Commit graph

1034 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Byron Hambly
8edcc34130 Merge 60b5795133 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23758) 2023-06-13 12:26:03 +00:00
Byron Hambly
54c9ee347d Merge 9635760ce8 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22777) 2023-06-13 10:06:36 +00:00
Byron Hambly
70c69d94f6 Merge 9f7661c0c4 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#19499) 2023-06-12 13:11:30 +00:00
Byron Hambly
b0b2f3deff Merge f6013265b7 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#20295) 2023-06-06 09:10:04 +00:00
Byron Hambly
16ce576d1d Merge e457513eb1 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23631) 2023-06-02 12:58:30 +00:00
James Dorfman
72a90148c8 Merge 8b1de78577 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23413) 2023-06-01 18:51:42 +00:00
James Dorfman
5aadbb7a9d Merge 63c0d0e937 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#21327)
I commented out a few new lines at the bottom of test/functional/p2p_ibd_txrelay.py
It tests that nodes process certain transactions, after IBD. These new assertions
from upstream are failing, but it may be because our IBD / tx sharing logic is different.

We should revisit this.
2023-06-01 05:27:06 +00:00
Byron Hambly
8250bf53d2 Merge 606e306277 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22981) 2023-05-26 13:47:21 +00:00
Byron Hambly
2da8f66309 Merge 38b2a0a3f9 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23173) 2023-05-24 11:45:57 +00:00
James Dorfman
df8f97d63b Merge 1847ce2d49 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23157) 2023-05-16 09:04:56 +00:00
Byron Hambly
7925c2a451 Merge 224e90d9fd into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23336) 2023-05-15 12:27:08 +00:00
Byron Hambly
06d3e29912 Merge 788909f3c7 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23042) 2023-05-14 11:08:09 +00:00
Byron Hambly
8299bec8a2 Merge c001da306b into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23325) 2023-05-14 10:52:15 +00:00
Byron Hambly
c1a05187a3 Merge 8a083bc5b5 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#23218) 2023-05-14 09:58:38 +00:00
Byron Hambly
9b7c9154fe Merge c4fc899442 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22950) 2023-05-09 12:21:13 +00:00
Byron Hambly
498907a233 Merge 816e15ee81 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22951) 2023-05-09 11:50:39 +00:00
Byron Hambly
4d68eaa81b Merge 4e1de1fc59 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22340) 2023-04-28 13:51:41 +00:00
Byron Hambly
eea9829aa6 Merge 825f4a64e6 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22976) 2023-04-24 11:40:49 +00:00
Byron Hambly
965ac7c53b Merge 58e02395ba into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22955) 2023-04-21 11:43:16 +00:00
Byron Hambly
6d32af1662 Merge 33707a2a88 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22782) 2023-04-11 08:18:04 +00:00
James Dorfman
cdbedba214 Merge dbcb5742c4 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#20541) 2023-04-11 01:40:34 +00:00
Byron Hambly
a797e5e55a Merge 4c87665707 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22604) 2023-04-09 07:26:48 +00:00
James Dorfman
815f4d545d Merge dd981b5e84 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22618) 2023-04-06 20:54:28 +00:00
Byron Hambly
b9ff9a6259 Merge 513e1071a1 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22616) 2023-04-06 13:35:05 +00:00
Byron Hambly
5f259e46c1 Merge 5b2d8661c9 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22577) 2023-04-06 13:24:41 +00:00
Byron Hambly
05f9a1a7c2 Merge 06788c6705 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#21528) 2023-04-04 11:04:30 +02:00
James Dorfman
c8526de70a Merge 67b9416540 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#21562) 2023-03-31 18:42:53 +00:00
Glenn Willen
4334fce793 Merge 61cefde7a7 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22006) 2023-03-28 00:12:41 +00:00
Glenn Willen
ac88de9825 Merge f372623807 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#22495) 2023-03-27 23:56:34 +00:00
James Dorfman
17e6efe7fe Merge 5d83e7d714 into merged_master (Bitcoin PR bitcoin/bitcoin#21090)
We comment out a newly-added assert from the Bitcoin
side, because it's unclear how to replicate it
correctly in Elements.

