ChannelCreator: fund candidates in track-record tier order
Some checks are pending
Code Base Sanity Check / tests (push) Waiting to run
Code Base Sanity Check / coverage (push) Waiting to run
Code Base Sanity Check / build-clang (push) Waiting to run

After the size rearranger and the IP-binning reprioritizer, partition
the proposal list by track-record verdict: keepers first, then
candidates with no record, then underperformers.  Within a tier the
earlier stages' order is preserved.  Because the Planner consumes
proposals in order until funds run out, placing a tier last implements
'only used if no better candidate can absorb the funds' without an
outright veto.  The partition runs last so the earlier perturbation
stages cannot promote a candidate across a tier boundary.

Logs one Info line per creation request with the per-tier membership
and each judged candidate's TRAL and observed days.
This commit is contained in:
Ken Sedgwick 2026-07-15 10:59:00 -07:00
parent d7a5d73d53
commit d06c0c32c2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: DBD2AF0849D711A9
3 changed files with 133 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include"Util/make_unique.hpp"
#include<algorithm>
#include<assert.h>
#include<cmath>
#include<sstream>
namespace {
@ -161,6 +162,19 @@ Manager::on_request_channel_creation(Ln::Amount amt) {
* nodes with similar locations.
*/
return reprioritize(std::move(proposals));
}).then([this](std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>> proposals) {
/* Finally, partition by earnings track record, so
* proven earners are funded first and known
* underperformers only when nothing else can absorb
* the funds. This runs after the rearranger and
* reprioritizer on purpose: those two only perturb
* the order, and must not promote a candidate across
* a track-record tier boundary. The Planner consumes
* proposals in order until funds run out, so placing
* a tier last implements "only if there are no
* others" without an outright veto.
*/
return prioritize_by_track_record(std::move(proposals));
}).then([ num_chans
, amt
, dowser_func
@ -307,5 +321,103 @@ Manager::reprioritize(std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>> proposals_v
return Ev::lift(std::move(*proposals));
});
}
Ev::Io<std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>>>
Manager::prioritize_by_track_record(std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>> proposals_v) {
typedef std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>> Proposals;
if (proposals_v.empty())
return Ev::lift(std::move(proposals_v));
auto nodes = std::vector<Ln::NodeId>();
for (auto const& p : proposals_v)
nodes.push_back(p.first);
auto proposals = std::make_shared<Proposals>(std::move(proposals_v));
return track_record.execute(Msg::RequestPeerTrackRecord{
nullptr, std::move(nodes)
}).then([ this
, proposals
](Msg::ResponsePeerTrackRecord resp) {
auto keepers = Proposals();
auto no_records = Proposals();
auto underperformers = Proposals();
/* Per-tier report text; nodes within a tier keep their
* relative order from the earlier stages. */
auto keepers_s = std::string();
auto no_records_s = std::string();
auto underperformers_s = std::string();
auto append = []( std::string& s
, std::string const& entry
) {
if (!s.empty())
s += ", ";
s += entry;
};
for (auto const& p : *proposals) {
auto rec = Msg::TrackRecord{
Msg::TrackRecordVerdict::NoRecord,
0.0, 0.0, 0
};
auto it = resp.records.find(p.first);
if (it != resp.records.end())
rec = it->second;
auto os = std::ostringstream();
os << p.first;
if (rec.verdict != Msg::TrackRecordVerdict::NoRecord)
os << "(" << std::showpos
<< (long long) std::llround(rec.tral_bps)
<< std::noshowpos << "bps/"
<< (long long) std::llround(rec.op_days)
<< "d)"
;
switch (rec.verdict) {
case Msg::TrackRecordVerdict::Keeper:
keepers.push_back(p);
append(keepers_s, os.str());
break;
case Msg::TrackRecordVerdict::NoRecord:
no_records.push_back(p);
append(no_records_s, os.str());
break;
case Msg::TrackRecordVerdict::Underperformer:
underperformers.push_back(p);
append(underperformers_s, os.str());
break;
}
}
auto report = std::string();
if (!keepers_s.empty())
report += "keepers: " + keepers_s + "; ";
if (!no_records_s.empty())
report += "no record: " + no_records_s + "; ";
if (!underperformers_s.empty())
report += "underperformers: "
+ underperformers_s + "; "
;
/* Trim the trailing "; ". */
report.erase(report.size() - 2);
*proposals = std::move(keepers);
proposals->insert( proposals->end()
, no_records.begin(), no_records.end()
);
proposals->insert( proposals->end()
, underperformers.begin()
, underperformers.end()
);
return Boss::log( bus, Info
, "ChannelCreator: Track records: %s"
, report.c_str()
).then([proposals]() {
return Ev::lift(std::move(*proposals));
});
});
}
}}}

