Some GUI changes that conflict with commented-out code. I made an educated
guess as to what new stuff should be commented out or not but honestly I
have no idea what the GUI is supposed to do or show.
c231254a65 qt: Make TransactionView aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
2b622d4ace qt: Make CoinControlDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
97a6b5e06a qt: Make OverviewPage aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
d05f1b278d qt: Make UnitDisplayStatusBarControl aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
6b2ce65392 qt: Replace base class of ClickableLabel with ThemedLabel (Hennadii Stepanov)
ff530a2093 qt: Use GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
d99ef327a8 qt: Add GUIUtil::ThemedLabel class (Hennadii Stepanov)
c054720e08 qt: Make SignVerifyMessageDialog aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
0dcc3fac43 qt: Make SendCoinsEntry aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa18d28e12 qt: Make RPCConsole aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
f1083826e3 qt: Make BitcoinGUI aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
ce17861dc4 qt: Make PlatformStyle aware of runtime palette change (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On macOS switching appearance (Light -> Dark or Dark -> Light) when Bitcoin Core is running makes the GUI pretty unusable.
This bug is especially important when a user chose the "Auto" mode to adjust appearance automatically.
This PR fixes Bitcoin Core behavior.
This is an alternative to #268.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK c231254a65 on macOS 11.4
goums:
ACK c231254a65
promag:
Tested ACK c231254a65 on macOS Big Sur arm64.
jarolrod:
tACK c231254a65
Tree-SHA512: 122dda3e4c9703f68cec60613c536ca59d04c93f2c03398559f2361b8d279ae534800e8e677d94a33e10e769d00be54295a704e98afa2e986a06146b9f164854
88df300f20 qt: Do not translate file extensions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
File extensions are untranslatable by their nature.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK 88df300f20
Talkless:
tACK 88df300f20, tested on Debian Sid with Qt 5.15.2. Tested all filters except for .psbt.
jarolrod:
re-ACK 88df300f20
Tree-SHA512: 104d383543edcee8fb825f98d3b6669a7aaae2c74b6602f9bc407bf1c88be121ec535f2f9be87afa6ca775dc79865165f620553f6f6ab1d31a3f9ea93f7f9593
8f9644890a qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `Edit Label` action from the `transactionview` context menu. Since the `Edit Label` action will no longer be utilized in the `transactionview`, the `Edit Label` function logic is also removed.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 34 34 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292189-9b86c800-7161-11eb-9e80-6238523bc27e.png">|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 35 10 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292204-a17ca900-7161-11eb-8582-7f33d3e2ba8f.png">|
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the `transactionview` is the `Edit Label` action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the `Edit Label` action applies to the selected transaction's address. As documented in issue #209 and [#1168](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1168) , this is an "unfortunate" placement for such an action. The current placement creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous.
**Example of Ambiguous Behavior:**
The context menu gives the wrong impression that the `Edit Label` action will edit a `Label` for the specific transaction that has been right-clicked on. This impression can be because all other actions in this menu will relate to the specific transaction and the misconception between `Comment` and `Label`.
<img width="1062" alt="editlabel-start" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108296385-6da48200-7167-11eb-89f0-b21ccc58f6f4.png">
Let's say I wanted to give the transaction selected in the screenshot above a comment of "2-17[17:43]". Given all the context clues, it will be reasonable to assume that the `Edit Label` function will give a label to this transaction. Instead, it edits the `Label` for the address behind this transaction. Thus, changing the `Label` for all transactions associated with this address.
<img width="971" alt="editlabel-end" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108297179-e35d1d80-7168-11eb-86a9-0d2796c51829.png">
**Maintaining `Edit Label` Functionality:**
The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the respective address tables of the `Send` and `Receive` tabs. As documented in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/209#issuecomment-780922101), `Edit Label` is currently implemented in the `Send` tab and is missing in the `Receive` tab. A follow-up PR can add the `Edit Label` functionality to the `Receive` tab.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f9644890a
Talkless:
tACK 8f9644890a, tested on Debian Sid.
Tree-SHA512: 70bbcc8be3364b0d4f476a9760aa14ad1ad1f53b0b130ce0ffe75190d76c386e6e26c530c0a55d1742402fe2b45c68a2af6dbfaf58ee9909ad93b06f0b6559d4
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the transactionview is the 'Edit Label' action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the 'Edit Label' action applies to the address of the selected transaction. This creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous. The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the Send and Receive tabs.
This PR removes the 'Edit Label' action from the transactionview context menu. Since the 'Edit Label' action will no longer be utilized in the transactionview, the 'Edit Label' function logic is also removed.
In Qt 5 the last column resizing with dragging its left edge works
out-of-the-box.
The current TableViewLastColumnResizingFixer implementation could put
the last column content out of the view port and confuse a user.
