55696a0ac3 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` (w0xlt)
bf19069c53 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionAddedToMempool` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR removes `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` and `transactionAddedToMempool`.
`mempool_sequence` is not used in these methods, only in ZMQ notifications.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26752/commits/55696a0ac30bcfbd555f71cbc8eac23b725f7dcf
Tree-SHA512: 621e89230bcb6edfed83e2758601a2b093822fc2dc4e9bfb00487e340f2bc4c5ac3bf6df3ca00b7fe55bb3df15858820f2bf698f403d2e48b915dd9eb47b63e0
This is useful for speeding up wallet rescans and is based on an
earlier version from PR #15845 ("wallet: Fast rescan with BIP157 block
filters"), which was never merged.
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
817326a828 wallet: avoid rescans if under the snapshot (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of assumed-valid blocks.
Of course in live code right now, `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` block index entries don't exist since they're a unique flag introduced by the use of UTXO snapshots, so this is prophylactic code exercised only by unittests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 817326a828
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 817326a828. This seems like the simplest change we can make to avoid wallet problems when an assumeutxo snapshot is loaded.
Tree-SHA512: cfa44b2eb33d1818d30df45210d0dde1e9b78cc9b7c88cb985054dc28427bba9e0905debe4196065d1d3a5ce7bca7e605e629d5ce5f0225b25395746e6d3d596
Replace CommitInternal method with CustomCommit and use interfaces::Chain
instead of CChainState to generate block locator.
This commit does not change behavior in any way, except in the
(m_best_block_index == nullptr) case, which was added recently in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24117 as part of an ongoing attempt to
prevent index corruption if bitcoind is interrupted during startup. New
behavior in that case should be slightly better than the old behavior (skipping
the entire custom+base commit now vs only skipping the base commit previously)
and this might avoid more cases of corruption.
Add new interfaces::BlockInfo struct to be able to pass extra block
information (file and undo information) to indexes which they are
updated to use high level interfaces::Chain notifications.
This commit does not change behavior in any way.
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from
scratch on the next load.
With this change, progress is saved every 60 seconds.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of
an unvalidated snapshot we're running -- in more general terms, if we
don't have data for the blocks.
7e88f61b28 multiprocess: Make interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive non-const (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
`interfaces::Chain` is an abstract class, so declaring the method const would be exposing internal implementation details of subclasses to interface callers. And specifically this doesn't work because the multiprocess implementation of the `interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive` method can't be const because IPC connection state and request state is not constant during the call.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23003/commits/7e88f61b285e6a356ea4f6ba384858f109559985
Tree-SHA512: 1c5ed89870aeb7170b9048c41299ab650dfa3d0978088e08c4c866fa0babb292722710b16f25540f26667220cb4747b1c256c4bd42893c552291eccc155346a3
interfaces::Chain is an abstract class, so declaring the method const
would be exposing internal implementation details of subclasses to
interface callers. And specifically this doesn't work because the
multiprocess implementation of the interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive
method can't be const because IPC connection state and request state is
not constant during the call.
5c5d0b6264 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b6264
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b6264 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more
simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to
determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So
in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output
variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to
read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send
them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote
process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With
FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read
or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final
output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the
block was found.