View file

@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
#include"Boss/Mod/ChannelCreator/Reprioritizer.hpp"
#include"Boss/ModG/ReqResp.hpp"
#include"Boss/Msg/RequestDowser.hpp"
#include"Boss/Msg/RequestPeerTrackRecord.hpp"
#include"Boss/Msg/ResponseDowser.hpp"
#include"Boss/Msg/ResponsePeerTrackRecord.hpp"
#include"Ln/NodeId.hpp"
#include<memory>
#include<utility>
@ -40,6 +42,9 @@ private:
Ln::NodeId self;
ModG::ReqResp<Msg::RequestDowser, Msg::ResponseDowser> dowser;
ModG::ReqResp< Msg::RequestPeerTrackRecord
, Msg::ResponsePeerTrackRecord
> track_record;
std::unique_ptr<Boss::Mod::ChannelCreator::Reprioritizer> reprioritizer;
@ -56,6 +61,9 @@ private:
/* Perform reprioritization and log it. */
Ev::Io<std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>>>
reprioritize(std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>>);
/* Partition proposals by earnings track record and log it. */
Ev::Io<std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>>>
prioritize_by_track_record(std::vector<std::pair<Ln::NodeId, Ln::NodeId>>);
public:
Manager() =delete;
@ -72,6 +80,7 @@ public:
, carpenter(carpenter_)
, self()
, dowser(bus)
, track_record(bus)
{
start();
}

View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# This script produces a summary of channel forwarding stats
#
# - Displays PeerID, SCID, and Alias for each channel
# - Displays SCID and Alias (or the full PeerID with --ids) for each channel
# - Uses `clboss-recent-earnings` to limit the history considered
#
# The channels at the top of the list are good, the ones at the bottom are bad.
@ -222,6 +222,11 @@ def main():
"--sort", choices=["fral", "tral"], default="fral",
help="Column to sort by (default: fral).",
)
parser.add_argument(
"--ids", action="store_true",
help="Show full peer node ids instead of aliases "
"(paste-ready for commands that take a nodeid).",
)
args = parser.parse_args()
@ -389,7 +394,10 @@ def main():
tralstr = f"{tral:.3f}" if tral is not None else "--"
fwded = peer.get("in_forwarded", 0) + peer.get("out_forwarded", 0)
netearnings = peer_net_earnings(peer)
alias = pad_string(peer["alias"], max_alias_length)
if args.ids:
alias = peer_id
else:
alias = pad_string(peer["alias"], max_alias_length)
opener = "L" if channels[short_channel_id]["opener"] == "local" else "R"
agestr = str(int(peer_age_days(peer)))
opdaysstr = f"{op_days:.1f}"
@ -414,9 +422,10 @@ def main():
)
# Print the table without grid
id_col = "PeerID" if args.ids else "Alias"
table_str = tabulate(
table_data,
headers=["Alias", "SCID", "O", "curr_to_us", "avg_to_us", "Age", "OpDays", "Forwarded", "NetEarn", "FRAL**", "TRAL*"],
headers=[id_col, "SCID", "O", "curr_to_us", "avg_to_us", "Age", "OpDays", "Forwarded", "NetEarn", "FRAL**", "TRAL*"],
tablefmt="plain",
stralign="left",
numalign="right",