Co-authored-by: Glenn Willen <gwillen@nerdnet.org>
2023-03-22 01:11:20 +00:00
Pablo Greco
e7fea1d50b Fix underflow when blocks are ahead of headers 2023-02-21 06:22:25 -03:00
Glenn Willen
e8475e7edd Fix stuck IBD when discarding unwanted headers from peers.
When receiving unwanted headers from a peer, first check whether we have
recent "best known block" state for that peer. If not, accept one batch
of headers to refresh it. Otherwise, we can become stuck in a state where
we need blocks, but we don't know which peers have those blocks available.
This especially happens during startup, when we don't have this information
for any peers until we start processing header messages.
2023-01-24 22:05:36 -08:00
Glenn Willen
8cad8cda44 Further fixes from code review 2023-01-04 16:33:35 -08:00
Glenn Willen
29345e9e12 pgreco's startup crash fix 2022-12-12 09:53:44 -08:00
Glenn Willen
fba37b74b4 Move enough-headers check up, rejecting excess headers when received. 2022-12-12 09:53:44 -08:00
Glenn Willen
394e59d38d Politely and safely refuse getheaders requests for headers we have trimmed. 2022-12-12 09:53:44 -08:00
Glenn Willen
7e6fe4a5ba Don't let header syncing get too far ahead of block syncing 2022-12-12 09:53:44 -08:00
MacroFake
e4e201dfd9
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25290: [kernel 3a/n] Decouple CTxMemPool from ArgsManager
d1684beabe fees: Pass in a filepath instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
9a3d825c30 init: Remove redundant -*mempool*, -limit* queries (Carl Dong)
6c5c60c412 mempool: Use m_limit for UpdateTransactionsFromBlock (Carl Dong)
9e93b10301 node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
38af2bcf35 mempoolaccept: Use limits from mempool in constructor (Carl Dong)
9333427014 mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits (Carl Dong)
716bb5fbd3 scripted-diff: Rename anc/desc size limit vars to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
1ecc77321d scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_EXPIRY to indicate time unit (Carl Dong)
aa9141cd81 mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
51c7a41a5e init: Only determine maxmempool once (Carl Dong)
386c9472c8 mempool: Make GetMinFee() with custom size protected (Carl Dong)
82f00de7a6 mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs (Carl Dong)
f1941e8bfd pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions (Carl Dong)
0199bd35bb fuzz/rbf: Add missing TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
ccbaf546a6 scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE to indicate SI unit (Carl Dong)
fc02f77ca6 ArgsMan: Add Get*Arg functions returning optional (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18

  -----

  As mentioned in the Stage 1 Step 2 description of [the `libbitcoinkernel` project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24303), `ArgsManager` will not be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. Therefore, it is important that we remove any dependence on `ArgsManager` by code that will be part of `libbitcoinkernel`. This is the first in a series of PRs aiming to achieve this.

  This PR removes `CTxMemPool+MempoolAccept`'s dependency on `ArgsManager` by introducing a `CTxMemPool::Options` struct, which is used to specify `CTxMemPool`'s various options at construction time.

  These options are:
  - `-maxmempool` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::max_size`
  - `-mempoolexpiry` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry`
  - `-limitancestorcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_count`
  - `-limitancestorsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::ancestor_size`
  - `-limitdescendantcount` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_count`
  - `-limitdescendantsize` -> `CTxMemPool::Options::limits::descendant_size`

  More context can be gleaned from the commit messages. The important commits are:

  - 56eb479ded8bfb2ef635bb6f3b484f9d5952c70d "pool: Add and use MemPoolOptions, ApplyArgsManOptions"
  - a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
  - 6f4bf3ede5812b374828f08fc728ceded2f10024 "mempool: Pass in -mempoolexpiry instead of referencing gArgs"
  - 5958a7fe4806599fc620ee8c1a881ca10fa2dd16 "mempool: Introduce (still-unused) MemPoolLimits"

  Reviewers: Help needed in the following commits (see commit messages):
  - a1e08b70f3068f4e8def1c630d8f50cd54da7832 "mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs"
  - 0695081a797e9a5d7787b78b0f8289dafcc6bff7 "node/ifaces: Use existing MemPoolLimits"

  Note to Reviewers: There are perhaps an infinite number of ways to architect `CTxMemPool::Options`, the current one tries to keep it simple, usable, and flexible. I hope we don't spend too much time arguing over the design here since that's not the point. In the case that you're 100% certain that a different design is strictly better than this one in every regard, please show us a fully-implemented branch.

  -----

  TODO:
  - [x] Use the more ergonomic `CTxMemPool::Options` where appropriate
  - [x] Doxygen comments for `ApplyArgsManOptions`, `MemPoolOptions`

  -----

  Questions for Reviewers:
  1. Should we use `std::chrono::seconds` for `CTxMemPool::Options::expiry` and `CTxMemPool::m_expiry` instead of an `int64_t`? Something else? (`std::chrono::hours`?)
  2. Should I merge `CTxMemPool::Limits` inside `CTxMemPool::Options`?

