This removes the ability to set an offset in the SpanReader constructor,
as the current code is broken. All call sites use pos=0, so it is actually
unused. If future call sites need it, SpanReader{a, b, c, d} is equivalent
to SpanReader{a, b, c.subspan(d)}.
It also removes the ability to deserialize from SpanReader directly from
the constructor. This too is unused, and can be more idiomatically
simulated using (SpanReader{a, b, c} >> x >> y >> z) instead of
SpanReader{a, b, c, x, y, z}.
11daf6ceb1 More Span simplifications (Pieter Wuille)
568dd2f839 Replace MakeSpan helper with Span deduction guide (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
C++17 supports [user-defined deduction guides](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/class_template_argument_deduction), allowing class constructors to be invoked without specifying class template arguments. Instead, the code can contain rules to infer the template arguments from the constructor argument types.
This alleviates the need for the `MakeSpan` helper. Convert the existing MakeSpan rules into deduction rules for `Span` itself, and replace all invocations of `MakeSpan` with just `Span` ones.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 11daf6ceb1 Only change is removing a hunk in the tests 🌕
Tree-SHA512: 10f3e82e4338f39d9b7b407cd11aac7ebe1e9191b58e3d7f4e5e338a4636c0e126b4a1d912127c7446f57ba356c8d6544482e47f97901efea6a54fffbfd7895f
Messy merge conflicts because this PR backported some ad-hoc stuff from
upstream while keeping a few things that upstream deleted. Hopefully
reviewing is easier than doing this in the first place, since ultimately
all I did was delete code from one side or another of the conflicts.
(Ok, I also changed some boost optional stuff to std::optional, and had
to patch up a test file for test framework changes.)
When reviewing the detailed crypto, bear in mind that taptweaks, like all
hashes are the kind of crypto that cannot be subtly wrong -- it will either
fail very hard or be correct. And we have independent implementations in
C++ and Python that cross-check each other, si it's unlikely to be the former.
This forward-ports the new Taproot sighash but does not fix a couple
22-blocked TODOs related to the MissingDataBehavior enum. Should be fixed
in a followup commit.
One nontrivial change I had to make was feeding the genesis hash to SignTransaction
(the "global" one in script/sign.cpp) so that it could correctly compute
the sighash at signing time.
These "pass" locally but in CI they download pre-signed transactions
from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/ which we need to
fork and recreate.
Essentially these files are the output of the Taproot functional
test (which passes), so I am not too worried about actual failures
here. But we should wait until after the Taproot sighash is finalized
to recreate these assets.
Several conflicts in the C++ code related to the new `flags` parameter
to `CheckSignature` and the corresponding function being renamed upstream
to `CheckSignatureECDSA`.
Several conflicts in the test harness as Steven sorta pulled the new
upstream ECKey module into the Python code, and the actual upstream
code was slightly different. Also needed to update the feature_taproot
code to always use the non-RANGEPROOF sighash since dynafed is not
enabled in the Taproot test.
Also had to pull the `set_wif` method out of `ECKey` and inline it because
otherwise it triggers a "circular inclusion" error between script.py (which
would pull in `base58_to_bytes` from address.py) and address.py (which now
pulls in some taproot EC related stuff from script.py).
Noticed that #960 does not test the "sighash rangeproof flag set but no
witnesses" case.
Remove the implicit MissingDataBehavior::ASSERT_FAIL in the
*TransationSignatureChecker constructors, and instead specify
it explicit in all call sites:
* Test code uses ASSERT_FAIL
* Validation uses ASSERT_FAIL (through CachingTransactionSignatureChecker)
(including signet)
* libconsensus uses FAIL, matching the existing behavior of the
non-amount API (and the extended required data for taproot validation
is not available yet)
* Signing code uses FAIL
This adds a --dumptests flag to the feature_taproot.py test, to dump all its
generated test cases to files, in a format compatible with the
script_assets_test unit test. A fuzzer for said format is added as well, whose
primary purpose is coverage-based minimization of those dumps.
This adds a unit test that does generic script verification tests,
with positive/negative witnesses/scriptsigs, under various flags.
The test data is large (several MB) so it's stored in the qa-assets
repo.
