4584d300a4 GUI: remove now unneeded 'm_balances' field from overviewpage (furszy)
050e8b1391 GUI: 'getAvailableBalance', use cached balance if the user did not select UTXO manually (furszy)
96e3264a82 GUI: use cached balance in overviewpage and sendcoinsdialog (furszy)
321335bf02 GUI: add getter for WalletModel::m_cached_balances field (furszy)
e62958dc81 GUI: sendCoinsDialog, remove duplicate wallet().getBalances() call (furszy)
Pull request description:
As per the title says, we are recalculating the entire wallet balance on different situations calling to `wallet().getBalances()`, when should instead make use of the wallet model cached balance.
This has the benefits of (1) not spending resources calculating a balance that we already have cached, and (2) avoid blocking the main thread for a long time, in case of big wallets, walking through the entire wallet's tx map more than what it's really needed.
Changes:
1) Fix: `SendCoinsDialog` was calling `wallet().getBalances()` twice during `setModel`.
2) Use the cached balance if the user did not select any UTXO manually inside the wallet model `getAvailableBalance` call.
-----------------------
As an extra note, this work born in [#25005](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25005) but grew out of scope of it.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 4584d300a4
hebasto:
re-ACK 4584d300a4, only suggested changes and commit message formatting since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/598#pullrequestreview-1071268192) review.
Tree-SHA512: 6633ce7f9a82a3e46e75aa7295df46c80a4cd4a9f3305427af203c9bc8670573fa8a1927f14a279260c488cc975a08d238faba2e9751588086fea1dcf8ea2b28
Plus, calculate the cached balance right when the wallet model, so the wallet widgets don't need to redo the same balance calculation multiple times when they are waiting for the model balance polling timer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
test wise: `WalletTests` now need to trigger the walletModel balance changed manually. So the model updates its internal state and can be used by the widgets.
This is because the test does not start the balance polling timer, in the same way as does not initialize several parts of the GUI workflow. All the objects (wallet, models, views, etc) that are used on this test are manually created instead of using the `WalletController` class flow.
Rationale is that this unit test is focused on verifying the GUI widgets/views behavior only: update the presented information, etc. when they receive different signals and/or function calls from outside (in other words, focus is on the signal slots/receiver side). It's not about whether the wallet balance polling timer is functioning as expected or not (which we definitely create a new test case for it in a follow-up work).
Rename `BResult` class to `util::Result` and update the class interface to be
more compatible with `std::optional` and with a full-featured result class
implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25665. Motivation for
this change is to update existing `BResult` usages now so they don't have to
change later when more features are added in #25665.
This change makes the following improvements originally implemented in #25665:
- More explicit API. Drops potentially misleading `BResult` constructor that
treats any bilingual string argument as an error. Adds `util::Error`
constructor so it is never ambiguous when a result is being assigned an error
or non-error value.
- Better type compatibility. Supports `util::Result<bilingual_str>` return
values to hold translated messages which are not errors.
- More standard and consistent API. `util::Result` supports most of the same
operators and methods as `std::optional`. `BResult` had a less familiar
interface with `HasRes`/`GetObj`/`ReleaseObj` methods. The Result/Res/Obj
naming was also not internally consistent.
- Better code organization. Puts `src/util/` code in the `util::` namespace so
naming reflects code organization and it is obvious where the class is coming
from. Drops "B" from name because it is undocumented what it stands for
(bilingual?)
- Has unit tests.
Watchonly wallets do not have any private keys to encrypt. It does not
make sense to encrypt such wallets, so disable the option to encrypt
them.
This avoids an assertion that can be hit when encrypting watchonly descriptor
wallets.
e5b6aef612 Move CBlockFileInfo::ToString method where class is declared (Russell Yanofsky)
f7086fd8ff Add src/wallet/* code to wallet:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
90fc8b089d Add src/node/* code to node:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There are no code changes, this is just adding `namespace` and `using` declarations and `node::` or `wallet::` qualifiers in some places.
Motivations for this change are:
- To make it easier to see when node and wallet code is being accessed places where it shouldn't be. For example if GUI code is accessing node and wallet internals or if wallet and node code are referencing each other.
- To make source code organization clearer ([#15732](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15732)), being able to know that `wallet::` code is in `src/wallet/`, `node::` code is in `src/node/`, `init::` code is in `src/init/`, `util::` code is in `src/util/`, etc.
Reviewing with `git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.` can be helpful to verify this is only updating declarations, not changing code.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5b6aef612
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK e5b6aef612🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3797745c90246794e2d55a2ee6e8b0ad5c811e4e03a242d3fdfeb68032f8787f0d48ed4097f6b7730f540220c0af99ef423cd9dbe7f76b2ec12e769a757a2c8d
742918c8ef qt: hide Create Unsigned button behind an expert mode option (Andrew Chow)
5c3b800acd qt: Add Create Unsigned button to SendConfirmationDialog (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of having different buttons or changing button behavior for making a PSBT, just have SendConfirmationDialog return whether the user wants a PSBT or a broadcasted transaction. Since this dialog is used by both the bumpFeeAction and the SendCoinsDialog, changes to both to support the different behavior is needed. They will check the return value of the SendConfirmationDialog for whether a PSBT needs to be created instead of checking whether private keys are disabled.
