not appear in Core but does appear in
Elements (there is a 3/16 probability that we should be so unlucky...
we are).
But this is all irrelevant, because...
Fourth, this test is actually super bullshit. The way it works is by
constructing a PSBT legitimately, saving this to disk, then re-"signs"
using the external signer interface by using a mock signer that
COMPLETELY REPLACES THE TRANSACTION UNDER CONSTRUCTION. So it doesn't
matter what the fee output looks like and it doesn't matter what the
order of the outputs. Core does not detect this malfeasance and
neither does Elements. For some reason, Core has a functional test
that explicitly checks that you can do this even though it is insane
and it is hard to think of non-malicious reasons to do it.
Fifth, while Elements fails to detect that its external signer is
actually changing the transaction out from under it, it DOES assume
that this won't happen. In CWallet::SignPSBT it blithely un-replaces
the transaction, which undermines the functional test.
Sixth, the original PR where this test was introduced has comments
locked, so anyone who spent six hours reverse-engineering this idiotic
broken test, and is still feeling charitable enough to discuss it with
the Core developors, can go pound sand.
Anyway, just disabled the broken test and move on with our lives.
Move fillPSBT input-output argument before output-only arguments. This is a
temporary workaround which can go away with improvements to libmultiprocess
code generator. Currently code generator figures out order of input-output
parameters by looking at input list, but it would make more sense for it to
take order from output list, so input-only parameters still have to be first
but there is more flexibility for the other parameters.
