We comment out a newly-added assert from the Bitcoin
side, because it's unclear how to replicate it
correctly in Elements.
Co-authored-by: Glenn Willen <gwillen@nerdnet.org>
3cb9612faa test: add test for Taproot activation (Andrew Poelstra)
5291c0d9d9 chainparams: add undocumented regtest/testnet only -con_taproot_signal_start option (Andrew Poelstra)
cc6b933478 add missing taproot activation params for Liquid v1 (Andrew Poelstra)
bec6bcf31b versionbits: allow specific deployments to override the signalling/threshold values (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
Sets Taproot to start signalling around noon (California time) on Nov 1, 2021, assuming 95% of blocks are produced between now and then.
Will activate after one week of 100% signalling. If we can pull this off on the first or second try, we will beat Bitcoin which currently looks like it will activate on Nov 16.
**Edit:** actually, even without Speedy Trial, there is one full period (week) where Taproot will be "locked in" but not "active". So it will activate on Nov 15 at the earliest.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 3cb9612faa
Tree-SHA512: c3a80d39ba86a0d762a3057cb9c45e379c70c2daee8ff2e54978a4c32118c935c8909d872ac9f873e283441c52c1974c06268f10dc7bf9e9e000c21063ac84d7
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
Looks like James hardcoded a couple hashes in hard-to-find places, which
caused a unit test to fail. I just changed the hash (which covers UTXO
data which naturally will be different for us on account of our differently
formatted CTxOuts).
TODO: determine how Assumeutxo interacts with the fact that we don't save
out nonces in our normal UTXO serialization. Probably we will need to remove
the nonce from the CCoinStats serialization to avoid having inconsistent
hashes across nodes, since these hashes are now checked in assumeutxo?
ffe33dfbd4 chainparams: drop versionbits threshold to 90% for mainnnet and signet (Anthony Towns)
f054f6bcd2 versionbits: simplify state transitions (Anthony Towns)
55ac5f568a versionbits: Add explicit NEVER_ACTIVE deployments (Anthony Towns)
dd07e6da48 fuzz: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
dd85d5411c tests: test versionbits delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
73d4a70639 versionbits: Add support for delayed activation (Anthony Towns)
9e6b65f6fa tests: clean up versionbits test (Anthony Towns)
5932744450 tests: test ComputeBlockVersion for all deployments (Anthony Towns)
63879f0a47 tests: pull ComputeBlockVersion test into its own function (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
BIP9-based implementation of "speedy trial" activation specification, see https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-March/018583.html
Edge cases are tested by fuzzing added in #21380.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
tACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21377/commits/ffe33dfbd4c3b11e3475b022b6c1dd077613de79
jnewbery:
utACK ffe33dfbd4
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ffe33dfbd4💈
achow101:
re-ACK ffe33dfbd4
gmaxwell:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
benthecarman:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
Sjors:
ACK ffe33dfbd4
jonatack:
Initial approach ACK ffe33dfbd4 after a first pass of review, building and testing each commit, mostly looking at the changes and diffs. Will do a more high-level review iteration. A few minor comments follow to pick/choose/ignore.
ariard:
Code Review ACK ffe33df
Tree-SHA512: f79a7146b2450057ee92155cbbbcec12cd64334236d9239c6bd7d31b32eec145a9781c320f178da7b44ababdb8808b84d9d22a40e0851e229ba6d224e3be747c
