I also moved some RPC methods that were not at the end of the file with
the other ELEMENTS RPC methods. This makes the diff on my machine look
crazy. Let's hope GitHub has more intelligent diffs..
1609809fb2 validation: Hold cs_main when reading chainActive in RewindBlockIndex (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fixes#15980.
Hold `cs_main` when reading `chainActive` (via `::ChainActive()`) in `RewindBlockIndex`.
ACKs for commit 160980:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 1609809fb2
Tree-SHA512: 54f180ab391f92f04950735c2bb337f0b7495826d2096f7a0f9a2da50bc29d08747f404a0495e33ca4edd4c842efbab4c4730d5e1a8b9da3e1249cf884268f4b
52ef283 Improve the fedpeg test with extra double claim tests (Steven Roose)
48a82fa Make claimpegin fail in the case of a double claim (Steven Roose)
af22646 Prevent pegin double spends from entering the mempool (Steven Roose)
50c5570 Report IsValidPeginWitness error message (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Fixes#612 and #613.
- prevents a double claim from entering mempool
- makes `claimpegin` throw an exception when trying to double claim a pegin
- check the last commit message on all the extra cases that are tested.
Tree-SHA512: dd9602cd4bc78a3e8f7a6b566f881ede09dba54900425348c1eb528268a3e869416e3c9ca97c1a8da4d120875ef59c4e21a857256312ce77e06b7b6ae04abf92
This bug got introduced with the 0.17 rebase. In 0.14.1 the double pegin
claim check was done in the beginning of the validation logic, where the
coins view was the actual UTXO set. In 0.17, Core moved several checks
because the intermediate method CheckInputs was removed and some logic
moved to tx_verify.cpp, where we also put the pegin check. In the
mempool acceptance check, however (as opposed to the ConnectBlock
check), CheckTxInputs is called with only a partial UTXO view for
optimization reasons. This commit adds an extra pegin check in the
beginning of the mempool code where we have a full UTXO view.
62d50ef308 Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This PR adds compile-time checking for negative locking requirements that follow from the run-time locking requirement `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)` in `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)`.
Changes:
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `CChainState::ActivateBestChain(…)`, `CChainState:: InvalidateBlock(…)` and `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(…)` which all call `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `InvalidateBlock(…)` which calls `CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `RewindBlockIndex(…)` which calls `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
ACKs for commit 62d50e:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 62d50ef308
Tree-SHA512: 73d092ccd08c851ae3c5d60370c369fc030c5793f5507e2faccb6f91c851ddc0ce059fbea3899f2856330d7a8c78f2ac6a2988e8268b03154f946be9e60e3be1
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
486c1eea86 refactoring: remove unused chainActive (James O'Beirne)
631940aab2 scripted-diff: replace chainActive -> ::ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
a3a609079c refactoring: introduce unused ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
1b6e6fcfd2 rename: CChainState.chainActive -> m_chain (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the assumeutxo project:
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This change refactors the `chainActive` reference into a `::ChainActive()` call. It also distinguishes `CChainState`'s `CChain` data member as `m_chain` instead of the current `chainActive`, which makes it easily confused with the global data.
The active chain must be obtained via function because its reference will be swapped at some point during runtime after loading a UTXO snapshot.
This change, though lengthy, should be pretty easy to review since most of it is contained within a scripted-diff. Once merged, the parent PR should be easier to review.
ACKs for commit 486c1e:
Sjors:
utACK 486c1ee
promag:
utACK 486c1ee.
practicalswift:
utACK 486c1eea86
Tree-SHA512: 06ed8f9e77f2d25fc9bea0ba86436d80dbbce90a1e8be23e37ec4eeb26060483e60b4a5c4fba679cb1867f61e3921c24abeb9cabdfb4d0a9b1c4ddd77b17456a
0ff1c2a838 Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime) (Suhas Daftuar)
54470e767b Assert validation reasons are contextually correct (Suhas Daftuar)
2120c31521 [refactor] Update some comments in validation.cpp as we arent doing DoS there (Matt Corallo)
12dbdd7a41 [refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible() (Matt Corallo)
aa502b88d1 scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
7721ad64f4 [refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed. (Matt Corallo)
5e78c5734b Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasons (Matt Corallo)
6b34bc6b6f Fix handling of invalid headers (Suhas Daftuar)
ef54b486d5 [refactor] Use Reasons directly instead of DoS codes (Matt Corallo)
9ab2a0412e CorruptionPossible -> BLOCK_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
6e55b292b0 CorruptionPossible -> TX_WITNESS_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
7df16e70e6 LookupBlockIndex -> CACHED_INVALID (Matt Corallo)
c8b0d22698 [refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossible (Matt Corallo)
34477ccd39 [refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
6a7f8777a0 Ban all peers for all block script failures (Suhas Daftuar)
7b999103e2 Clean up banning levels (Matt Corallo)
b8b4c80146 [refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut) (Matt Corallo)
8818729013 [refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode() (Matt Corallo)
00e11e61c0 [refactor] rename stateDummy -> orphan_state (Matt Corallo)
f34fa719cf Drop obsolete sigops comment (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This is a rebase of #11639 with some fixes for the last few comments which were not yet addressed.