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d1684beabe 🍜
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK d1684beabe. Just minor cleanups since last review, mostly switching to brace initialization

Tree-SHA512: 2c138e52d69f61c263f1c3648f01c801338a8f576762c815f478ef5148b8b2f51e91ded5c1be915e678c0b14f6cfba894b82afec58d999d39a7bb7c914736e0b
2022-06-29 09:13:31 +02:00
Carl Dong
82f00de7a6 mempool: Pass in -maxmempool instead of referencing gArgs
- Store the mempool size limit (-maxmempool) in CTxMemPool as a member.

- Remove the requirement to explicitly specify a mempool size limit for
  CTxMemPool::GetMinFee(...) and LimitMempoolSize(...), just use the
  stored mempool size limit where possible.

- Remove all now-unnecessary instances of:
    gArgs.GetIntArg("-maxmempool", DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE_MB) * 1000000

The code change in CChainState::GetCoinsCacheSizeState() is correct
since the coinscache should not repurpose "extra" mempool memory
headroom for itself if the mempool doesn't even exist.
2022-06-28 15:36:18 -04:00
fanquake
2364d17a31
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25480: Replace CountSecondsDouble with Ticks<SecondsDouble>
fa956e7508 Replace CountSecondsDouble with Ticks<SecondsDouble> (MacroFake)

Pull request description:

  Seems odd to have two ways to say exactly the same thing when one is sufficient.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fa956e7508
  shaavan:
    ACK fa956e7508
  w0xlt:
    ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25480/commits/fa956e7508986991008e2f6126ab307924b3f353

Tree-SHA512: b599470e19b693da1ed1102d1e86b08cb03adaddf2048752b6d050fdf86055be117ff0ae10b6953d03e00eaaf7b0cfa350137968b67d6c5b3ca68c5aa50ca6aa
2022-06-28 18:18:19 +01:00
fanquake
2fe27029f5
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25404: p2p, doc: Use MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE consistently
e357c89538 p2p, doc: Use MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE consistently (Martin Zumsande)

Pull request description:

  Block announcements via headers may have up to `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE = 8` entries according to the definition of this constant.
  However, there are a few spots saying they should have a size _less than_ `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE`. Fix these.
  I don't think that this is critical (this only changes behavior when we get a headers announcement with exactly `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE` blocks which we can't connect), but it would be nice to handle this limit consistently.

ACKs for top commit:
  dergoegge:
    utACK e357c89538 - This PR makes the usage and docs of `MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE` consistent with its description.

Tree-SHA512: f3772026ab0f402e3a551127ef6e4a98fa9e7af250715fe317c05988b5b33f2f3e098a00e03960d4d28c8bd2b7a97231f7f99f22f1c152c000b2e27b658cf8f2
2022-06-27 14:21:49 +01:00
MacroFake
50a3921c96
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25144: refactor: Pass Peer& to Misbehaving()
fa8aa0aa81 Pass Peer& to Misbehaving() (MacroFake)

Pull request description:

  `Misbehaving` has several coding related issues (ignoring the conceptual issues here for now):
  * It is public, but it is not supposed to be called from outside of net_processing. Fix that by making it private and creating a public `UnitTestMisbehaving` method for unit testing only.
  * It doesn't do anything if a `nullptr` is passed. It would be less confusing to just skip the call instead. Fix that by passing `Peer&` to `Misbehaving()`.
  * It calls `GetPeerRef`, causing `!m_peer_mutex` lock annotations to be propagated. This is harmless, but verbose. Fix it by removing the no longer needed call to `GetPeerRef` and the no longer needed lock annotations.

ACKs for top commit:
  vasild:
    ACK fa8aa0aa81
  w0xlt:
    Code Review ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25144/commits/fa8aa0aa8180c3a0369c7589b8747666778a0deb

Tree-SHA512: e60a6b317f2b826f9e0724285d00b632d3e2a91ded9fa5ba01c80766c5d39270b719be234c01302d46eaba600910032693836aa116ff05ee1b590c7530881cd3
2022-06-27 11:21:08 +02:00
MacroFake
fa956e7508
Replace CountSecondsDouble with Ticks<SecondsDouble> 2022-06-27 09:34:09 +02:00
Carl Dong
ccbaf546a6 scripted-diff: Rename DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE to indicate SI unit
Better to be explicit when it comes to sizes to avoid unintentional
bugs. We use MB and KB all over the place.

