I really dislike this PR, which inverts the meaning of the validation
flags used by unit tests, adds a zillion ~s to the source to handle
this, does a ton of iterations resulting in massive error message
spam if any new flags (e.g. Elements' NO_SIGHASH_BYTE) do surprising
things.
It also adds a new compiler warning, which I didn't fix to keep
the diff minimal .
Similar to 19db590d04, which removed these
for the valid tests. Not removing ones that cause a false/empty stack
error because these tests should fail due to being invalid with CSV/CLTV
Instead of using /16 netgroups to bucket nodes in Addrman for connection
diversification, ASN, which better represents an actor in terms
of network-layer infrastructure, is used.
For testing, asmap.raw is used. It represents a minimal
asmap needed for testing purposes.
This commit adds comments referencing multiple CVEs both in production and test code.
CVEs covered in this commit:
CVE-2010-5137
CVE-2010-5139
CVE-2010-5141
CVE-2012-1909
CVE-2012-2459
CVE-2012-3789
CVE-2018-17144
1e747e3c1e Make segwit failure due to CLEANSTACK violation return a SCRIPT_ERR_CLEANSTACK error code. (Mark Friedenbach)
Pull request description:
If a segwit script terminates with a stack size not equal to one, the current error code is EVAL_FALSE. This is semantically wrong, and prevents explicitly checking CLEANSTACK violations in the unit tests. This PR changes the error code (and affected unit tests) to use SCRIPT_ERROR_CLEANSTACK instead of SCRIPT_ERROR_EVAL_FALSE.
Tree-SHA512: 8f7b1650f7a23a942cde1070e3e56420be456b4a7be42515b237e95557bf2bd5e7ba9aabd213c8092bea28c165dbe73f5a3486300089aeb01e698151b42484b1
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)):
>
> The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations:
>
> * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer.
> * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes.
> * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible.
>
> The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions).
Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
92f1f8b31 Split off key_io_tests from base58_tests (Pieter Wuille)
119b0f85e Split key_io (address/key encodings) off from base58 (Pieter Wuille)
ebfe217b1 Stop using CBase58Data for ext keys (Pieter Wuille)
32e69fa0d Replace CBitcoinSecret with {Encode,Decode}Secret (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains some of the changes left as TODO in #11167 (and built on top of that PR). They are not intended for backporting.
This removes the `CBase58`, `CBitcoinSecret`, `CBitcoinExtKey`, and `CBitcoinExtPubKey` classes, in favor of simple `Encode`/`Decode` functions. Furthermore, all Bitcoin-specific logic (addresses, WIF, BIP32) is moved to `key_io.{h,cpp}`, leaving `base58.{h,cpp}` as a pure utility that implements the base58 encoding/decoding logic.
Tree-SHA512: a5962c0ed27ad53cbe00f22af432cf11aa530e3efc9798e25c004bc9ed1b5673db5df3956e398ee2c085e3a136ac8da69fe7a7d97a05fb2eb3be0b60d0479655
