8e19dfa35b Specify PSET (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds the document specifying the new PSET format that #900 implements.
Pulled out of #900
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 892d27a5735fc581b0963b3e230cc028c08f7750a55c8b4030f9f909dee89910348fdc565739c6ec73ce206b7cfd08d3614ccaf884d5abc43a7470f36368ca43
faa05854f8 util: Remove probably misleading TODO (MarcoFalke)
fac5efe730 util: Add Assume() identity function (MarcoFalke)
fa861569dc util: Allow Assert(...) to be used in all contexts (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This is needed for #20138. Please refer to the added documentation for motivation.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faa05854f8
jnewbery:
utACK faa05854f8
hebasto:
ACK faa05854f8, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 72165fbd898b92ab9a79b070993fa1faa86c2e3545b6645e72c652bda295d5107bc298d0482bf3aaf0926fc0c3e6418a445c0e073b08568c44231f547f76a688
053b4fbad8 doc: Release note regarding -rpcauth validation (João Barbosa)
46001323b1 rpc: Validate -rpcauth arguments (João Barbosa)
d37c813a43 rpc: Refactor to process -rpcauth once (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Invalid `-rpcauth` arguments are currently silently ignored. This make server initialization fail if any `-rpcauth` is invalid.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 053b4fbad8
jonatack:
ACK 053b4fbad8
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 053b4fbad8. Only changes since last review are moving a variable declaration and adding a comment, release notes, and a `const`.
Tree-SHA512: c99923d4a121f0c9f882b07f5402ea53e9b2d9455ad34468a094ffab1d64df26c82e1279734c0d42bc2e113eae7b581fbc3be52f3ed4a2d7450d11793afcf406
I had to make up an onion service target port for Liquid and for our custom
params, so I chose 37041 and 37040 to roughly match how signet just adds
30000 to its normal port.
Adds a new "send" RPC which I didn't really look at too closely to match
our other RPC modifications. In particular our backport of #17211 adds a
"solving_data" field to other transaction-creation RPCs, but not this
one. (But I checked the current status of #17211 and Andy hasn't updated
upstream either, just passes NullUniValue to FundTransaction from `send`.
So that's what I did here.)
