asp: the point of this PR was to completely decouple libbitcoin_server from
bitcoin_tool; it removes $(LIBBITCOIN_SERVER) from the `elements_wallet_LDADD`.
I put this back in because our additional code related to pegin claiming makes
heavy use of methods from libbitcoin_server.
If we want to morally accept this PR then we need to do a nontrivial refactoring.
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will
automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically
on startup will be more useful in the GUI when the option to create wallets is
added in #15006, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
This fix is a based on the fix by Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18600.
Unlike that PR, which implements some new behavior, this just restores previous
wallet notification and status behavior for transactions removed from the
mempool because they conflict with transactions in a block. The behavior was
accidentally changed in two `CWallet::BlockConnected` updates:
a31be09bfd and
7e89994133 from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624, causing issue
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18325.
The change here could be improved and replaced with a more comprehensive
cleanup, so it includes a detailed comment explaining future considerations.
Fixes#18325
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr>
d044e0ec7d refactor: Remove override for final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
1551cea2d5 refactor: Use override for non-final overriders (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Two commits are split out from #16710 to make reviewing [easier](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16710#issuecomment-625760894).
From [C++ FAQ](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines.html#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final):
> C.128: Virtual functions should specify exactly one of virtual, override, or final
> **Reason** Readability. Detection of mistakes. Writing explicit `virtual`, `override`, or `final` is self-documenting and enables the compiler to catch mismatch of types and/or names between base and derived classes. However, writing more than one of these three is both redundant and a potential source of errors.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK d044e0ec7d: consistent use of `override` prevents bugs + patch looks correct + Travis happy
MarcoFalke:
ACK d044e0ec7d, based on my understanding that adding `override` or `final` to a function must always be correct, unless it doesn't compile!?
vasild:
ACK d044e0ec7
Tree-SHA512: 245fd9b99b8b5cbf8694061f892cb3435f3378c97ebed9f9401ce86d21890211f2234bcc39c9f0f79a4d2806cb31bf8ce41a0f9c2acef4f3a2ac5beca6b077cf