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex="DEFAULT_MAX_MEMPOOL_SIZE" \
    && git grep -l -E "$find_regex" \
        | xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@\0_MB@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-06-22 18:18:56 -04:00
dergoegge
e7a9133766 [net processing] Set CNode::m_relays_txs=true when receiving BIP37 filters
This line was accidentally removed in #22778.
2022-06-22 11:03:35 +02:00
Martin Zumsande
e357c89538 p2p, doc: Use MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE consistently
It is an inclusive upper bound according to its definition.
2022-06-17 16:16:31 -04:00
laanwj
489b587669
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25215: [kernel 2d/n] Reduce CTxMemPool constructor call sites
d273e53b6e bench/rpc_mempool: Create ChainTestingSetup, use its CTxMemPool (Carl Dong)
020caba3df bench: Use existing CTxMemPool in TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
86e732def3 scripted-diff: test: Use CTxMemPool in TestingSetup (Carl Dong)
213457e170 test/policyestimator: Use ChainTestingSetup's CTxMemPool (Carl Dong)
319f0ceeeb rest/getutxos: Don't construct empty mempool (Carl Dong)
03574b956a tree-wide: clang-format CTxMemPool references (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18

  This PR reduces the number of call sites where we explicitly construct CTxMemPool. This is done in preparation for later PRs which decouple the mempool module from `ArgsManager`, eventually all of libbitcoinkernel will be decoupled from `ArgsManager`.

  The changes in this PR:

  - Allows us to have less code churn as we modify `CTxMemPool`'s constructor in later PRs
  - In many cases, we can make use of existing `CTxMemPool` instances, getting rid of extraneous constructions
  - In other cases, we construct a `ChainTestingSetup` and use the `CTxMemPool` there, so that we can rely on the logic in `setup_common` to set things up correctly

  ## Notes for Reviewers

  ### A note on using existing mempools

  When evaluating whether or not it's appropriate to use an existing mempool in a `*TestingSetup` struct, the key is to make sure that the mempool has the same lifetime as the `*TestingSetup` struct.

  Example 1: In [`src/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp`](b4f686952a/src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp), the `TestingSetup` is initialized in `initialize_tx_pool` and lives as a static global, while the `CTxMemPool` is in the `tx_pool_standard` fuzz target, meaning that each time the `tx_pool_standard` fuzz target gets run, a new `CTxMemPool` is created. If we were to use the static global `TestingSetup`'s CTxMemPool we might run into problems since its `CTxMemPool` will carry state between subsequent runs. This is why we don't modify `src/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp` in this PR.

  Example 2: In [`src/bench/mempool_eviction.cpp`](b4f686952a/src/bench/mempool_eviction.cpp), we see that the `TestingSetup` is in the same scope as the constructed `CTxMemPool`, so it is safe to use its `CTxMemPool`.

  ### A note on checking `CTxMemPool` ctor call sites

  After the "tree-wide: clang-format CTxMemPool references" commit, you can find all `CTxMemPool` ctor call sites with the following command:

  ```sh
  git grep -E -e 'make_unique<CTxMemPool>' \
              -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^({;]+[({]' \
              -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^;]+;' \
              -e '\bnew\s+CTxMemPool\b'
  ```

  At the end of the PR, you will find that there are still quite a few call sites that we can seemingly get rid of:

  ```sh
  $ git grep -E -e 'make_unique<CTxMemPool>' -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^({;]+[({]' -e '\bCTxMemPool\s+[^;]+;' -e '\bnew\s+CTxMemPool\b'
  # rearranged for easier explication
  src/init.cpp:        node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(node.fee_estimator.get(), mempool_check_ratio);
  src/test/util/setup_common.cpp:    m_node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(m_node.fee_estimator.get(), 1);
  src/rpc/mining.cpp:        CTxMemPool empty_mempool;
  src/test/util/setup_common.cpp:    CTxMemPool empty_pool;
  src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp:    CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
  src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp:    CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
  src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool{};
  src/txmempool.h:    /** Create a new CTxMemPool.
  ```
  Let's break them down one by one:

  ```
  src/init.cpp:        node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(node.fee_estimator.get(), mempool_check_ratio);
  src/test/util/setup_common.cpp:    m_node.mempool = std::make_unique<CTxMemPool>(m_node.fee_estimator.get(), 1);
  ```

  Necessary

  -----

  ```
  src/rpc/mining.cpp:        CTxMemPool empty_mempool;
  src/test/util/setup_common.cpp:    CTxMemPool empty_pool;
  ```