The original PR text, with some strikethroughs of text that is no longer correct:
> This cleans up an old main-carryover - it made sense that main could decide what DoS scores to assign things because the DoS scores were handled in a different part of main, but now validation is telling net_processing what DoS scores to assign to different things, which is utter nonsense. Instead, we replace CValidationState's nDoS and CorruptionPossible with a general ValidationInvalidReason, which net_processing can handle as it sees fit. I keep the behavior changes here to a minimum, but in the future we can utilize these changes for other smarter behavior, such as disconnecting/preferring to rotate outbound peers based on them providing things which are invalid due to SOFT_FORK because we shouldn't ban for such cases.
>
> This is somewhat complementary with, though obviously conflicts heavily with #11523, which added enums in place of DoS scores, as well as a few other cleanups (which are still relevant).
>
> Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
>
> Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
> points to 100.
> Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
> instead of 10 DoS points.
> ~~BIP68-violation no longer results in a ban as it is SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Non-SegWit SigOp violation no longer results in a ban as it
> considers P2SH sigops and is thus SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Any script violation in a block no longer results in a ban as
> it may be the result of a SOFT_FORK. This should likely be
> fixed in the future by differentiating between them.~~
> Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
> Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
> too far in the future continue to not result in a ban.
> Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
> ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Note: The change to ban all peers for consensus violations is actually NOT the change I'd like to make -- I'd prefer to only ban outbound peers in those situations. The current behavior is a bit of a mess, however, and so in the interests of advancing this PR I tried to keep the changes to a minimum. I plan to revisit the behavior in a followup PR.
EDIT: One reviewer suggested I add some additional context for this PR:
> The goal of this work was to make net_processing aware of the actual reasons for validation failures, rather than just deal with opaque numbers instructing it to do something.
>
> In the future, I'd like to make it so that we use more context to decide how to punish a peer. One example is to differentiate inbound and outbound peer misbehaviors. Another potential example is if we'd treat RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE failures differently (ie after the next consensus change is implemented), and perhaps again we'd want to treat some peers differently than others.
ACKs for commit 0ff1c2:
jnewbery:
utACK 0ff1c2a838
ryanofsky:
utACK 0ff1c2a838. Only change is dropping the first commit (f3883a321bf4ab289edcd9754b12cae3a648b175), and dropping the temporary `assert(level == GetDoS())` that was in 35ee77f2832eaffce30042e00785c310c5540cdc (now c8b0d22698)
Tree-SHA512: e915a411100876398af5463d0a885920e44d473467bb6af991ef2e8f2681db6c1209bb60f848bd154be72d460f039b5653df20a6840352c5f7ea5486d9f777a3
Though at the moment ChainActive() simply references `g_chainstate.m_chain`,
doing this change now clears the way for multiple chainstate usage and allows
us to script the diff.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "chainActive" | grep -E '(h|cpp)$' | xargs sed -i '/chainActive =/b; /extern CChain& chainActive/b; s/\(::\)\{0,1\}chainActive/::ChainActive()/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can't be a scripted-diff due to the confusion of the global
chainActive and the CChainState member of the same name.
This specific rename makes the following chainActive -> ::ChainActive() diff
scriptable.
This is a first step towards cleaning up our DoS interface - make
validation return *why* something is invalid, and let net_processing
figure out what that implies in terms of banning/disconnection/etc.
Behavior change: peers will now be banned for providing blocks
with premature coinbase spends.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
* Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
points to 100.
* Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
instead of 10 DoS points.
* Many pre-segwit soft-fork errors now result in a ban.
Note: Transactions that violate soft-fork script flags since P2SH do not generally
result in a ban. Also, banning behavior for invalid blocks is dependent on
whether the node is validating with multiple script check threads, due to a long-
standing bug. That inconsistency is still present after this commit.
* Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
* Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
too far in the future continue to *not* result in a ban.
* Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
This comment was confusing and incorrect when first added ("invalid rather than
merely non-standard" has the opposite meaning of what is actually the case),
and was also not updated after segwit with the correct variable names.
Delete it since the code reads just fine on its own.
Co-authored by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