Strings used in this dialog are being slightly modified to work with both private keys enabled and disabled wallets.
Moved from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18789
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 742918c
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 742918c8ef. Just suggested changes since last review. Looks great!
hebasto:
ACK 742918c8ef, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: dd29f4364c7b4f15befe8fe63257b26187918786b005e0f8336183270b1a162680b93f6ced60f0285c6e607c084cc0d24950fc68a8f9c056521ede614041be66
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in
recent review club as https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was
particularly unclear how interfaces::WalletClient was different from
interfaces::Wallet.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
ren WalletClient WalletLoader
ren walletClient walletLoader
ren wallet_client wallet_loader
ren "wallet clients release the wallet" "wallet pointer owners release the wallet"
ren "wallet client" "wallet loader"
ren "Wallet client" "Wallet loader"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Instead of having different buttons or changing button behavior for
making a PSBT, just have SendConfirmationDialog return whether the user
wants a PSBT or a broadcasted transaction. Since this dialog is used
by both the bumpFeeAction and the SendCoinsDialog, changes to both
to support the different behavior is needed. They will check
the return value of the SendConfirmationDialog for whether a PSBT
needs to be created instead of checking whether private keys are
disabled.
Strings used in this dialog are being slightly modified to work with
both private keys enabled and disabled wallets.
Move fillPSBT input-output argument before output-only arguments. This is a
temporary workaround which can go away with improvements to libmultiprocess
code generator. Currently code generator figures out order of input-output
parameters by looking at input list, but it would make more sense for it to
take order from output list, so input-only parameters still have to be first
but there is more flexibility for the other parameters.
1c4b456e1a gui: send using external signer (Sjors Provoost)
24815c6309 gui: wallet creation detects external signer (Sjors Provoost)
3f845ea299 node: add externalSigners to interface (Sjors Provoost)
62ac119f91 gui: display address on external signer (Sjors Provoost)
450cb40a34 wallet: add displayAddress to interface (Sjors Provoost)
eef8d64529 gui: create wallet with external signer (Sjors Provoost)
6cdbc83e93 gui: add external signer path to options dialog (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This PR adds GUI support for external signers, based on the since merged bitcoin/bitcoin#16546 (RPC).
The UX isn't amazing - especially the blocking calls - but it works.
First we adds a GUI setting for the signer script (e.g. path to HWI):
<img width="625" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-08-05 om 19 32 59" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/62483415-e1ff1680-b7b7-11e9-97ca-8d2ce54ca1cb.png">
Then we add an external signer checkbox to the wallet creation dialog:
<img width="374" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-11-07 om 19 17 23" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/68416387-b57ee000-0194-11ea-9730-127d60273008.png">
It's checked by default if HWI detects a device. It also grabs the name. It then creates a fresh wallet and imports the keys.
You can verify an address on the device (blocking...):
<img width="673" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-08-05 om 19 29 22" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/62483560-43bf8080-b7b8-11e9-9902-8a036116dc4b.png">
Sending, including coin selection, Just Works(tm) as long the device is present.
~External signer support is enabled by default when the GUI is configured and Boost::Process is present.~
External signer support remains disabled by default, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21935.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 1c4b456e1a
hebasto:
ACK 1c4b456e1a, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (Qt 5.12.8) with HWW `2.0.2-rc.1`.
promag:
Tested ACK 1c4b456e1a but rebased with e033ca1379, with HWI 2.0.2, with Nano S and Nano X.
meshcollider:
re-code-review ACK 1c4b456e1a
Tree-SHA512: 3503113c5c69d40adb6ce364d8e7cae23ce82d032a00474ba9aeb6202eb70f496ef4a6bf2e623e5171e524ad31ade7941a4e0e89539c64518aaec74f4562d86b
f5ba424cd4 wallet: Add IsAddressUsed / SetAddressUsed methods (Russell Yanofsky)
62252c95e5 interfaces: Stop exposing wallet destdata to gui (Russell Yanofsky)
985430d9b2 test: Add gui test for wallet receive requests (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Stop giving GUI access to destdata rows in database. Replace with narrow API just for saving and reading receive request information.
This simplifies code and should prevent the GUI from interfering with other destdata like address-used status. It also adds some more GUI test coverage.
There are no changes in behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
tACK f5ba424cd4
laanwj:
Code review ACK f5ba424cd4
Tree-SHA512: 5423df4786e537a59013cb5bfb9e1bc29a7ca4b8835360c00cc2165a59f925fdc355907a4ceb8bca0285bb4946ba235bffa7645537a951ad03fd3b4cee17b6b0
