31b136e580 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e580
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e580
theStack:
ACK 31b136e580❄️
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
cc3044ccdb fix misleading comment about call to non-existing function (pox)
Pull request description:
The comment seems to be describing the subsequent call to `SyncTransaction` but refers to it as `SyncNotifications`, which is not any function currently in the codebase.
It's best to just remove the "what" aspect of the comment and focus on the "why", which also reduces the risk of similar documentation errors in the future, in case the function ever gets renamed, for example.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK cc3044ccdb
Tree-SHA512: 882ff17836ef585a603dc504f3dd21f56f682e49b28a0998f23fd16025826fbb083b7978db3ee70d0e0ff2c86fd6c3fd99a2361e5d45c765fdc5822c5f14c0a7
fac39c1983 wallet: document that tx in CreateTransaction is purely an out-param (MarcoFalke)
faac31521b Remove unused and confusing CTransaction constructor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The constructor is confusing and dangerous (as explained in the TODO), fix that by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fac39c1983
promag:
Code review ACK fac39c1983.
theStack:
Code review ACK fac39c1983
Tree-SHA512: e0c8cffce8d8ee0166b8e1cbfe85ed0657611e26e2af0d69fde70eceaa5d75cbde3eb489af0428fe4fc431360b4c791fb1cc21b8dee7d4c7a4f17df00836229d
9b74461fa2 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa)
021feb3187 refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 9b74461fa2
meshcollider:
utACK 9b74461fa2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b74461fa2. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like
Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
