Add TransactionError to node namespace and include it directly instead of
relying on indirect include through common/messages.h
This is a followup to a previous commit which moved the TransactionError enum.
These changes were done in a separate followup just to keep the previous commit
more minimal and easy to review.
Add separate PSBTError enum instead of reusing TransactionError enum for PSBT
operations, and drop unused error codes. The error codes returned by PSBT
operations and transaction broadcast functions mostly do not overlap, so using
an unified enum makes it harder to call any of these functions and know which
errors actually need to be handled.
Define PSBTError in the common library because PSBT functionality is
implemented in the common library and used by both the node (for rawtransaction
RPCs) and the wallet.
We make the Satisfier a base in which to store the common methods
between the Tapscript and P2WSH satisfier, and from which they both
inherit.
A field is added to SignatureData to be able to satisfy pkh() under
Tapscript context (to get the pubkey hash preimage) without wallet data.
For instance in `finalizepsbt` RPC. See also the next commits for a
functional test that exercises this.
6e9f8bb050 rpc, tests: in `utxoupdatepsbt` also look for the transaction in the txindex (ishaanam)
a5b4883fb4 rpc: extract psbt updating logic into ProcessPSBT (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
Previously the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC, added in #13932, only updated the inputs spending segwit outputs with the `witness_utxo`, because the full transaction is needed for legacy inputs. Before this RPC looked for just the utxos in the utxo set and the mempool. This PR makes it so that if the user has txindex enabled, then the full transaction is looked for there for all inputs. If it is not found in the txindex or txindex isn't enabled, then the mempool is checked for the full transaction. If the transaction an input is spending from is still not found at that point, then the utxo set is searched and the inputs spending segwit outputs are updated with just the utxo.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Xekyo:
ACK 6e9f8bb050
Tree-SHA512: 078db3c37a1ecd5816d80a42e8bd1341e416d661f508fa5fce0f4e1249fefd7b92a0d45f44957781cb69d0953145ef096ecdd4545ada39062be27742402dac6f
Previously only the segwit utxos being spent by the psbt were looked for and
added to the psbt. Now, the full transaction corresponding to each of these
utxos (legacy and segwit) is looked for in the txindex and mempool and added
to the psbt. If txindex is disabled and the transaction is not in the mempool,
then we fall back to getting just the utxo (if segwit) from the utxo set.
6c7a17a8e0 psbt: support externally provided preimages for Miniscript satisfaction (Antoine Poinsot)
840a396029 qa: add a "smart" Miniscript fuzz target (Antoine Poinsot)
17e3547241 qa: add a fuzz target generating random nodes from a binary encoding (Antoine Poinsot)
611e12502a qa: functional test Miniscript signing with key and timelocks (Antoine Poinsot)
d57b7f2021 refactor: make descriptors in Miniscript functional test more readable (Antoine Poinsot)
0a8fc9e200 wallet: check solvability using descriptor in AvailableCoins (Antoine Poinsot)
560e62b1e2 script/sign: signing support for Miniscripts with hash preimage challenges (Antoine Poinsot)
a2f81b6a8f script/sign: signing support for Miniscript with timelocks (Antoine Poinsot)
61c6d1a844 script/sign: basic signing support for Miniscript descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
4242c1c521 Align 'e' property of or_d and andor with website spec (Pieter Wuille)
f5deb41780 Various additional explanations of the satisfaction logic from Pieter (Pieter Wuille)
22c5b00345 miniscript: satisfaction support (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This makes the Miniscript descriptors solvable.
Note this introduces signing support for much more complex scripts than the wallet was previously able to solve, and the whole tooling isn't provided for a complete Miniscript integration in the wallet. Particularly, the PSBT<->Miniscript integration isn't entirely covered in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 6c7a17a8e0
sipa:
utACK 6c7a17a8e0 (to the extent that it's not my own code).
Tree-SHA512: a71ec002aaf66bd429012caa338fc58384067bcd2f453a46e21d381ed1bacc8e57afb9db57c0fb4bf40de43b30808815e9ebc0ae1fbd9e61df0e7b91a17771cc
Instead of having an entire TaprootBuilder which may or may not be
complete, and could potentially have future changes that interact oddly
with taproot tree tuples, have m_tap_tree be just the tuples.
When needed in other a TaprootBuilder for actual use, the tuples will be
added to a a TaprootBuilder that, in the future, can take in whatever
other data is needed as well.
Merging should be checking that the current PSBTOutput doesn't have a
taptree and the other one's is copied over. The original merging had
this inverted and would remove m_tap_tree if the other did not have it.
Base32/base64 are mechanisms for encoding binary data. That they'd
decode to a string is just bizarre. The fact that they'd do that
based on the type of input arguments even more so.