  These are fixed in #25223 where we stop requiring the `BlockAssembler` to have a `CTxMemPool` if it's not going to consult it anyway (as is the case in these two call sites)

  -----

  ```
  src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  src/bench/mempool_stress.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  ```

  Fixed in #24927.

  -----

  ```
  src/test/fuzz/rbf.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool;
  src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp:    CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
  src/test/fuzz/tx_pool.cpp:    CTxMemPool tx_pool_{/*estimator=*/nullptr, /*check_ratio=*/1};
  src/test/fuzz/validation_load_mempool.cpp:    CTxMemPool pool{};
  ```

  These are all cases where we don't want the `CTxMemPool` state to persist between runs, see the previous section "A note on using existing mempools"

  -----

  ```
  src/txmempool.h:    /** Create a new CTxMemPool.
  ```

  It's a comment (someone link me to a grep that understands syntax plz thx)

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK d273e53b6e

Tree-SHA512: c4ff3d23217a7cc4a7145defc7b901725073ef73bcac3a252ed75f672c87e98ca0368d1d8c3f606b5b49f641e7d8387d26ef802141b650b215876f191fb6d5f9
2022-06-16 19:49:34 +02:00
MacroFake
fafddafc2c
refactor: Introduce PeerManagerImpl::RejectIncomingTxs
Currently there are some confusions in net_processing:

* There is confusion between `-blocksonly mode` and `block-relay-only`,
  so adjust all comments to use the same nomenclature.
* Whether to disconnect peers for providing invs/txs is implemented
  differently. For example, it seems a bit confusing to disconnect
  `block-relay-only` peers with `relay` permission when they send a tx
  message, but not when they send an inv message. Also, keeping track of
  their inv announcements seems both wasteful and confusing, as it does
  nothing. This isn't possible in practice, as outbound connections do
  not have permissions assigned, but sees fragile to rely on. Especially
  in light of proposed changes to make that possible:
  https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17167
2022-06-14 08:39:55 +02:00
MacroFake
8f3ab9a1b1
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24931: Strengthen thread safety assertions
ce893c0497 doc: Update developer notes (Anthony Towns)
d2852917ee sync.h: Imply negative assertions when calling LOCK (Anthony Towns)
bba87c0553 scripted-diff: Convert global Mutexes to GlobalMutexes (Anthony Towns)
a559509a0b sync.h: Add GlobalMutex type (Anthony Towns)
be6aa72f9f qt/clientmodel: thread safety annotation for m_cached_tip_mutex (Anthony Towns)
f24bd45b37 net_processing: thread safety annotation for m_tx_relay_mutex (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This changes `LOCK(mutex)` for non-global, non-recursive mutexes to be annotated with the negative capability for the mutex it refers to, to prevent . clang applies negative capabilities recursively, so this helps avoid forgetting to annotate functions.

  This can't reasonably be used for globals, because clang would require every function to be annotated with `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!g_mutex)` for each global mutex; so this introduces a trivial `GlobalMutex` subclass of `Mutex`, and reduces the annotations for both `GlobalMutex`  to `LOCKS_EXCLUDED` which only catches trivial errors (eg (`LOCK(x); LOCK(x);`).

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK ce893c0497 🐦
  hebasto:
    ACK ce893c0497

Tree-SHA512: 5c35e8c7677ce3d994a7e3774f4344adad496223a51b3a1d1d3b5f20684b2e1d5cff688eb3fbc8d33e1b9940dfa76e515f9434e21de6f3ce3c935e29a319f529
2022-06-10 16:42:53 +02:00
MacroFake
2ab4a80480
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#25254: Move minRelayTxFee to policy/settings
fa4068b4e2 Move minRelayTxFee to policy/settings (MacroFake)

Pull request description:

  Seems a bit confusing to put policy stuff into validation, so fix that.

  Also fix includes via `iwyu`.

ACKs for top commit:
  ariard:
    ACK fa4068b, the includes move compiles well locally.
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK fa4068b4e2. Make sense to move the global variable to policy/settings and the default constant to policy/policy. Ariard points out other constants that could be moved, which seems fine, but it seems like moving the global variable to be with other related global variables is more significant.

Tree-SHA512: adf9619002610d1877f3aef0a9e6115fc4c2ad64135a3e5100824c650b560c47f47ac28894c6214a50a7888355252a9f6f7cec98c23a771a1964160ef1ca77de
2022-06-07 11:31:10 +02:00